On human-centred security: A new systems model based on modes and mode transitions
2405.02043
0
0
š
Abstract
We propose an abstract conceptual framework for analysing complex security systems using a new notion of modes and mode transitions. A mode is an independent component of a system with its own objectives, monitoring data, algorithms, and scope and limits. The behaviour of a mode, including its transitions to other modes, is determined by interpretations of the mode's monitoring data in the light of its objectives and capabilities -- these interpretations we call beliefs. We formalise the conceptual framework mathematically and, by quantifying and visualising beliefs in higher-dimensional geometric spaces, we argue our models may help both design, analyse and explain systems. The mathematical models are based on simplicial complexes.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
ā¢ This paper presents a new systems model for human-centered security that focuses on different modes of operation and transitions between them.
ā¢ The model aims to provide a framework for understanding how security systems, technology, and human users interact in complex ways.
ā¢ The researchers argue that this mode-based approach is more comprehensive than traditional models that only consider a single "secure" mode of operation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way of thinking about security systems that takes into account the different ways people use and interact with these systems. Rather than just focusing on a single "secure" mode, the researchers propose a model that recognizes there are multiple modes of operation, and that transitions between these modes are an important part of how security systems function in the real world.
The key insight is that security systems don't exist in a vacuum - they are part of a complex sociotechnical system that involves both technology and human users. How people actually use security systems in practice can be quite different from how the systems are designed to be used. The mode-based model aims to capture these real-world dynamics and provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding and designing security systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper's central argument is that traditional models of security systems are too narrow, focusing only on a single "secure" mode of operation. In contrast, the researchers propose a new systems model based on different "modes" that the system and its users can occupy, as well as the transitions between these modes.
The model identifies several key modes, including:
- Secure mode: The system is operating as intended, with all security measures in place.
- Usable mode: The system is optimized for usability, potentially at the expense of some security.
- Emergency mode: The system shifts to a simpler, more streamlined state to deal with a crisis.
- Maintenance mode: The system is undergoing updates, repairs, or other maintenance activities.
The transitions between these modes are a crucial part of the model, as they represent the ways in which the system and its users adapt to changing circumstances and requirements. The authors argue that these mode transitions are an essential aspect of human-centered security that has been overlooked in previous frameworks.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the limitations of traditional security models and the need for a more nuanced, human-centered approach. By considering the different modes of operation and the transitions between them, the proposed model provides a richer and more realistic representation of how security systems function in practice.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical challenges of implementing this mode-based approach. Transitioning between modes may introduce new vulnerabilities or complexities that need to be carefully managed. Additionally, the model may be difficult to apply in certain domains or contexts, and further research may be needed to assess its broader applicability.
Furthermore, the paper does not address the potential tensions or trade-offs that may arise between the different modes, such as the balance between security and usability. Navigating these trade-offs will be a key challenge in designing effective human-centered security systems.
Conclusion
Overall, the paper presents a promising new systems model for human-centered security that recognizes the complex and dynamic nature of security systems. By shifting the focus from a single "secure" mode to a broader consideration of different modes and mode transitions, the researchers offer a more comprehensive framework for understanding and designing security systems that better reflect the realities of how people interact with them in practice.
This mode-based approach has the potential to inform the development of more robust and adaptable security solutions that can better accommodate the needs and behaviors of human users. However, further research will be needed to address the practical challenges and limitations identified in the paper.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Mathematical Framework for the Problem of Security for Cognition in Neurotechnology
Bryce Allen Bagley
0
0
The rapid advancement in neurotechnology in recent years has created an emerging critical intersection between neurotechnology and security. Implantable devices, non-invasive monitoring, and non-invasive therapies all carry with them the prospect of violating the privacy and autonomy of individuals' cognition. A growing number of scientists and physicians have made calls to address this issue, but applied efforts have been relatively limited. A major barrier hampering scientific and engineering efforts to address Cognitive Security is the lack of a clear means of describing and analyzing relevant problems. In this paper we develop Cognitive Security, a mathematical framework which enables such description and analysis by drawing on methods and results from multiple fields. We demonstrate certain statistical properties which have significant implications for Cognitive Security, and then present descriptions of the algorithmic problems faced by attackers attempting to violate privacy and autonomy, and defenders attempting to obstruct such attempts.
4/23/2024
A Data-to-Product Multimodal Conceptual Framework to Achieve Automated Software Evolution for Context-rich Intelligent Applications
Songhui Yue
0
0
While AI is extensively transforming Software Engineering (SE) fields, SE is still in need of a framework to overall consider all phases to facilitate Automated Software Evolution (ASEv), particularly for intelligent applications that are context-rich, instead of conquering each division independently. Its complexity comes from the intricacy of the intelligent applications, the heterogeneity of the data sources, and the constant changes in the context. This study proposes a conceptual framework for achieving automated software evolution, emphasizing the importance of multimodality learning. A Selective Sequential Scope Model (3S) model is developed based on the conceptual framework, and it can be used to categorize existing and future research when it covers different SE phases and multimodal learning tasks. This research is a preliminary step toward the blueprint of a higher-level ASEv. The proposed conceptual framework can act as a practical guideline for practitioners to prepare themselves for diving into this area. Although the study is about intelligent applications, the framework and analysis methods may be adapted for other types of software as AI brings more intelligence into their life cycles.
4/23/2024
š¤Æ
Communication Modalities
Roman Kuznets
0
0
Epistemic analysis of distributed systems is one of the biggest successes among applications of logic in computer science. The reason for that is that agents' actions are necessarily guided by their knowledge. Thus, epistemic modal logic, with its knowledge and belief modalities (and group versions thereof), has played a vital role in establishing both impossibility results and necessary conditions for solvable distributed tasks. In distributed systems, knowledge is largely attained via communication. It has been standard in both distributed systems and dynamic epistemic logic to treat incoming messages as trustworthy, thus, creating difficulties in the epistemic analysis of byzantine distributed systems where faulty agents may lie. In this paper, we argue that handling such communication scenarios calls for additional modalities representing the informational content of messages that should not be taken at face value. We present two such modalities: hope for the case of fully byzantine agents and creed for non-uniform communication protocols in general.
5/7/2024
Unbridled Icarus: A Survey of the Potential Perils of Image Inputs in Multimodal Large Language Model Security
Yihe Fan, Yuxin Cao, Ziyu Zhao, Ziyao Liu, Shaofeng Li
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities that increasingly influence various aspects of our daily lives, constantly defining the new boundary of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Image modalities, enriched with profound semantic information and a more continuous mathematical nature compared to other modalities, greatly enhance the functionalities of MLLMs when integrated. However, this integration serves as a double-edged sword, providing attackers with expansive vulnerabilities to exploit for highly covert and harmful attacks. The pursuit of reliable AI systems like powerful MLLMs has emerged as a pivotal area of contemporary research. In this paper, we endeavor to demostrate the multifaceted risks associated with the incorporation of image modalities into MLLMs. Initially, we delineate the foundational components and training processes of MLLMs. Subsequently, we construct a threat model, outlining the security vulnerabilities intrinsic to MLLMs. Moreover, we analyze and summarize existing scholarly discourses on MLLMs' attack and defense mechanisms, culminating in suggestions for the future research on MLLM security. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to deepen the academic understanding of MLLM security challenges and propel forward the development of trustworthy MLLM systems.
4/9/2024