Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale (GHDRS):towards complex and objective assessment
0
⚙️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Graphomotor and handwriting disabilities (GD and HD) can significantly impact children's quality of life
- Current approaches to diagnosing and assessing GD and HD have limitations, such as being subjective and not facilitating identification of specific manifestations
- This paper introduces a new scale called the Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale (GHDRS) to enable objective and comprehensive computer-aided diagnosis and assessment of GD and HD
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new tool called the Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale (GHDRS) that aims to help identify and assess difficulties children may have with handwriting and the physical process of writing (graphomotor skills). These challenges, known as graphomotor disabilities (GD) and handwriting disabilities (HD), can significantly impact a child's quality of life and ability to learn.
Currently, the ways experts diagnose and evaluate these issues have some limitations. They can be subjective, meaning different experts may come to different conclusions about the same child. They also don't always clearly identify the specific problems a child is having. The new GHDRS scale is designed to provide a more objective and comprehensive way to assess these difficulties. It allows experts to quantify 17 different aspects of the writing process and the final handwriting product.
The researchers have made the process of developing this new scale as transparent as possible, so it could potentially be adapted for use with other languages besides the one they focused on. This transparency is important so the scale can be widely adopted and improved over time.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale (GHDRS), a new tool designed to enable objective and comprehensive computer-aided diagnosis and assessment of graphomotor disabilities (GD) and handwriting disabilities (HD) in children.
The GHDRS scale supports the quantification of 17 manifestations associated with the process (e.g. pressure, pen grip, fluency) and product (e.g. letter formation, spacing, alignment) of drawing and handwriting. This level of detailed assessment represents an advance over current subjective approaches that do not facilitate the identification of specific difficulties.
The researchers followed a rigorous methodology to develop the GHDRS, including literature reviews, expert consultations, and pilot testing. This process is described in detail to enable adaptation of the scale for other languages, as demonstrated through the MathWriting dataset for handwritten mathematical expression recognition.
The use of computer-aided assessment through the GHDRS is intended to enhance objectivity and consistency in the diagnosis and evaluation of GD and HD, which can significantly impact children's academic performance and quality of life. The scale's multidimensional approach represents an advance over existing machine learning-based analysis of handwriting for conditions like Alzheimer's disease.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and transparent methodology for developing the GHDRS, which is a strength. However, the researchers acknowledge that further validation and refinement of the scale will be necessary, particularly to ensure its reliability and sensitivity across different populations and cultural contexts.
Additionally, while the scale aims to enable objective assessment, there may still be some subjectivity in the interpretation of the 17 manifestations and how they are scored. The researchers note that training and calibration of experts using the GHDRS will be crucial for consistent application.
Another potential limitation is the reliance on computer-aided assessment, which may not be accessible or practical in all settings. The researchers could explore ways to adapt the GHDRS for more low-tech, clinician-driven evaluation as well.
Overall, the GHDRS represents a promising step forward in the assessment of graphomotor and handwriting disabilities, but continued research and development will be needed to fully realize its potential.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale (GHDRS), a new tool designed to enable objective and comprehensive computer-aided diagnosis and assessment of graphomotor disabilities (GD) and handwriting disabilities (HD) in children.
The GHDRS addresses limitations of current subjective approaches by quantifying 17 specific manifestations of the writing process and product. This detailed assessment can help experts better identify the exact challenges a child is facing, which is crucial for developing effective remediation strategies.
While further validation and refinement of the GHDRS will be needed, this research represents an important step forward in improving the diagnosis and support for children affected by GD and HD, which can significantly impact their quality of life and academic performance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
0
Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale (GHDRS):towards complex and objective assessment
Jiri Mekyska, Katarina Safarova, Tomas Urbanek, Jirina Bednarova, Vojtech Zvoncak, Jana Marie Havigerova, Lukas Cunek, Zoltan Galaz, Jan Mucha, Christine Klauszova, Marcos Faundez-Zanuy, Miguel A. Ferrer, Moises Diaz
Graphomotor and handwriting disabilities (GD and HD, respectively) could significantly reduce children's quality of life. Effective remediation depends on proper diagnosis; however, current approaches to diagnosis and assessment of GD and HD have several limitations and knowledge gaps, e.g. they are subjective, they do not facilitate identification of specific manifestations, etc. The aim of this work is to introduce a new scale (GHDRS Graphomotor and Handwriting Disabilities Rating Scale) that will enable experts to perform objective and complex computeraided diagnosis and assessment of GD and HD. The scale supports quantification of 17 manifestations associated with the process/product of drawing/ handwriting. The whole methodology of GHDRS design is made maximally transparent so that it could be adapted for other languages.
Read more5/29/2024
📉
0
A short review on graphonometric evaluation tools in children
Belen Esther Aleman, Moises Diaz, Miguel Angel Ferrer
Handwriting is a complex task that involves the coordination of motor, perceptual and cognitive skills. It is a fundamental skill for the cognitive and academic development of children. However, the technological, and educational changes in recent decades have affected both the teaching and assessment of handwriting. This paper presents a literature review of handwriting analysis in children, including a bibliometric analysis of published articles, the study participants, and the methods of evaluating the graphonometric state of children. The aim is to synthesize the state of the art and provide an overview of the main study trends over the last decade. The review concludes that handwriting remains a fundamental tool for early estimation of cognitive problems and early intervention. The article analyzes graphonometric evaluation tools. Likewise, it reflects on the importance of graphonometric evaluation as a means to detect possible difficulties or disorders in learning to write. The article concludes by highlighting the need to agree on an evaluation methodology and to combine databases.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Explainable Metrics for the Assessment of Neurodegenerative Diseases through Handwriting Analysis
Thomas Thebaud, Anna Favaro, Casey Chen, Gabrielle Chavez, Laureano Moro-Velazquez, Ankur Butala, Najim Dehak
Motor changes are early signs of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), but are often difficult to detect, especially in the early stages. In this work, we examine the behavior of a wide array of explainable metrics extracted from the handwriting signals of 113 subjects performing multiple tasks on a digital tablet. The aim is to measure their effectiveness in characterizing and assessing multiple NDs, including AD and PD. To this end, task-agnostic and task-specific metrics are extracted from 14 distinct tasks. Subsequently, through statistical analysis and a series of classification experiments, we investigate which metrics provide greater discriminative power between NDs and healthy controls and among different NDs. Preliminary results indicate that the various tasks at hand can all be effectively leveraged to distinguish between the considered set of NDs, specifically by measuring the stability, the speed of writing, the time spent not writing, and the pressure variations between groups from our handcrafted explainable metrics, which shows p-values lower than 0.0001 for multiple tasks. Using various classification algorithms on the computed metrics, we obtain up to 87% accuracy to discriminate AD and healthy controls (CTL), and up to 69% for PD vs CTL.
Read more9/16/2024
✨
0
Multimodal Ensemble with Conditional Feature Fusion for Dysgraphia Diagnosis in Children from Handwriting Samples
Jayakanth Kunhoth, Somaya Al-Maadeed, Moutaz Saleh, Younes Akbari
Developmental dysgraphia is a neurological disorder that hinders children's writing skills. In recent years, researchers have increasingly explored machine learning methods to support the diagnosis of dysgraphia based on offline and online handwriting. In most previous studies, the two types of handwriting have been analysed separately, which does not necessarily lead to promising results. In this way, the relationship between online and offline data cannot be explored. To address this limitation, we propose a novel multimodal machine learning approach utilizing both online and offline handwriting data. We created a new dataset by transforming an existing online handwritten dataset, generating corresponding offline handwriting images. We considered only different types of word data (simple word, pseudoword & difficult word) in our multimodal analysis. We trained SVM and XGBoost classifiers separately on online and offline features as well as implemented multimodal feature fusion and soft-voted ensemble. Furthermore, we proposed a novel ensemble with conditional feature fusion method which intelligently combines predictions from online and offline classifiers, selectively incorporating feature fusion when confidence scores fall below a threshold. Our novel approach achieves an accuracy of 88.8%, outperforming SVMs for single modalities by 12-14%, existing methods by 8-9%, and traditional multimodal approaches (soft-vote ensemble and feature fusion) by 3% and 5%, respectively. Our methodology contributes to the development of accurate and efficient dysgraphia diagnosis tools, requiring only a single instance of multimodal word/pseudoword data to determine the handwriting impairment. This work highlights the potential of multimodal learning in enhancing dysgraphia diagnosis, paving the way for accessible and practical diagnostic tools.
Read more8/27/2024