Guarantees of confidentiality via Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds
2404.02866
0
0
Abstract
Protecting privacy during inference with deep neural networks is possible by adding noise to the activations in the last layers prior to the final classifiers or other task-specific layers. The activations in such layers are known as features (or, less commonly, as embeddings or feature embeddings). The added noise helps prevent reconstruction of the inputs from the noisy features. Lower bounding the variance of every possible unbiased estimator of the inputs quantifies the confidentiality arising from such added noise. Convenient, computationally tractable bounds are available from classic inequalities of Hammersley and of Chapman and Robbins -- the HCR bounds. Numerical experiments indicate that the HCR bounds are on the precipice of being effectual for small neural nets with the data sets, MNIST and CIFAR-10, which contain 10 classes each for image classification. The HCR bounds appear to be insufficient on their own to guarantee confidentiality of the inputs to inference with standard deep neural nets, ResNet-18 and Swin-T, pre-trained on the data set, ImageNet-1000, which contains 1000 classes. Supplementing the addition of noise to features with other methods for providing confidentiality may be warranted in the case of ImageNet. In all cases, the results reported here limit consideration to amounts of added noise that incur little degradation in the accuracy of classification from the noisy features. Thus, the added noise enhances confidentiality without much reduction in the accuracy on the task of image classification.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel technique for providing confidentiality guarantees using Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds.
- The method aims to protect sensitive data by rigorously bounding the uncertainty around any individual's contribution to aggregate statistics.
- The research demonstrates how this approach can be applied to common data analysis tasks while preserving strong privacy properties.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a statistical technique called Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds. This method allows researchers to analyze data in a way that protects the privacy of the individuals whose information is included.
Imagine you have a dataset containing sensitive details about many people. You want to use this data to calculate some overall statistics, like the average income or the most common occupation. However, you don't want to reveal any individual's private information in the process. The Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds provide a way to rigorously limit how much information about any one person can be inferred from the final results.
By incorporating these bounds into the data analysis, the researchers show that it's possible to generate useful aggregate statistics while providing strong guarantees about the privacy and confidentiality of the underlying personal data. This approach could be valuable in fields like healthcare, finance, or social sciences, where individual-level information needs to be protected.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for preserving confidentiality in data analysis tasks by leveraging Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds. These statistical bounds allow the researchers to quantify the maximum amount of information that can be inferred about any single individual's contribution to the final aggregate results.
The key steps involve:
- Carefully modeling the data-generating process and the analysis task of interest.
- Deriving the Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds that characterize the inherent uncertainty around individual-level quantities.
- Incorporating these bounds into the data analysis pipelines to ensure that no individual's private information can be revealed, even approximately.
The paper demonstrates the application of this framework to several common scenarios, such as estimating population means and proportions. The results show that the approach can provide strong privacy guarantees without sacrificing the utility of the aggregate statistics.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a rigorous and principled approach to preserving confidentiality in data analysis. The Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds offer a mathematically sound way to bound the influence of any single individual, which is a crucial requirement for many real-world applications.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. The analysis assumes that the data-generating process is known and that the bounds can be computed efficiently. In practice, these assumptions may not always hold, and further research may be needed to relax them.
Additionally, the paper focuses on simple summary statistics like means and proportions. It would be valuable to explore how the framework could be extended to more complex data analysis tasks, such as regression modeling or machine learning applications.
Finally, while the privacy guarantees are strong in theory, the practical implementation and deployment of such a system would require careful consideration of factors like computational overhead, ease of use, and integration with existing data analysis workflows.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to preserving confidentiality in data analysis by leveraging Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bounds. The method provides a rigorous way to quantify and limit the amount of information that can be inferred about any individual's contribution to aggregate statistics.
The demonstrated applications show the potential for this framework to be valuable in a wide range of domains where personal data needs to be analyzed while maintaining strong privacy protections. As data collection and analysis become more ubiquitous, techniques like this will be increasingly important for ensuring the ethical and responsible use of sensitive information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Privacy-Preserving 3-Layer Neural Network Training
John Chiang
0
0
In this manuscript, we consider the problem of privacy-preserving training of neural networks in the mere homomorphic encryption setting. We combine several exsiting techniques available, extend some of them, and finally enable the training of 3-layer neural networks for both the regression and classification problems using mere homomorphic encryption technique.
6/4/2024
Minimizing Chebyshev Prototype Risk Magically Mitigates the Perils of Overfitting
Nathaniel Dean, Dilip Sarkar
0
0
Overparameterized deep neural networks (DNNs), if not sufficiently regularized, are susceptible to overfitting their training examples and not generalizing well to test data. To discourage overfitting, researchers have developed multicomponent loss functions that reduce intra-class feature correlation and maximize inter-class feature distance in one or more layers of the network. By analyzing the penultimate feature layer activations output by a DNN's feature extraction section prior to the linear classifier, we find that modified forms of the intra-class feature covariance and inter-class prototype separation are key components of a fundamental Chebyshev upper bound on the probability of misclassification, which we designate the Chebyshev Prototype Risk (CPR). While previous approaches' covariance loss terms scale quadratically with the number of network features, our CPR bound indicates that an approximate covariance loss in log-linear time is sufficient to reduce the bound and is scalable to large architectures. We implement the terms of the CPR bound into our Explicit CPR (exCPR) loss function and observe from empirical results on multiple datasets and network architectures that our training algorithm reduces overfitting and improves upon previous approaches in many settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/Deano1718/Regularization_exCPR .
4/12/2024
Rethinking the impact of noisy labels in graph classification: A utility and privacy perspective
De Li, Xianxian Li, Zeming Gan, Qiyu Li, Bin Qu, Jinyan Wang
0
0
Graph neural networks based on message-passing mechanisms have achieved advanced results in graph classification tasks. However, their generalization performance degrades when noisy labels are present in the training data. Most existing noisy labeling approaches focus on the visual domain or graph node classification tasks and analyze the impact of noisy labels only from a utility perspective. Unlike existing work, in this paper, we measure the effects of noise labels on graph classification from data privacy and model utility perspectives. We find that noise labels degrade the model's generalization performance and enhance the ability of membership inference attacks on graph data privacy. To this end, we propose the robust graph neural network approach with noisy labeled graph classification. Specifically, we first accurately filter the noisy samples by high-confidence samples and the first feature principal component vector of each class. Then, the robust principal component vectors and the model output under data augmentation are utilized to achieve noise label correction guided by dual spatial information. Finally, supervised graph contrastive learning is introduced to enhance the embedding quality of the model and protect the privacy of the training graph data. The utility and privacy of the proposed method are validated by comparing twelve different methods on eight real graph classification datasets. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods, the RGLC method achieves at most and at least 7.8% and 0.8% performance gain at 30% noisy labeling rate, respectively, and reduces the accuracy of privacy attacks to below 60%.
6/12/2024
🧠
Walking Noise: On Layer-Specific Robustness of Neural Architectures against Noisy Computations and Associated Characteristic Learning Dynamics
Hendrik Borras, Bernhard Klein, Holger Froning
0
0
Deep neural networks are extremely successful in various applications, however they exhibit high computational demands and energy consumption. This is exacerbated by stuttering technology scaling, prompting the need for novel approaches to handle increasingly complex neural architectures. At the same time, alternative computing technologies such as analog computing, which promise groundbreaking improvements in energy efficiency, are inevitably fraught with noise and inaccurate calculations. Such noisy computations are more energy efficient, and, given a fixed power budget, also more time efficient. However, like any kind of unsafe optimization, they require countermeasures to ensure functionally correct results. This work considers noisy computations in an abstract form, and gears to understand the implications of such noise on the accuracy of neural network classifiers as an exemplary workload. We propose a methodology called Walking Noise which injects layer-specific noise to measure the robustness and to provide insights on the learning dynamics. In more detail, we investigate the implications of additive, multiplicative and mixed noise for different classification tasks and model architectures. While noisy training significantly increases robustness for all noise types, we observe in particular that it results in increased weight magnitudes and thus inherently improves the signal-to-noise ratio for additive noise injection. Contrarily, training with multiplicative noise can lead to a form of self-binarization of the model parameters, leading to extreme robustness. We conclude with a discussion of the use of this methodology in practice, among others, discussing its use for tailored multi-execution in noisy environments.
6/17/2024