Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey

Read original: arXiv:2409.18169 - Published 9/30/2024 by Tiansheng Huang, Sihao Hu, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin, Ling Liu
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The research paper discusses the serious safety concerns that arise from the nascent fine-tuning-as-a-service business model.
  • Fine-tuning a model over a few harmful data uploaded by users can compromise the safety alignment of the model, leading to a "harmful fine-tuning" attack.
  • The research community has shown broad interest in this new attack, but the authors observe misunderstandings within the community about this attack setting.
  • The paper aims to clarify common concerns and formally establish the research problem.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new type of attack on machine learning models called "harmful fine-tuning." Fine-tuning is a common technique where a pre-trained model is further trained on a smaller dataset to specialize it for a specific task.

The authors explain that in the emerging "fine-tuning-as-a-service" business model, users can upload their own data to fine-tune a model. However, if a user uploads even a small amount of "harmful" data, it can significantly degrade the safety and alignment of the fine-tuned model. This is known as the "harmful fine-tuning" attack.

The authors note that while this attack has generated broad interest, there are still misunderstandings within the research community about it. The paper aims to clarify the threat model, introduce the attack and its variants, and survey existing work on attacks, defenses, and analysis related to this issue.

Technical Explanation

The paper first presents the threat model for the harmful fine-tuning attack. In this setting, a user can upload a small amount of "harmful" data to fine-tune a pre-trained language model. This harmful data can contain biased, toxic, or adversarial content that, when used to fine-tune the model, can significantly degrade its safety and alignment.

The authors then introduce the harmful fine-tuning attack and describe several variants, such as targeted attacks that aim to induce specific undesirable behaviors. They systematically survey the existing literature on attacks, defenses, and analysis related to this problem.

The paper also outlines future research directions that could contribute to understanding and mitigating the harmful fine-tuning attack, such as developing better techniques for detecting and filtering out harmful data during fine-tuning. The authors provide a curated list of relevant papers on the topic.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises an important concern about the safety implications of the fine-tuning-as-a-service business model. The harmful fine-tuning attack is a new and potentially serious threat that has not been fully explored.

While the paper provides a good overview of the problem and existing research, it acknowledges that the attack is still relatively new, and there may be general misunderstandings within the research community. Additional research is needed to better understand the extent of the problem and develop effective defenses.

One limitation of the paper is that it does not provide a detailed analysis of the specific types of harmful data that could be used in these attacks or the potential consequences of such attacks. Further research could investigate the characteristics of harmful data and the real-world impact of successful attacks.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential trade-offs or unintended consequences that may arise from implementing defenses against harmful fine-tuning. For example, overly restrictive data filtering could limit the benefits of fine-tuning or introduce other safety risks.

Overall, the paper serves as a valuable starting point for understanding the harmful fine-tuning attack and the need for continued research in this area to ensure the safety and reliability of large language models.

Conclusion

The research paper highlights a significant safety concern arising from the fine-tuning-as-a-service business model. The harmful fine-tuning attack, where a small amount of malicious data can degrade the safety and alignment of a fine-tuned model, has garnered broad interest in the research community.

However, the authors note that there are still general misunderstandings about this attack setting. By clarifying the threat model, introducing the attack and its variants, and surveying existing work, the paper aims to establish a solid foundation for further research in this area.

Addressing the harmful fine-tuning attack is crucial to ensuring the safe and responsible development of large language models, which are becoming increasingly important in various applications. The paper's outline of future research directions and the provided list of relevant papers can help guide the community towards finding effective solutions to this emerging challenge.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey

Tiansheng Huang, Sihao Hu, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin, Ling Liu

Recent research demonstrates that the nascent fine-tuning-as-a-service business model exposes serious safety concerns -- fine-tuning over a few harmful data uploaded by the users can compromise the safety alignment of the model. The attack, known as harmful fine-tuning, has raised a broad research interest among the community. However, as the attack is still new, textbf{we observe from our miserable submission experience that there are general misunderstandings within the research community.} We in this paper aim to clear some common concerns for the attack setting, and formally establish the research problem. Specifically, we first present the threat model of the problem, and introduce the harmful fine-tuning attack and its variants. Then we systematically survey the existing literature on attacks/defenses/mechanical analysis of the problem. Finally, we outline future research directions that might contribute to the development of the field. Additionally, we present a list of questions of interest, which might be useful to refer to when reviewers in the peer review process question the realism of the experiment/attack/defense setting. A curated list of relevant papers is maintained and made accessible at: url{https://github.com/git-disl/awesome_LLM-harmful-fine-tuning-papers.}

Read more

9/30/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Mimicking User Data: On Mitigating Fine-Tuning Risks in Closed Large Language Models

Francisco Eiras, Aleksandar Petrov, Phillip H. S. Torr, M. Pawan Kumar, Adel Bibi

Fine-tuning large language models on small, high-quality datasets can enhance their performance on specific downstream tasks. Recent research shows that fine-tuning on benign, instruction-following data can inadvertently undo the safety alignment process and increase a model's propensity to comply with harmful queries. Although critical, understanding and mitigating safety risks in well-defined tasks remains distinct from the instruction-following context due to structural differences in the data. Our work addresses the gap in our understanding of these risks across diverse types of data in closed models - where providers control how user data is utilized in the fine-tuning process. We demonstrate how malicious actors can subtly manipulate the structure of almost any task-specific dataset to foster significantly more dangerous model behaviors, while maintaining an appearance of innocuity and reasonable downstream task performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel mitigation strategy that mixes in safety data which mimics the task format and prompting style of the user data, showing this is more effective than existing baselines at re-establishing safety alignment while maintaining similar task performance.

Read more

7/2/2024

Multitask Mayhem: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Gaps in LLMs Fine-tuning
Total Score

0

Multitask Mayhem: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Gaps in LLMs Fine-tuning

Essa Jan, Nouar AlDahoul, Moiz Ali, Faizan Ahmad, Fareed Zaffar, Yasir Zaki

Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adoption across a wide range of tasks, ranging from code generation to machine translation and sentiment analysis, etc. Red teaming/Safety alignment efforts show that fine-tuning models on benign (non-harmful) data could compromise safety. However, it remains unclear to what extent this phenomenon is influenced by different variables, including fine-tuning task, model calibrations, etc. This paper explores the task-wise safety degradation due to fine-tuning on downstream tasks such as summarization, code generation, translation, and classification across various calibration. Our results reveal that: 1) Fine-tuning LLMs for code generation and translation leads to the highest degradation in safety guardrails. 2) LLMs generally have weaker guardrails for translation and classification, with 73-92% of harmful prompts answered, across baseline and other calibrations, falling into one of two concern categories. 3) Current solutions, including guards and safety tuning datasets, lack cross-task robustness. To address these issues, we developed a new multitask safety dataset effectively reducing attack success rates across a range of tasks without compromising the model's overall helpfulness. Our work underscores the need for generalized alignment measures to ensure safer and more robust models.

Read more

9/25/2024

Turning Generative Models Degenerate: The Power of Data Poisoning Attacks
Total Score

0

Turning Generative Models Degenerate: The Power of Data Poisoning Attacks

Shuli Jiang, Swanand Ravindra Kadhe, Yi Zhou, Farhan Ahmed, Ling Cai, Nathalie Baracaldo

The increasing use of large language models (LLMs) trained by third parties raises significant security concerns. In particular, malicious actors can introduce backdoors through poisoning attacks to generate undesirable outputs. While such attacks have been extensively studied in image domains and classification tasks, they remain underexplored for natural language generation (NLG) tasks. To address this gap, we conduct an investigation of various poisoning techniques targeting the LLM's fine-tuning phase via prefix-tuning, a Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method. We assess their effectiveness across two generative tasks: text summarization and text completion; and we also introduce new metrics to quantify the success and stealthiness of such NLG poisoning attacks. Through our experiments, we find that the prefix-tuning hyperparameters and trigger designs are the most crucial factors to influence attack success and stealthiness. Moreover, we demonstrate that existing popular defenses are ineffective against our poisoning attacks. Our study presents the first systematic approach to understanding poisoning attacks targeting NLG tasks during fine-tuning via PEFT across a wide range of triggers and attack settings. We hope our findings will aid the AI security community in developing effective defenses against such threats.

Read more

7/19/2024