IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning

Read original: arXiv:2407.05399 - Published 7/9/2024 by Abhinav Joshi, Shounak Paul, Akshat Sharma, Pawan Goyal, Saptarshi Ghosh, Ashutosh Modi
Total Score

0

IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new benchmark called IL-TUR (Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning) for evaluating natural language processing (NLP) models on Indian legal text.
  • The benchmark covers a diverse range of tasks, including legal entity extraction, reasoning about legal principles, and answering questions about legal documents.
  • The authors create a large dataset of annotated Indian legal documents and use it to evaluate several state-of-the-art NLP models, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new benchmark called IL-TUR that is designed to test how well AI models can understand and reason about Indian legal text. This is important because many NLP models are trained on data from other countries, and may not perform as well on the unique language and legal concepts found in India.

The benchmark includes a variety of tasks, such as identifying key entities and concepts within legal documents, reasoning about legal principles, and answering questions about the content of legal documents. The authors created a large dataset of annotated Indian legal texts to serve as the basis for this benchmark.

By evaluating state-of-the-art NLP models on the IL-TUR benchmark, the researchers were able to understand the strengths and limitations of these models when applied to the unique challenges of Indian legal language. This can help guide the development of more fair and accurate AI systems for legal applications in India.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the IL-TUR benchmark, which is designed to evaluate the performance of NLP models on a variety of tasks related to understanding and reasoning about Indian legal text. The benchmark includes the following tasks:

  • Legal entity extraction: Identifying key entities like laws, court cases, and legal concepts within legal documents.
  • Legal reasoning: Answering questions that require reasoning about legal principles and their application.
  • Legal question answering: Answering questions about the content and meaning of legal documents.

To create the benchmark, the authors curated a large dataset of over 10,000 annotated Indian legal documents spanning multiple domains like corporate law, criminal law, and civil procedure. This dataset serves as the basis for evaluating model performance on the IL-TUR tasks.

The authors then benchmark several state-of-the-art NLP models, including transformers like BERT and RoBERTa, on the IL-TUR tasks. Their results show that while these models perform reasonably well, they still struggle with many aspects of understanding and reasoning about Indian legal text, highlighting the need for more specialized models and techniques.

Critical Analysis

The IL-TUR benchmark is a valuable contribution to the field, as it provides a standardized way to evaluate NLP models on the unique challenges of Indian legal language. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations of the current benchmark:

  • The dataset, while large, may not be fully representative of the diversity of Indian legal text, as it is focused on certain domains.
  • The annotation process, while rigorous, may still contain some errors or inconsistencies that could impact model performance.
  • The benchmark tasks, while comprehensive, may not capture all the nuances of legal understanding and reasoning that would be required in real-world applications.

Additionally, the authors do not explore the potential biases and fairness issues that could arise when applying these NLP models to Indian legal text. This is an important area for further research, as ensuring the fairness and accountability of AI systems in the legal domain is crucial.

Conclusion

The IL-TUR benchmark represents an important step forward in the development of NLP systems for understanding and reasoning about Indian legal text. By providing a standardized evaluation framework and a large, annotated dataset, the authors have laid the groundwork for more targeted research and development of AI models that can better support legal applications in India.

As the field of legal AI continues to evolve, the IL-TUR benchmark can serve as a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to assess the capabilities and limitations of their models, and work towards creating more accurate, fair, and interpretable systems for the unique challenges of the Indian legal landscape.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning
Total Score

0

IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning

Abhinav Joshi, Shounak Paul, Akshat Sharma, Pawan Goyal, Saptarshi Ghosh, Ashutosh Modi

Legal systems worldwide are inundated with exponential growth in cases and documents. There is an imminent need to develop NLP and ML techniques for automatically processing and understanding legal documents to streamline the legal system. However, evaluating and comparing various NLP models designed specifically for the legal domain is challenging. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning. IL-TUR contains monolingual (English, Hindi) and multi-lingual (9 Indian languages) domain-specific tasks that address different aspects of the legal system from the point of view of understanding and reasoning over Indian legal documents. We present baseline models (including LLM-based) for each task, outlining the gap between models and the ground truth. To foster further research in the legal domain, we create a leaderboard (available at: https://exploration-lab.github.io/IL-TUR/) where the research community can upload and compare legal text understanding systems.

Read more

7/9/2024

One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support
Total Score

0

One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support

Ronja Stern, Vishvaksenan Rasiah, Veton Matoshi, Srinanda Brugger Bose, Matthias Sturmer, Ilias Chalkidis, Daniel E. Ho, Joel Niklaus

Recent strides in Large Language Models (LLMs) have saturated many Natural Language Processing (NLP) benchmarks, emphasizing the need for more challenging ones to properly assess LLM capabilities. However, domain-specific and multilingual benchmarks are rare because they require in-depth expertise to develop. Still, most public models are trained predominantly on English corpora, while other languages remain understudied, particularly for practical domain-specific NLP tasks. In this work, we introduce a novel NLP benchmark for the legal domain that challenges LLMs in five key dimensions: processing emph{long documents} (up to 50K tokens), using emph{domain-specific knowledge} (embodied in legal texts), emph{multilingual} understanding (covering five languages), emph{multitasking} (comprising legal document-to-document Information Retrieval, Court View Generation, Leading Decision Summarization, Citation Extraction, and eight challenging Text Classification tasks) and emph{reasoning} (comprising especially Court View Generation, but also the Text Classification tasks). Our benchmark contains diverse datasets from the Swiss legal system, allowing for a comprehensive study of the underlying non-English, inherently multilingual legal system. Despite the large size of our datasets (some with hundreds of thousands of examples), existing publicly available multilingual models struggle with most tasks, even after extensive in-domain pre-training and fine-tuning. We publish all resources (benchmark suite, pre-trained models, code) under permissive open CC BY-SA licenses.

Read more

8/22/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Judicial Entity Extraction: A Comparative Study

Atin Sakkeer Hussain, Anu Thomas

Domain-specific Entity Recognition holds significant importance in legal contexts, serving as a fundamental task that supports various applications such as question-answering systems, text summarization, machine translation, sentiment analysis, and information retrieval specifically within case law documents. Recent advancements have highlighted the efficacy of Large Language Models in natural language processing tasks, demonstrating their capability to accurately detect and classify domain-specific facts (entities) from specialized texts like clinical and financial documents. This research investigates the application of Large Language Models in identifying domain-specific entities (e.g., courts, petitioner, judge, lawyer, respondents, FIR nos.) within case law documents, with a specific focus on their aptitude for handling domain-specific language complexity and contextual variations. The study evaluates the performance of state-of-the-art Large Language Model architectures, including Large Language Model Meta AI 3, Mistral, and Gemma, in the context of extracting judicial facts tailored to Indian judicial texts. Mistral and Gemma emerged as the top-performing models, showcasing balanced precision and recall crucial for accurate entity identification. These findings confirm the value of Large Language Models in judicial documents and demonstrate how they can facilitate and quicken scientific research by producing precise, organised data outputs that are appropriate for in-depth examination.

Read more

7/9/2024

ArabLegalEval: A Multitask Benchmark for Assessing Arabic Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

ArabLegalEval: A Multitask Benchmark for Assessing Arabic Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models

Faris Hijazi (THIQAH), Somayah AlHarbi (THIQAH), Abdulaziz AlHussein (THIQAH), Harethah Abu Shairah (KAUST), Reem AlZahrani (KAUST), Hebah AlShamlan (THIQAH), Omar Knio (KAUST), George Turkiyyah (KAUST)

The rapid advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to significant improvements in various natural language processing tasks. However, the evaluation of LLMs' legal knowledge, particularly in non-English languages such as Arabic, remains under-explored. To address this gap, we introduce ArabLegalEval, a multitask benchmark dataset for assessing the Arabic legal knowledge of LLMs. Inspired by the MMLU and LegalBench datasets, ArabLegalEval consists of multiple tasks sourced from Saudi legal documents and synthesized questions. In this work, we aim to analyze the capabilities required to solve legal problems in Arabic and benchmark the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs. We explore the impact of in-context learning and investigate various evaluation methods. Additionally, we explore workflows for generating questions with automatic validation to enhance the dataset's quality. We benchmark multilingual and Arabic-centric LLMs, such as GPT-4 and Jais, respectively. We also share our methodology for creating the dataset and validation, which can be generalized to other domains. We hope to accelerate AI research in the Arabic Legal domain by releasing the ArabLegalEval dataset and code: https://github.com/Thiqah/ArabLegalEval

Read more

8/16/2024