Hitchhiker's guide on Energy-Based Models: a comprehensive review on the relation with other generative models, sampling and statistical physics
2406.13661
0
0
Abstract
Energy-Based Models (EBMs) have emerged as a powerful framework in the realm of generative modeling, offering a unique perspective that aligns closely with principles of statistical mechanics. This review aims to provide physicists with a comprehensive understanding of EBMs, delineating their connection to other generative models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), and Normalizing Flows. We explore the sampling techniques crucial for EBMs, including Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, and draw parallels between EBM concepts and statistical mechanics, highlighting the significance of energy functions and partition functions. Furthermore, we delve into state-of-the-art training methodologies for EBMs, covering recent advancements and their implications for enhanced model performance and efficiency. This review is designed to clarify the often complex interconnections between these models, which can be challenging due to the diverse communities working on the topic.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive review of energy-based models (EBMs), a type of generative model used in machine learning.
- It explores the relationship between EBMs and other generative models, as well as their connection to statistical physics and sampling methods.
- The paper aims to serve as a "hitchhiker's guide" to help researchers and practitioners navigate the complex landscape of EBMs.
Plain English Explanation
Energy-based models (EBMs) are a powerful type of machine learning model that can be used to generate new data, such as images or text. Unlike some other generative models, EBMs don't directly generate the data, but instead learn an "energy function" that assigns low energy to desired data points and high energy to undesirable ones. This energy function can then be used to sample new data points that have low energy, effectively generating new content.
One of the key benefits of EBMs is their flexibility - they can be used to model a wide range of probability distributions, and can be combined with other techniques like diffusion models or hierarchical latent spaces to improve their performance. They also have connections to the field of statistical physics, which can provide useful insights and techniques.
However, EBMs can be challenging to train and sample from, and the paper aims to provide a comprehensive guide to help researchers navigate these challenges. It covers topics like the relationship between EBMs and other generative models, techniques for sampling from EBMs, and the use of EBMs in uncertainty estimation and model calibration.
Overall, this paper is a valuable resource for anyone interested in using or understanding energy-based models, and could help researchers develop more powerful and versatile generative models for a wide range of applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of energy-based models (EBMs), which are a class of generative models that learn an "energy function" over the data, rather than directly generating new samples. This energy function assigns low energy to desired data points and high energy to undesirable ones, and can then be used to sample new data points with low energy.
The authors then explore the relationship between EBMs and other generative models, such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs). They show that EBMs can be seen as a more general framework that encompasses these other models, and can potentially offer advantages in terms of flexibility and scalability.
The paper also delves into the connections between EBMs and statistical physics, noting that the energy function in an EBM can be interpreted as a physical energy function, and that techniques from statistical physics can be used to sample from and optimize EBMs. The authors discuss various sampling methods, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Langevin dynamics, and how they can be applied to EBMs.
Additionally, the paper explores the use of EBMs in tasks like uncertainty estimation and model calibration. For example, the authors discuss how the energy function in an EBM can be used to quantify the epistemic uncertainty of a graph neural network, and how EBMs can be used to calibrate the uncertainty estimates of a variational autoencoder.
Throughout the paper, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature on EBMs, covering a wide range of topics and applications. They also highlight areas for further research, such as the development of more efficient sampling methods and the integration of EBMs with other machine learning techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-structured overview of energy-based models, covering a wide range of topics and highlighting the key advantages and challenges of this approach. The authors do a commendable job of explaining the connections between EBMs and other generative models, as well as the relationship to statistical physics, which can help readers gain a deeper understanding of the underlying principles and potential applications of EBMs.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the theoretical and technical aspects of EBMs, without delving too deeply into practical implementation details or case studies. While the authors do discuss some applications, such as uncertainty estimation and model calibration, a more extensive exploration of real-world use cases could have provided additional insights and practical guidance for researchers and practitioners.
Additionally, the paper does not directly address some of the potential challenges or limitations of EBMs, such as their computational complexity, the difficulty of training and optimizing them, or the potential for mode collapse or instability during the sampling process. A more critical discussion of these issues, along with potential solutions or mitigation strategies, could have further strengthened the paper's value to the research community.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper is an excellent resource for anyone interested in understanding the foundations and potential of energy-based models. The authors' clear and comprehensive approach, combined with the extensive literature review and thoughtful analysis, make this paper a valuable addition to the field of machine learning and generative modeling.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive and insightful review of energy-based models, a powerful class of generative models with a strong connection to statistical physics. The authors explore the relationship between EBMs and other generative models, as well as the various techniques and applications of these models, including their use in uncertainty estimation and model calibration.
The paper serves as a valuable "hitchhiker's guide" for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding and working with energy-based models. By covering a wide range of topics, from the theoretical underpinnings to the practical challenges and potential solutions, the authors have created a resource that can help guide the development and deployment of these models in a wide range of applications.
While the paper could have delved deeper into some of the practical and critical aspects of EBMs, its comprehensive approach and clear, accessible writing make it a must-read for anyone seeking to expand their knowledge and understanding of this important area of machine learning research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Improving Adversarial Energy-Based Model via Diffusion Process
Cong Geng, Tian Han, Peng-Tao Jiang, Hao Zhang, Jinwei Chen, S{o}ren Hauberg, Bo Li
0
0
Generative models have shown strong generation ability while efficient likelihood estimation is less explored. Energy-based models~(EBMs) define a flexible energy function to parameterize unnormalized densities efficiently but are notorious for being difficult to train. Adversarial EBMs introduce a generator to form a minimax training game to avoid expensive MCMC sampling used in traditional EBMs, but a noticeable gap between adversarial EBMs and other strong generative models still exists. Inspired by diffusion-based models, we embedded EBMs into each denoising step to split a long-generated process into several smaller steps. Besides, we employ a symmetric Jeffrey divergence and introduce a variational posterior distribution for the generator's training to address the main challenges that exist in adversarial EBMs. Our experiments show significant improvement in generation compared to existing adversarial EBMs, while also providing a useful energy function for efficient density estimation.
6/11/2024
π
Learning Latent Space Hierarchical EBM Diffusion Models
Jiali Cui, Tian Han
0
0
This work studies the learning problem of the energy-based prior model and the multi-layer generator model. The multi-layer generator model, which contains multiple layers of latent variables organized in a top-down hierarchical structure, typically assumes the Gaussian prior model. Such a prior model can be limited in modelling expressivity, which results in a gap between the generator posterior and the prior model, known as the prior hole problem. Recent works have explored learning the energy-based (EBM) prior model as a second-stage, complementary model to bridge the gap. However, the EBM defined on a multi-layer latent space can be highly multi-modal, which makes sampling from such marginal EBM prior challenging in practice, resulting in ineffectively learned EBM. To tackle the challenge, we propose to leverage the diffusion probabilistic scheme to mitigate the burden of EBM sampling and thus facilitate EBM learning. Our extensive experiments demonstrate a superior performance of our diffusion-learned EBM prior on various challenging tasks.
5/29/2024
π§
Energy-based Epistemic Uncertainty for Graph Neural Networks
Dominik Fuchsgruber, Tom Wollschlager, Stephan Gunnemann
0
0
In domains with interdependent data, such as graphs, quantifying the epistemic uncertainty of a Graph Neural Network (GNN) is challenging as uncertainty can arise at different structural scales. Existing techniques neglect this issue or only distinguish between structure-aware and structure-agnostic uncertainty without combining them into a single measure. We propose GEBM, an energy-based model (EBM) that provides high-quality uncertainty estimates by aggregating energy at different structural levels that naturally arise from graph diffusion. In contrast to logit-based EBMs, we provably induce an integrable density in the data space by regularizing the energy function. We introduce an evidential interpretation of our EBM that significantly improves the predictive robustness of the GNN. Our framework is a simple and effective post hoc method applicable to any pre-trained GNN that is sensitive to various distribution shifts. It consistently achieves the best separation of in-distribution and out-of-distribution data on 6 out of 7 anomaly types while having the best average rank over shifts on emph{all} datasets.
7/2/2024
πΏ
Energy-Calibrated VAE with Test Time Free Lunch
Yihong Luo, Siya Qiu, Xingjian Tao, Yujun Cai, Jing Tang
0
0
In this paper, we propose a novel generative model that utilizes a conditional Energy-Based Model (EBM) for enhancing Variational Autoencoder (VAE), termed Energy-Calibrated VAE (EC-VAE). Specifically, VAEs often suffer from blurry generated samples due to the lack of a tailored training on the samples generated in the generative direction. On the other hand, EBMs can generate high-quality samples but require expensive Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. To address these issues, we introduce a conditional EBM for calibrating the generative direction of VAE during training, without requiring it for the generation at test time. In particular, we train EC-VAE upon both the input data and the calibrated samples with adaptive weight to enhance efficacy while avoiding MCMC sampling at test time. Furthermore, we extend the calibration idea of EC-VAE to variational learning and normalizing flows, and apply EC-VAE to an additional application of zero-shot image restoration via neural transport prior and range-null theory. We evaluate the proposed method with two applications, including image generation and zero-shot image restoration, and the experimental results show that our method achieves competitive performance over single-step non-adversarial generation. Our code is available at https://github.com/DJ-LYH/EC-VAE.
4/9/2024