Honeyquest: Rapidly Measuring the Enticingness of Cyber Deception Techniques with Code-based Questionnaires

Overview

• Cyber deception techniques like honeytokens can slow down cyber attacks and provide strong signs of compromise, but are often poorly specified.
• Realistically measuring the effectiveness of these techniques requires a well-exposed software system and production-ready implementation, which is challenging for rapid prototyping.
• The researchers translated 25 cyber deception techniques into a high-level, machine-readable specification and created an open-source tool called Honeyquest to quickly evaluate their enticingness.
• They conducted an experiment with 47 humans to test the enticingness of the 25 deception techniques and 19 true security risks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on cyber deception techniques, which are methods used to trick or mislead cyber attackers. One example is a honeytoken, a fake piece of valuable data that is designed to lure attackers.

These deception techniques can help slow down attacks and provide clear signs that an attack is occurring, but they are often not well-defined or easy to implement. Properly testing the effectiveness of these techniques requires setting up a realistic software system and implementing the deception methods, which can be challenging.

To address this, the researchers created a tool called Honeyquest that allows them to quickly evaluate the "enticingness" of different deception techniques without having to fully implement them. They translated 25 existing deception techniques and 12 new ones into a standardized, machine-readable format.

The researchers then ran an experiment with 47 people to test how enticing these 25 deception techniques and 19 real security vulnerabilities were. This allowed them to replicate the goals of previous work on deception techniques without needing to build complex software systems.

The key finding was that the presence of cyber deception can reduce the risk that attackers will find a real security vulnerability by about 22% on average. This suggests that deception techniques can be an effective way to slow down and detect cyber attacks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for specifying and evaluating cyber deception techniques in a standardized way. The researchers translated 13 previously researched and 12 self-defined deception techniques into a high-level, machine-readable specification.

They then developed an open-source tool called Honeyquest that allows researchers to quickly evaluate the "enticingness" of these deception techniques without having to fully implement them on a real software system. This addresses the challenge of rapid prototyping and testing of deception techniques, which typically requires a well-exposed software system and production-ready implementation.

The researchers conducted an experiment with 47 human participants to test the enticingness of the 25 cyber deception techniques and 19 true security risks. This allowed them to replicate the goals of previous work on deception techniques without the time-consuming implementation on actual computer systems.

The key findings from the experiment were:

• The researchers successfully replicated many consistent findings from previous work on cyber deception.
• The presence of cyber deception can significantly reduce the risk that adversaries will find a true security risk by about 22% on average.
• The experiment provided valuable insights for the design of enticing deception techniques.

Critical Analysis

One limitation of the research is that the experiment was conducted with a relatively small sample size of 47 participants. While this was sufficient to replicate previous findings, a larger and more diverse sample may be needed to fully validate the effectiveness of the deception techniques.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical concerns around the use of deception techniques, even if they are intended to protect against cyber attacks. There could be privacy or trust implications that should be carefully considered.

Further research could also explore the long-term effectiveness of these techniques. Cyber attackers may adapt their tactics over time to overcome the deceptions, so the durability of the approach is an important factor to investigate.

Overall, the researchers have made a valuable contribution by providing a standardized framework and tool for rapidly prototyping and evaluating cyber deception techniques. However, the ethical and practical considerations of deploying these techniques in real-world settings warrant further examination.

Conclusion

This paper presents a framework and tool for specifying and evaluating cyber deception techniques in a standardized way. The researchers translated 25 deception techniques into a machine-readable format and developed an open-source tool called Honeyquest to quickly test their enticingness.

Through an experiment with 47 participants, the researchers were able to replicate the goals of previous work on deception techniques without the need for a complex software implementation. The key finding was that the presence of cyber deception can significantly reduce the risk that attackers will find a true security vulnerability by about 22% on average.

This suggests that deception techniques could be an effective way to slow down and detect cyber attacks. However, the ethical and long-term implications of these techniques require further exploration. Overall, this research provides a valuable foundation for rapidly prototyping and evaluating cyber deception approaches.