High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise

Overview

• Stochastic first-order methods are common for training large-scale machine learning models
• Random behavior can lead to highly suboptimal results, even though theoretical guarantees are usually for the expected objective value
• It's important to ensure algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability
• Existing methods for non-smooth stochastic convex optimization have complexity bounds with negative-power or logarithmic dependence on confidence level, under an assumption of sub-Gaussian noise that may not hold in practice

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, we often use algorithms that make random choices during the training process. While these algorithms have theoretical guarantees on the expected performance, a particular run of the algorithm may still result in a very poor outcome. This paper aims to address this issue by developing new methods that can ensure the algorithm performs well with high probability, even if the noise in the data doesn't follow a specific distribution.

The key challenge is that existing methods for non-smooth optimization problems (where the objective function is not smooth) have complexity bounds that depend on the confidence level in a way that is either negative-power or logarithmic. This means that to get a high-probability guarantee, the algorithm has to run for a very long time. The authors of this paper resolve this issue by proposing new step-size rules for two stochastic optimization methods, along with an analysis that works for more general objective functions and can also handle strongly convex problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces two new stochastic optimization methods with gradient clipping, and provides high-probability convergence guarantees for these methods in the setting of non-smooth, non-strongly convex optimization problems with non-sub-Gaussian (heavy-tailed) noise.

The first method is an accelerated stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm, and the second is a proximal stochastic gradient method. For both methods, the authors derive step-size rules that lead to logarithmic dependence on the confidence level in the high-probability convergence bounds. This is in contrast to previous results, which had either negative-power or logarithmic dependence under the additional assumption of sub-Gaussian noise.

The analysis in the paper also covers generalized smooth objectives with Hölder-continuous gradients, and provides extensions for strongly convex problems. Additionally, the authors show that the first (accelerated) method has optimal iteration and oracle complexity in all regimes, while the second method is optimal in the non-smooth setting.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important practical concern in machine learning, where the theoretical guarantees on algorithm performance may not always translate to reliable performance in practice. By relaxing the sub-Gaussian noise assumption, the authors have expanded the applicability of their methods to a wider range of real-world scenarios.

However, the analysis in the paper relies on several assumptions, such as Hölder-continuity of the gradients, which may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the paper does not provide experimental validation of the proposed methods, which would be helpful to assess their practical performance and compare them to existing approaches.

Overall, this research makes an important theoretical contribution, but further empirical investigation and analysis of the method's limitations would be valuable to fully understand its practical implications.

Conclusion

This paper presents new stochastic optimization methods with high-probability convergence guarantees for non-smooth, non-strongly convex problems with heavy-tailed noise. By relaxing the common sub-Gaussian assumption, the authors have developed algorithms that are more widely applicable to real-world machine learning scenarios.

The theoretical analysis establishes optimal complexity bounds for the proposed methods, which is a significant advancement over previous results. While the paper does not include empirical validation, the theoretical contributions are an important step forward in ensuring the reliable performance of stochastic optimization algorithms in practice.