HealMe: Harnessing Cognitive Reframing in Large Language Models for Psychotherapy
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the performance of AI-powered psychotherapy systems.
- It looks at metrics for assessing AI-to-AI and real-world conversations.
- The research provides insights into the challenges and opportunities of using AI for mental health interventions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to evaluate the effectiveness of AI systems designed for psychotherapy and mental health support. It examines different metrics for assessing AI-to-AI conversations as well as metrics for evaluating real-world conversations between AI assistants and human users.
The goal is to understand how well these AI systems can engage in meaningful therapeutic dialogues and provide helpful support. This research is important because it can help improve the development and deployment of AI-powered mental health interventions, which have the potential to expand access to care. However, the paper also acknowledges the challenges and limitations of using AI in this sensitive domain.
Technical Explanation
The paper outlines several evaluation metrics for assessing AI-to-AI conversations in the context of psychotherapy. These include measures of empathy, emotional understanding, and adherence to therapeutic principles. The researchers also propose metrics for evaluating real-world conversations between AI assistants and human users, such as user satisfaction, perceived helpfulness, and clinical outcomes.
By testing AI systems against these various metrics, the researchers aim to gain insights into the current capabilities and limitations of AI-powered mental health interventions. This information can inform the development of more effective and ethical AI systems for therapeutic applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the significant challenges of using AI for psychotherapy, given the inherent complexity and nuance of human psychology and mental health. While the proposed evaluation metrics provide a framework for assessing AI performance, the authors note that these measures may not fully capture the subjective and interpersonal nature of therapeutic relationships.
Further research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of AI-based mental health interventions and how they compare to traditional human-provided care. Additionally, ethical considerations around privacy, data use, and the potential for harm must be carefully addressed.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable contribution to the emerging field of AI-powered mental health interventions. By developing and testing evaluation metrics, the researchers are working to ensure that these technologies can be deployed safely and effectively to support people's wellbeing. However, the limitations and challenges identified in the paper highlight the importance of continued interdisciplinary collaboration and a thoughtful, nuanced approach to the use of AI in this sensitive domain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
HealMe: Harnessing Cognitive Reframing in Large Language Models for Psychotherapy
Mengxi Xiao, Qianqian Xie, Ziyan Kuang, Zhicheng Liu, Kailai Yang, Min Peng, Weiguang Han, Jimin Huang
Large Language Models (LLMs) can play a vital role in psychotherapy by adeptly handling the crucial task of cognitive reframing and overcoming challenges such as shame, distrust, therapist skill variability, and resource scarcity. Previous LLMs in cognitive reframing mainly converted negative emotions to positive ones, but these approaches have limited efficacy, often not promoting clients' self-discovery of alternative perspectives. In this paper, we unveil the Helping and Empowering through Adaptive Language in Mental Enhancement (HealMe) model. This novel cognitive reframing therapy method effectively addresses deep-rooted negative thoughts and fosters rational, balanced perspectives. Diverging from traditional LLM methods, HealMe employs empathetic dialogue based on psychotherapeutic frameworks. It systematically guides clients through distinguishing circumstances from feelings, brainstorming alternative viewpoints, and developing empathetic, actionable suggestions. Moreover, we adopt the first comprehensive and expertly crafted psychological evaluation metrics, specifically designed to rigorously assess the performance of cognitive reframing, in both AI-simulated dialogues and real-world therapeutic conversations. Experimental results show that our model outperforms others in terms of empathy, guidance, and logical coherence, demonstrating its effectiveness and potential positive impact on psychotherapy.
Read more7/30/2024
📈
0
Facilitating Self-Guided Mental Health Interventions Through Human-Language Model Interaction: A Case Study of Cognitive Restructuring
Ashish Sharma, Kevin Rushton, Inna Wanyin Lin, Theresa Nguyen, Tim Althoff
Self-guided mental health interventions, such as do-it-yourself tools to learn and practice coping strategies, show great promise to improve access to mental health care. However, these interventions are often cognitively demanding and emotionally triggering, creating accessibility barriers that limit their wide-scale implementation and adoption. In this paper, we study how human-language model interaction can support self-guided mental health interventions. We take cognitive restructuring, an evidence-based therapeutic technique to overcome negative thinking, as a case study. In an IRB-approved randomized field study on a large mental health website with 15,531 participants, we design and evaluate a system that uses language models to support people through various steps of cognitive restructuring. Our findings reveal that our system positively impacts emotional intensity for 67% of participants and helps 65% overcome negative thoughts. Although adolescents report relatively worse outcomes, we find that tailored interventions that simplify language model generations improve overall effectiveness and equity.
Read more4/12/2024
💬
0
Chain of Empathy: Enhancing Empathetic Response of Large Language Models Based on Psychotherapy Models
Yoon Kyung Lee, Inju Lee, Minjung Shin, Seoyeon Bae, Sowon Hahn
We present a novel method, the Chain of Empathy (CoE) prompting, that utilizes insights from psychotherapy to induce Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason about human emotional states. This method is inspired by various psychotherapy approaches including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), Person Centered Therapy (PCT), and Reality Therapy (RT), each leading to different patterns of interpreting clients' mental states. LLMs without reasoning generated predominantly exploratory responses. However, when LLMs used CoE reasoning, we found a more comprehensive range of empathetic responses aligned with the different reasoning patterns of each psychotherapy model. The CBT based CoE resulted in the most balanced generation of empathetic responses. The findings underscore the importance of understanding the emotional context and how it affects human and AI communication. Our research contributes to understanding how psychotherapeutic models can be incorporated into LLMs, facilitating the development of context-specific, safer, and empathetic AI.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Are Large Language Models Possible to Conduct Cognitive Behavioral Therapy?
Hao Shen, Zihan Li, Minqiang Yang, Minghui Ni, Yongfeng Tao, Zhengyang Yu, Weihao Zheng, Chen Xu, Bin Hu
In contemporary society, the issue of psychological health has become increasingly prominent, characterized by the diversification, complexity, and universality of mental disorders. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), currently the most influential and clinically effective psychological treatment method with no side effects, has limited coverage and poor quality in most countries. In recent years, researches on the recognition and intervention of emotional disorders using large language models (LLMs) have been validated, providing new possibilities for psychological assistance therapy. However, are LLMs truly possible to conduct cognitive behavioral therapy? Many concerns have been raised by mental health experts regarding the use of LLMs for therapy. Seeking to answer this question, we collected real CBT corpus from online video websites, designed and conducted a targeted automatic evaluation framework involving the evaluation of emotion tendency of generated text, structured dialogue pattern and proactive inquiry ability. For emotion tendency, we calculate the emotion tendency score of the CBT dialogue text generated by each model. For structured dialogue pattern, we use a diverse range of automatic evaluation metrics to compare speaking style, the ability to maintain consistency of topic and the use of technology in CBT between different models . As for inquiring to guide the patient, we utilize PQA (Proactive Questioning Ability) metric. We also evaluated the CBT ability of the LLM after integrating a CBT knowledge base to explore the help of introducing additional knowledge to enhance the model's CBT counseling ability. Four LLM variants with excellent performance on natural language processing are evaluated, and the experimental result shows the great potential of LLMs in psychological counseling realm, especially after combining with other technological means.
Read more7/26/2024