How Do Students Interact with an LLM-powered Virtual Teaching Assistant in Different Educational Settings?

Read original: arXiv:2407.17429 - Published 7/29/2024 by Pratyusha Maiti, Ashok K. Goel
Total Score

0

How Do Students Interact with an LLM-powered Virtual Teaching Assistant in Different Educational Settings?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how students interact with an LLM-powered virtual teaching assistant in different educational settings.
  • The study examines the effectiveness of using large language models (LLMs) to create virtual teaching assistants that can engage with students and support their learning.
  • The researchers investigate the impact of these virtual assistants on student outcomes, learning experiences, and perceptions across various educational contexts.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how students would interact with an AI-powered virtual teaching assistant in different classroom settings. They created a virtual assistant that uses a large language model (LLM) to engage with students and support their learning.

The virtual assistant was tested in various educational environments, such as [link to "https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/jill-watson-virtual-teaching-assistant-powered-by"]introductory computer science courses[/link] and [link to "https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/tamigo-empowering-teaching-assistants-using-llm-assisted"]programming education[/link]. The researchers looked at how the virtual assistant affected student performance, their experiences learning with the AI, and their overall perceptions of the technology.

The goal was to see if these LLM-powered virtual assistants could be effective tools for enhancing teaching and learning, especially in areas where [link to "https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/desirable-characteristics-ai-teaching-assistants-programming-education"]traditional teaching assistants may face challenges[/link].

Technical Explanation

The study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the performance and impact of the LLM-powered virtual teaching assistant. In the [link to "https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/evaluating-effectiveness-llms-introductory-computer-science-education"]introductory computer science course[/link], the researchers compared student learning outcomes, engagement, and perceptions between sections that used the virtual assistant and those that did not.

The virtual assistant was designed to provide personalized support, answer questions, and guide students through course materials. The LLM technology allowed the assistant to engage in natural language interactions, understand context, and provide relevant and helpful responses.

In the [link to "https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/tamigo-empowering-teaching-assistants-using-llm-assisted"]programming education[/link] setting, the researchers explored how the virtual assistant could work alongside human teaching assistants to enhance their capabilities and support students more effectively.

The study collected both quantitative data, such as test scores and engagement metrics, as well as qualitative feedback from students and instructors through surveys and interviews.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. One key limitation is the relatively small sample size and the fact that the study was conducted in specific educational contexts, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Additionally, the paper notes that more research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of using LLM-powered virtual assistants, particularly in terms of student learning retention and the development of critical thinking skills.

There are also potential concerns around the ethical implications of using AI-powered teaching assistants, such as issues of bias, privacy, and the impact on human-to-human interactions in the classroom. The paper suggests that these areas should be carefully considered and addressed in future work.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the potential of using LLM-powered virtual teaching assistants to enhance educational experiences and outcomes. The findings suggest that these AI-based assistants can be effective in supporting student learning, engagement, and perceptions, particularly in areas where traditional teaching assistants may face challenges.

However, the research also highlights the need for continued investigation into the long-term impacts, ethical considerations, and optimal integration of these technologies within educational settings. As [link to "https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/courseassist-pedagogically-appropriate-ai-tutor-computer-science"]AI-powered educational tools[/link] continue to evolve, it will be crucial to ensure they are designed and deployed in ways that truly benefit students and support effective teaching and learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How Do Students Interact with an LLM-powered Virtual Teaching Assistant in Different Educational Settings?
Total Score

0

How Do Students Interact with an LLM-powered Virtual Teaching Assistant in Different Educational Settings?

Pratyusha Maiti, Ashok K. Goel

Jill Watson, a virtual teaching assistant powered by LLMs, answers student questions and engages them in extended conversations on courseware provided by the instructors. In this paper, we analyze student interactions with Jill across multiple courses and colleges, focusing on the types and complexity of student questions based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy and tool usage patterns. We find that, by supporting a wide range of cognitive demands, Jill encourages students to engage in sophisticated, higher-order cognitive questions. However, the frequency of usage varies significantly across deployments, and the types of questions asked depend on course-specific contexts. These findings pave the way for future work on AI-driven educational tools tailored to individual learning styles and course structure, potentially enhancing both the teaching and learning experience in classrooms.

Read more

7/29/2024

Jill Watson: A Virtual Teaching Assistant powered by ChatGPT
Total Score

0

Jill Watson: A Virtual Teaching Assistant powered by ChatGPT

Karan Taneja, Pratyusha Maiti, Sandeep Kakar, Pranav Guruprasad, Sanjeev Rao, Ashok K. Goel

Conversational AI agents often require extensive datasets for training that are not publicly released, are limited to social chit-chat or handling a specific domain, and may not be easily extended to accommodate the latest advances in AI technologies. This paper introduces Jill Watson, a conversational Virtual Teaching Assistant (VTA) leveraging the capabilities of ChatGPT. Jill Watson based on ChatGPT requires no prior training and uses a modular design to allow the integration of new APIs using a skill-based architecture inspired by XiaoIce. Jill Watson is also well-suited for intelligent textbooks as it can process and converse using multiple large documents. We exclusively utilize publicly available resources for reproducibility and extensibility. Comparative analysis shows that our system outperforms the legacy knowledge-based Jill Watson as well as the OpenAI Assistants service. We employ many safety measures that reduce instances of hallucinations and toxicity. The paper also includes real-world examples from a classroom setting that demonstrate different features of Jill Watson and its effectiveness.

Read more

5/21/2024

Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLMs in Introductory Computer Science Education: A Semester-Long Field Study
Total Score

0

Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLMs in Introductory Computer Science Education: A Semester-Long Field Study

Wenhan Lyu (Rachel), Yimeng Wang (Rachel), Tingting (Rachel), Chung, Yifan Sun, Yixuan Zhang

The integration of AI assistants, especially through the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), into computer science education has sparked significant debate. An emerging body of work has looked into using LLMs in education, but few have examined the impacts of LLMs on students in entry-level programming courses, particularly in real-world contexts and over extended periods. To address this research gap, we conducted a semester-long, between-subjects study with 50 students using CodeTutor, an LLM-powered assistant developed by our research team. Our study results show that students who used CodeTutor (the experimental group) achieved statistically significant improvements in their final scores compared to peers who did not use the tool (the control group). Within the experimental group, those without prior experience with LLM-powered tools demonstrated significantly greater performance gain than their counterparts. We also found that students expressed positive feedback regarding CodeTutor's capability, though they also had concerns about CodeTutor's limited role in developing critical thinking skills. Over the semester, students' agreement with CodeTutor's suggestions decreased, with a growing preference for support from traditional human teaching assistants. Our analysis further reveals that the quality of user prompts was significantly correlated with CodeTutor's response effectiveness. Building upon our results, we discuss the implications of our findings for integrating Generative AI literacy into curricula to foster critical thinking skills and turn to examining the temporal dynamics of user engagement with LLM-powered tools. We further discuss the discrepancy between the anticipated functions of tools and students' actual capabilities, which sheds light on the need for tailored strategies to improve educational outcomes.

Read more

5/6/2024

TAMIGO: Empowering Teaching Assistants using LLM-assisted viva and code assessment in an Advanced Computing Class
Total Score

0

TAMIGO: Empowering Teaching Assistants using LLM-assisted viva and code assessment in an Advanced Computing Class

Anishka IIITD, Diksha Sethi, Nipun Gupta, Shikhar Sharma, Srishti Jain, Ujjwal Singhal, Dhruv Kumar

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly transformed the educational landscape, offering new tools for students, instructors, and teaching assistants. This paper investigates the application of LLMs in assisting teaching assistants (TAs) with viva and code assessments in an advanced computing class on distributed systems in an Indian University. We develop TAMIGO, an LLM-based system for TAs to evaluate programming assignments. For viva assessment, the TAs generated questions using TAMIGO and circulated these questions to the students for answering. The TAs then used TAMIGO to generate feedback on student answers. For code assessment, the TAs selected specific code blocks from student code submissions and fed it to TAMIGO to generate feedback for these code blocks. The TAMIGO-generated feedback for student answers and code blocks was used by the TAs for further evaluation. We evaluate the quality of LLM-generated viva questions, model answers, feedback on viva answers, and feedback on student code submissions. Our results indicate that LLMs are highly effective at generating viva questions when provided with sufficient context and background information. However, the results for LLM-generated feedback on viva answers were mixed; instances of hallucination occasionally reduced the accuracy of feedback. Despite this, the feedback was consistent, constructive, comprehensive, balanced, and did not overwhelm the TAs. Similarly, for code submissions, the LLM-generated feedback was constructive, comprehensive and balanced, though there was room for improvement in aligning the feedback with the instructor-provided rubric for code evaluation. Our findings contribute to understanding the benefits and limitations of integrating LLMs into educational settings.

Read more

7/25/2024