GuideLight: Industrial Solution Guidance for More Practical Traffic Signal Control Agents

Read original: arXiv:2407.10811 - Published 7/16/2024 by Haoyuan Jiang, Xuantang Xiong, Ziyue Li, Hangyu Mao, Guanghu Sui, Jingqing Ruan, Yuheng Cheng, Hua Wei, Wolfgang Ketter, Rui Zhao
Total Score

0

GuideLight: Industrial Solution Guidance for More Practical Traffic Signal Control Agents

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper introduces a new approach called "GuideLight" for more practical and effective traffic signal control using reinforcement learning and guidance from industrial experts.

Plain English Explanation

• The paper focuses on improving traffic signal control, which is an important problem as inefficient traffic signals can lead to increased congestion, pollution, and driver frustration.

• Typical traffic signal control systems use predefined timing plans, which can be inflexible and not adapt well to changing traffic conditions. The authors propose using reinforcement learning, a type of machine learning, to automatically optimize traffic signal timings.

• However, the authors recognize that directly applying reinforcement learning to real-world traffic signal control can be challenging. To address this, they incorporate "industrial solutions" - guidance and insights from traffic engineers and domain experts - to make the reinforcement learning approach more practical and effective.

• The key idea is to leverage the expertise of traffic engineers to provide helpful guidance to the reinforcement learning agent, shaping its behavior and decisions to be more aligned with real-world concerns and constraints.

• By combining reinforcement learning with expert guidance, the authors aim to develop a more robust and deployable traffic signal control system that can better handle the complexity of real-world traffic conditions.

Technical Explanation

• The paper proposes a new framework called "GuideLight" that integrates reinforcement learning with expert guidance for traffic signal control.

• The reinforcement learning component is based on the ILLM-TSC-Integration approach, which uses a large language model to enhance the reinforcement learning agent's decision-making.

• To make the reinforcement learning approach more practical, the authors incorporate "industrial solutions" - insights and guidance from traffic engineers and domain experts. This includes things like:

  • Defining appropriate reward functions that align with real-world objectives
  • Providing initial policies or actions that are more likely to be effective
  • Incorporating constraints and domain knowledge to guide the agent's exploration and learning

• The authors also draw inspiration from other related work, such as DynamicLight, DataLight, CityLight, and LLM-Assisted-Light, which have explored various techniques for data-driven and adaptive traffic signal control.

Critical Analysis

• The authors acknowledge that directly applying reinforcement learning to real-world traffic signal control can be challenging, as the environment is complex and the agent's actions can have significant impacts on traffic flow and safety.

• By incorporating expert guidance and domain knowledge, the authors aim to make the reinforcement learning approach more practical and deployable. However, the extent to which this guidance can be effectively integrated and the impact it has on the agent's performance is still an open question.

• The authors also note that their proposed framework, GuideLight, has not yet been evaluated in a real-world deployment. Further research and testing would be necessary to understand the true benefits and limitations of this approach in a live traffic environment.

Conclusion

• The GuideLight framework presented in this paper represents a promising approach to improving traffic signal control by combining reinforcement learning with expert guidance from traffic engineers and domain experts.

• By leveraging both data-driven and knowledge-based techniques, the authors aim to develop a more robust and practical traffic signal control system that can adapt to changing traffic conditions and better meet the needs of real-world transportation networks.

• Overall, this research contributes to the ongoing efforts to make traffic signal control more intelligent, efficient, and responsive, with the potential to reduce congestion, improve safety, and enhance the overall driving experience for users.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

GuideLight: Industrial Solution Guidance for More Practical Traffic Signal Control Agents
Total Score

0

GuideLight: Industrial Solution Guidance for More Practical Traffic Signal Control Agents

Haoyuan Jiang, Xuantang Xiong, Ziyue Li, Hangyu Mao, Guanghu Sui, Jingqing Ruan, Yuheng Cheng, Hua Wei, Wolfgang Ketter, Rui Zhao

Currently, traffic signal control (TSC) methods based on reinforcement learning (RL) have proven superior to traditional methods. However, most RL methods face difficulties when applied in the real world due to three factors: input, output, and the cycle-flow relation. The industry's observable input is much more limited than simulation-based RL methods. For real-world solutions, only flow can be reliably collected, whereas common RL methods need more. For the output action, most RL methods focus on acyclic control, which real-world signal controllers do not support. Most importantly, industry standards require a consistent cycle-flow relationship: non-decreasing and different response strategies for low, medium, and high-level flows, which is ignored by the RL methods. To narrow the gap between RL methods and industry standards, we innovatively propose to use industry solutions to guide the RL agent. Specifically, we design behavior cloning and curriculum learning to guide the agent to mimic and meet industry requirements and, at the same time, leverage the power of exploration and exploitation in RL for better performance. We theoretically prove that such guidance can largely decrease the sample complexity to polynomials in the horizon when searching for an optimal policy. Our rigid experiments show that our method has good cycle-flow relation and superior performance.

Read more

7/16/2024

iLLM-TSC: Integration reinforcement learning and large language model for traffic signal control policy improvement
Total Score

0

iLLM-TSC: Integration reinforcement learning and large language model for traffic signal control policy improvement

Aoyu Pang, Maonan Wang, Man-On Pun, Chung Shue Chen, Xi Xiong

Urban congestion remains a critical challenge, with traffic signal control (TSC) emerging as a potent solution. TSC is often modeled as a Markov Decision Process problem and then solved using reinforcement learning (RL), which has proven effective. However, the existing RL-based TSC system often overlooks imperfect observations caused by degraded communication, such as packet loss, delays, and noise, as well as rare real-life events not included in the reward function, such as unconsidered emergency vehicles. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel integration framework that combines a large language model (LLM) with RL. This framework is designed to manage overlooked elements in the reward function and gaps in state information, thereby enhancing the policies of RL agents. In our approach, RL initially makes decisions based on observed data. Subsequently, LLMs evaluate these decisions to verify their reasonableness. If a decision is found to be unreasonable, it is adjusted accordingly. Additionally, this integration approach can be seamlessly integrated with existing RL-based TSC systems without necessitating modifications. Extensive testing confirms that our approach reduces the average waiting time by $17.5%$ in degraded communication conditions as compared to traditional RL methods, underscoring its potential to advance practical RL applications in intelligent transportation systems. The related code can be found at url{https://github.com/Traffic-Alpha/iLLM-TSC}.

Read more

7/9/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

DynamicLight: Two-Stage Dynamic Traffic Signal Timing

Liang Zhang, Yutong Zhang, Shubin Xie, Jianming Deng, Chen Li

Reinforcement learning (RL) is gaining popularity as an effective approach for traffic signal control (TSC) and is increasingly applied in this domain. However, most existing RL methodologies are confined to a single-stage TSC framework, primarily focusing on selecting an appropriate traffic signal phase at fixed action intervals, leading to inflexible and less adaptable phase durations. To address such limitations, we introduce a novel two-stage TSC framework named DynamicLight. This framework initiates with a phase control strategy responsible for determining the optimal traffic phase, followed by a duration control strategy tasked with determining the corresponding phase duration. Experimental results show that DynamicLight outperforms state-of-the-art TSC models and exhibits exceptional model generalization capabilities. Additionally, the robustness and potential for real-world implementation of DynamicLight are further demonstrated and validated through various DynamicLight variants. The code is released at https://github.com/LiangZhang1996/DynamicLight.

Read more

5/3/2024

Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Using Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Using Reinforcement Learning

Muhammad Tahir Rafique, Ahmed Mustafa, Hasan Sajid

The growing demand for road use in urban areas has led to significant traffic congestion, posing challenges that are costly to mitigate through infrastructure expansion alone. As an alternative, optimizing existing traffic management systems, particularly through adaptive traffic signal control, offers a promising solution. This paper explores the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to enhance traffic signal operations at intersections, aiming to reduce congestion without extensive sensor networks. We introduce two RL-based algorithms: a turn-based agent, which dynamically prioritizes traffic signals based on real-time queue lengths, and a time-based agent, which adjusts signal phase durations according to traffic conditions while following a fixed phase cycle. By representing the state as a scalar queue length, our approach simplifies the learning process and lowers deployment costs. The algorithms were tested in four distinct traffic scenarios using seven evaluation metrics to comprehensively assess performance. Simulation results demonstrate that both RL algorithms significantly outperform conventional traffic signal control systems, highlighting their potential to improve urban traffic flow efficiently.

Read more

9/4/2024