IMPACT: Integrated Bottom-Up Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways for Cities

Overview

• Increasing urbanization is putting pressure on cities to prioritize sustainable growth and avoid carbon lock-in.
• Current modeling frameworks fail to provide adequate guidance for local policymakers making critical decisions.
• Researchers typically evaluate policy impacts at the national scale or post-hoc, which cannot forecast emission pathways for specific cities.

Plain English Explanation

As more people move to cities, there is a growing need for urban areas to focus on sustainable development and avoid becoming "locked in" to high-carbon infrastructure and technologies. However, the modeling tools available to help city leaders make decisions are not up to the task. Most research looks at the effects of policies either at the national level or by examining what happened after different policies were implemented in the past. This type of analysis cannot predict how specific policies would impact emissions in a given city, which is the information local policymakers need.

To address this gap, the researchers present the IMPACT pathways model, which takes a "bottom-up" approach with detailed, residence-level data. This model integrates the adoption of sustainable technologies, land use zoning policies, climate change, and changes to the electric grid. By putting the city at the center of the analysis, the researchers are able to identify an "emissions premium" for sprawling development and show that certain policy combinations can actually lead to increased emissions over time, a phenomenon known as "rebounding."

Technical Explanation

The IMPACT pathways model developed by the researchers integrates various factors that influence carbon emissions at the city scale, including technology adoption policies, land use zoning, climate change, and grid decarbonization. Unlike previous research that has typically evaluated policies at the national level or looked at historical outcomes, this model provides a granular, "bottom-up" approach that can forecast emission pathways for specific cities.

The key finding from the IMPACT pathways analysis is the identification of an "emissions premium" associated with sprawling urban development. The researchers also demonstrate that certain combinations of policies can lead to a rebound effect, where emissions increase over time despite the implementation of sustainable measures. This emphasizes the importance of considering the interplay between different policy levers when crafting strategies for low-carbon urban development.

Critical Analysis

The IMPACT pathways model represents an important step forward in providing city-scale emissions forecasting capabilities to support local policymaking. However, the authors acknowledge that the model relies on numerous assumptions and simplifications, which could impact the accuracy of its projections.

Additionally, the model does not appear to account for the carbon footprint of software services that are increasingly important in urban environments, nor does it explore the integration of transportation emissions beyond the built environment. Further research is needed to address these limitations and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the drivers of urban carbon emissions.

Conclusion

The IMPACT pathways model represents a valuable tool for city policymakers seeking to navigate the complex task of transitioning to a low-carbon future. By integrating multiple factors that influence urban emissions at a granular level, the model can help identify effective policy combinations and avoid unintended consequences like the rebound effect. As cities continue to grapple with the challenges of sustainable development, tools like IMPACT pathways will be crucial for guiding evidence-based decision-making.