Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles

Read original: arXiv:2408.11182 - Published 8/22/2024 by Zhilong Wang, Haizhou Wang, Nanqing Luo, Lan Zhang, Xiaoyan Sun, Yebo Cao, Peng Liu
Total Score

0

Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines how attackers can "jailbreak" or bypass the safeguards in large language models (LLMs) to generate malicious content
  • Introduces a novel "neural carrier" technique to disguise malicious goals within benign narratives
  • Demonstrates how this approach can be used to bypass content moderation systems and generate harmful outputs

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how attackers can bypass the safeguards and restrictions built into large language models (LLMs) to generate malicious content. It introduces a novel technique called "neural carriers" that allows them to hide their true, harmful intentions within seemingly benign narratives.

The key idea is to train a separate language model to act as a "carrier" that can disguise the malicious goal within a more innocent-sounding story or context. This allows the attacker to bypass content moderation systems that are designed to detect and block harmful outputs from the LLM.

Through experiments, the researchers demonstrate how this "jailbreaking" approach can be used to generate a wide range of malicious content, from hate speech to explicit instructions for illegal activities. The paper highlights the challenges in defending against such sophisticated attacks that exploit the inner workings of these powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing background on the growing capabilities and deployment of large language models (LLMs) and the importance of building safety and security measures to prevent their misuse. It then introduces the concept of "jailbreaking" - bypassing the protective mechanisms designed to restrict LLMs from generating harmful outputs.

The core technical contribution is the "neural carrier" approach, where the researchers train a separate language model to act as a "carrier" that can disguise a malicious goal within a benign narrative. This carrier model is then used in conjunction with the target LLM to produce the final, seemingly innocuous output that actually contains the hidden, harmful intent.

The paper describes the architecture and training process for these neural carriers, as well as the experiments conducted to evaluate their effectiveness. The results demonstrate how this technique can be used to generate a wide range of malicious content, including hate speech, explicit instructions for illegal activities, and other outputs that bypass content moderation systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important concerns about the potential for malicious actors to exploit the capabilities of large language models for nefarious purposes. The "neural carrier" approach represents a sophisticated attack vector that highlights the challenges in building robust defenses against such adversarial techniques.

One potential limitation of the research is the focus on a specific type of attack, which may not capture the full range of ways that LLMs could be "jailbroken." Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into potential mitigation strategies or the broader implications for the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.

That said, the work underscores the critical need for continued research and innovation in the area of AI safety and security. As language models become more advanced and ubiquitous, it is essential that the research community, industry, and policymakers work together to address these emerging threats and ensure these technologies are used for the benefit of society.

Conclusion

The paper "Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles" presents a concerning vulnerability in large language models that could be exploited by malicious actors. The novel "neural carrier" technique demonstrates how attackers can bypass content moderation systems by disguising harmful intentions within seemingly innocuous narratives.

While the research highlights significant challenges in defending against such sophisticated attacks, it also underscores the importance of continued efforts to ensure the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems. As language models become increasingly ubiquitous, addressing the security and safety implications will be crucial to realizing their full potential for positive societal impact.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles
Total Score

0

Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles

Zhilong Wang, Haizhou Wang, Nanqing Luo, Lan Zhang, Xiaoyan Sun, Yebo Cao, Peng Liu

Jailbreak attacks on Language Model Models (LLMs) entail crafting prompts aimed at exploiting the models to generate malicious content. This paper proposes a new type of jailbreak attacks which shift the attention of the LLM by inserting a prohibited query into a carrier article. The proposed attack leverage the knowledge graph and a composer LLM to automatically generating a carrier article that is similar to the topic of the prohibited query but does not violate LLM's safeguards. By inserting the malicious query to the carrier article, the assembled attack payload can successfully jailbreak LLM. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we leverage 4 popular categories of ``harmful behaviors'' adopted by related researches to attack 6 popular LLMs. Our experiment results show that the proposed attacking method can successfully jailbreak all the target LLMs which high success rate, except for Claude-3.

Read more

8/22/2024

Hidden You Malicious Goal Into Benigh Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Logic Chain Injection
Total Score

0

Hidden You Malicious Goal Into Benigh Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Logic Chain Injection

Zhilong Wang, Yebo Cao, Peng Liu

Jailbreak attacks on Language Model Models (LLMs) entail crafting prompts aimed at exploiting the models to generate malicious content. Existing jailbreak attacks can successfully deceive the LLMs, however they cannot deceive the human. This paper proposes a new type of jailbreak attacks which can deceive both the LLMs and human (i.e., security analyst). The key insight of our idea is borrowed from the social psychology - that is human are easily deceived if the lie is hidden in truth. Based on this insight, we proposed the logic-chain injection attacks to inject malicious intention into benign truth. Logic-chain injection attack firstly dissembles its malicious target into a chain of benign narrations, and then distribute narrations into a related benign article, with undoubted facts. In this way, newly generate prompt cannot only deceive the LLMs, but also deceive human.

Read more

4/9/2024

Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
Total Score

0

Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey

Sibo Yi, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Tianshuo Cong, Xinlei He, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks, including question answering, translation, code completion, etc. However, the over-assistance of LLMs has raised the challenge of jailbreaking, which induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society by designing adversarial prompts. With the emergence of jailbreak attack methods exploiting different vulnerabilities in LLMs, the corresponding safety alignment measures are also evolving. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods. For instance, the attack methods are divided into black-box and white-box attacks based on the transparency of the target model. Meanwhile, we classify defense methods into prompt-level and model-level defenses. Additionally, we further subdivide these attack and defense methods into distinct sub-classes and present a coherent diagram illustrating their relationships. We also conduct an investigation into the current evaluation methods and compare them from different perspectives. Our findings aim to inspire future research and practical implementations in safeguarding LLMs against adversarial attacks. Above all, although jailbreak remains a significant concern within the community, we believe that our work enhances the understanding of this domain and provides a foundation for developing more secure LLMs.

Read more

9/2/2024

Large Language Models Are Involuntary Truth-Tellers: Exploiting Fallacy Failure for Jailbreak Attacks
Total Score

0

Large Language Models Are Involuntary Truth-Tellers: Exploiting Fallacy Failure for Jailbreak Attacks

Yue Zhou, Henry Peng Zou, Barbara Di Eugenio, Yang Zhang

We find that language models have difficulties generating fallacious and deceptive reasoning. When asked to generate deceptive outputs, language models tend to leak honest counterparts but believe them to be false. Exploiting this deficiency, we propose a jailbreak attack method that elicits an aligned language model for malicious output. Specifically, we query the model to generate a fallacious yet deceptively real procedure for the harmful behavior. Since a fallacious procedure is generally considered fake and thus harmless by LLMs, it helps bypass the safeguard mechanism. Yet the output is factually harmful since the LLM cannot fabricate fallacious solutions but proposes truthful ones. We evaluate our approach over five safety-aligned large language models, comparing four previous jailbreak methods, and show that our approach achieves competitive performance with more harmful outputs. We believe the findings could be extended beyond model safety, such as self-verification and hallucination.

Read more

7/2/2024