Humboldt: Metadata-Driven Extensible Data Discovery

Overview

• Data discovery is crucial for data management and analysis, and can benefit from better use of metadata.
• Users may want to search data based on various metadata, like table creators, endorsers, and data quality.
• Effectively surfacing metadata through interactive user interfaces (UIs) to aid data discovery poses challenges.
• Constantly updating UIs with changes to metadata sources consumes development resources and lacks scalability.

Plain English Explanation

Metadata is information about data, like who created it, how it's related to other data, and how reliable it is. Being able to easily search and browse this metadata can be very helpful when looking for specific data. For example, a user might want to find all the sales data that was created by Alex and approved by Mike.

However, building user interfaces (UIs) that can display and interact with all this metadata is challenging. Whenever the metadata changes, the UI often needs to be updated, which requires a lot of development work and isn't very scalable.

To address this, the researchers introduce a new framework called Humboldt. Humboldt allows data discovery UIs to leverage metadata without needing to be constantly updated. It automatically generates interactive data discovery interfaces based on the available metadata, saving time and effort.

Technical Explanation

Humboldt is a framework that decouples metadata sources from the implementation of data discovery UIs. It allows data systems to leverage metadata for search and dataset visualization without having to rebuild their UIs every time the metadata changes.

Humboldt uses declarative specifications to describe the metadata that should be surfaced in the UI. It then automatically generates the interactive data discovery interfaces based on these specifications, avoiding the need for costly metadata-specific implementations.

This approach provides several benefits:

• Flexibility: Humboldt can adapt to changes in metadata sources without requiring UI rewrites.
• Scalability: The automated UI generation scales to support growing metadata without additional development effort.
• Extensibility: New metadata features can be added by updating the declarative specifications, without modifying the core UI implementation.

Critical Analysis

The paper does not address potential limitations or challenges with the Humboldt framework. For example, it's unclear how Humboldt would handle complex or evolving metadata schemas, or how it would integrate with existing data discovery systems.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed evaluation of Humboldt's performance or user experience compared to traditional, manually-built data discovery UIs. More empirical evidence on the benefits and tradeoffs of the Humboldt approach would strengthen the research.

Further research could also explore how Humboldt's declarative specifications could be made more intuitive and accessible for non-technical users who need to configure the data discovery interfaces.

Conclusion

The Humboldt framework presents a promising approach to democratizing access to knowledge graphs and other metadata sources for data discovery. By decoupling metadata from UI implementation, Humboldt aims to make data discovery systems more flexible, scalable, and extensible.

While the paper lacks some critical analysis and empirical validation, the core idea of automatically generating data discovery UIs from declarative specifications is an interesting contribution that could significantly improve the way users interact with and explore complex data ecosystems.