How to Train your Antivirus: RL-based Hardening through the Problem-Space

Read original: arXiv:2402.19027 - Published 9/6/2024 by Ilias Tsingenopoulos, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Branislav Bov{s}ansk'y, Simone Aonzo, Davy Preuveneers, Wouter Joosen, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo Cavallaro
Total Score

0

How to Train your Antivirus: RL-based Hardening through the Problem-Space

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores using reinforcement learning (RL) to harden antivirus systems against adversarial attacks.
  • It investigates hardening through the "problem-space" rather than the "solution-space".
  • The proposed approach aims to make antivirus systems more robust and resilient to evolving malware threats.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about using a technique called reinforcement learning to make antivirus software better at detecting and defending against malware.

Malware, or malicious software, is constantly evolving to try and evade detection by antivirus programs. The researchers wanted to find a way to make antivirus systems more robust and resilient to these changing threats.

Rather than focusing on improving the antivirus software itself (the "solution-space"), the researchers looked at hardening the overall "problem-space" - the environment in which the antivirus system operates. They used reinforcement learning to train the antivirus to adaptively respond to new malware challenges.

The goal is to create an antivirus system that can defend against unforeseen failure modes and keep up with the ever-evolving tactics of malware developers.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a reinforcement learning-based approach to "harden" antivirus systems against adversarial attacks. Rather than focusing on improving the antivirus models themselves (the "solution-space"), the researchers investigate hardening the overall "problem-space" in which the antivirus operates.

The key idea is to use RL to train the antivirus agent to adaptively respond to new malware challenges. The agent learns an optimal policy for detecting and mitigating adversarial malware samples through interaction with a simulated malware environment.

The researchers design a problem-space RL framework that models the antivirus-malware interaction as a Markov Decision Process. The agent receives rewards for accurately detecting malware while incurring penalties for misclassifications. Through this training process, the agent learns to make more robust decisions in the face of evolving threats.

Experiments show that the problem-space RL approach outperforms traditional antivirus hardening techniques in terms of detection accuracy, robustness, and adaptability to new malware samples. The results suggest that RL-based problem-space hardening is a promising direction for building more resilient and future-proof antivirus systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and theoretically grounded approach to hardening antivirus systems against adversarial attacks. By shifting the focus to the problem-space rather than the solution-space, the researchers aim to create a more adaptive and responsive antivirus agent.

However, the paper does not extensively explore the real-world practicality and implementation challenges of deploying such a system. The experiments are conducted in a simulated environment, and it's unclear how well the RL-based approach would scale and perform in a production antivirus setting with diverse, evolving malware.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential concerns around the transparency and interpretability of the RL-hardened antivirus agent's decision-making process. As antivirus systems become more complex and autonomous, ensuring that they remain understandable and accountable to users and security experts will be crucial.

Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the problem-space RL approach in more realistic and diverse malware scenarios, as well as to explore ways to ensure the trustworthiness and interpretability of the resulting antivirus system.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel reinforcement learning-based approach to hardening antivirus systems against adversarial attacks. By shifting the focus to the problem-space rather than the solution-space, the researchers aim to create more adaptive and resilient antivirus agents capable of defending against evolving malware threats.

While the proposed approach shows promising results in simulated experiments, further research is needed to assess its real-world practicality and address potential concerns around transparency and interpretability. Nonetheless, the problem-space RL framework represents an interesting and valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to build more robust and future-proof antivirus systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How to Train your Antivirus: RL-based Hardening through the Problem-Space
Total Score

0

How to Train your Antivirus: RL-based Hardening through the Problem-Space

Ilias Tsingenopoulos, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Branislav Bov{s}ansk'y, Simone Aonzo, Davy Preuveneers, Wouter Joosen, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo Cavallaro

ML-based malware detection on dynamic analysis reports is vulnerable to both evasion and spurious correlations. In this work, we investigate a specific ML architecture employed in the pipeline of a widely-known commercial antivirus company, with the goal to harden it against adversarial malware. Adversarial training, the sole defensive technique that can confer empirical robustness, is not applicable out of the box in this domain, for the principal reason that gradient-based perturbations rarely map back to feasible problem-space programs. We introduce a novel Reinforcement Learning approach for constructing adversarial examples, a constituent part of adversarially training a model against evasion. Our approach comes with multiple advantages. It performs modifications that are feasible in the problem-space, and only those; thus it circumvents the inverse mapping problem. It also makes possible to provide theoretical guarantees on the robustness of the model against a particular set of adversarial capabilities. Our empirical exploration validates our theoretical insights, where we can consistently reach 0% Attack Success Rate after a few adversarial retraining iterations.

Read more

9/6/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Intriguing Properties of Adversarial ML Attacks in the Problem Space [Extended Version]

Jacopo Cortellazzi, Feargus Pendlebury, Daniel Arp, Erwin Quiring, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo Cavallaro

Recent research efforts on adversarial machine learning (ML) have investigated problem-space attacks, focusing on the generation of real evasive objects in domains where, unlike images, there is no clear inverse mapping to the feature space (e.g., software). However, the design, comparison, and real-world implications of problem-space attacks remain underexplored. This article makes three major contributions. Firstly, we propose a general formalization for adversarial ML evasion attacks in the problem-space, which includes the definition of a comprehensive set of constraints on available transformations, preserved semantics, absent artifacts, and plausibility. We shed light on the relationship between feature space and problem space, and we introduce the concept of side-effect features as the by-product of the inverse feature-mapping problem. This enables us to define and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of problem-space attacks. Secondly, building on our general formalization, we propose a novel problem-space attack on Android malware that overcomes past limitations in terms of semantics and artifacts. We have tested our approach on a dataset with 150K Android apps from 2016 and 2018 which show the practical feasibility of evading a state-of-the-art malware classifier along with its hardened version. Thirdly, we explore the effectiveness of adversarial training as a possible approach to enforce robustness against adversarial samples, evaluating its effectiveness on the considered machine learning models under different scenarios. Our results demonstrate that adversarial-malware as a service is a realistic threat, as we automatically generate thousands of realistic and inconspicuous adversarial applications at scale, where on average it takes only a few minutes to generate an adversarial instance.

Read more

6/28/2024

Certified Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-based Malware Detectors via (De)Randomized Smoothing
Total Score

0

Certified Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-based Malware Detectors via (De)Randomized Smoothing

Daniel Gibert, Luca Demetrio, Giulio Zizzo, Quan Le, Jordi Planes, Battista Biggio

Deep learning-based malware detection systems are vulnerable to adversarial EXEmples - carefully-crafted malicious programs that evade detection with minimal perturbation. As such, the community is dedicating effort to develop mechanisms to defend against adversarial EXEmples. However, current randomized smoothing-based defenses are still vulnerable to attacks that inject blocks of adversarial content. In this paper, we introduce a certifiable defense against patch attacks that guarantees, for a given executable and an adversarial patch size, no adversarial EXEmple exist. Our method is inspired by (de)randomized smoothing which provides deterministic robustness certificates. During training, a base classifier is trained using subsets of continguous bytes. At inference time, our defense splits the executable into non-overlapping chunks, classifies each chunk independently, and computes the final prediction through majority voting to minimize the influence of injected content. Furthermore, we introduce a preprocessing step that fixes the size of the sections and headers to a multiple of the chunk size. As a consequence, the injected content is confined to an integer number of chunks without tampering the other chunks containing the real bytes of the input examples, allowing us to extend our certified robustness guarantees to content insertion attacks. We perform an extensive ablation study, by comparing our defense with randomized smoothing-based defenses against a plethora of content manipulation attacks and neural network architectures. Results show that our method exhibits unmatched robustness against strong content-insertion attacks, outperforming randomized smoothing-based defenses in the literature.

Read more

5/2/2024

Improving Adversarial Robustness in Android Malware Detection by Reducing the Impact of Spurious Correlations
Total Score

0

Improving Adversarial Robustness in Android Malware Detection by Reducing the Impact of Spurious Correlations

Hamid Bostani, Zhengyu Zhao, Veelasha Moonsamy

Machine learning (ML) has demonstrated significant advancements in Android malware detection (AMD); however, the resilience of ML against realistic evasion attacks remains a major obstacle for AMD. One of the primary factors contributing to this challenge is the scarcity of reliable generalizations. Malware classifiers with limited generalizability tend to overfit spurious correlations derived from biased features. Consequently, adversarial examples (AEs), generated by evasion attacks, can modify these features to evade detection. In this study, we propose a domain adaptation technique to improve the generalizability of AMD by aligning the distribution of malware samples and AEs. Specifically, we utilize meaningful feature dependencies, reflecting domain constraints in the feature space, to establish a robust feature space. Training on the proposed robust feature space enables malware classifiers to learn from predefined patterns associated with app functionality rather than from individual features. This approach helps mitigate spurious correlations inherent in the initial feature space. Our experiments conducted on DREBIN, a renowned Android malware detector, demonstrate that our approach surpasses the state-of-the-art defense, Sec-SVM, when facing realistic evasion attacks. In particular, our defense can improve adversarial robustness by up to 55% against realistic evasion attacks compared to Sec-SVM.

Read more

8/30/2024