The Impact of School and Family Networks on COVID-19 Infections Among Dutch Students: A Study Using Population-Level Registry Data
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Extensive registry data on PCR test results and population-level networks used to investigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Netherlands
- Compared transmission probabilities across different social contexts like schools, families, and geographic proximity
- Found household and family transmission was more important than school settings in SARS-CoV-2 spread
- Used multilevel regression to examine how individual, school, and geographic factors contribute to transmission risk
Plain English Explanation
Understanding how different social interactions affect the spread of diseases like COVID-19 is crucial for improving epidemic models. This study used comprehensive registry data, including COVID-19 test results and information about people's social networks, to investigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Netherlands from June 2020 to October 2021.
The researchers focused on comparing the likelihood of transmission in different settings, such as schools, families, and geographic areas. They matched pairs of students based on factors like whether they attended the same or different primary and secondary schools, and whether they lived near each other. They then calculated the probability of both students testing positive for COVID-19 within a 14-day period.
The results highlight the important role of household and family transmission in the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The probability of infections occurring within the same household, either between siblings or between parents and children, was much higher (around 22-23%) than the probability of infections occurring between people living in different households but attending the same school (around 1.65%). In contrast, the probability of infections between people living near each other but not attending the same school was only around 0.5%.
The researchers also used statistical analysis to examine how individual, school, and geographic factors contributed to the risk of transmission. They found that the majority of the differences in transmission probabilities (around 60%) were due to unknown individual-level factors, while school-level factors (like size, denomination, or surrounding neighborhood income) accounted for around 34% of the differences. Only a small proportion (3%) could be attributed to the geographic proximity of students or the size and characteristics of their schools.
Technical Explanation
This study used extensive registry data, including PCR test results and population-level social network information, to investigate the impact of different social contexts on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Netherlands from June 2020 to October 2021.
The researchers isolated and compared the probabilities of transmission in different settings by matching pairs of students based on their attendance at the same or different primary (in 2020) and secondary (in 2021) schools, as well as their geographic proximity. They then calculated the probability of temporally associated infections - i.e., the likelihood of both students testing positive within a 14-day period.
The results highlight the relatively greater importance of household and family transmission compared to school settings. The probability of temporally associated infections was 22.6-23.2% for siblings and parent-child pairs living in the same household, and 4.7-7.9% for family members living in different households. In contrast, the probability was only 0.52% for pairs of students living nearby but not attending the same schools, 0.66% for pairs attending different secondary schools but the same primary school, and 1.65% for pairs attending the same secondary school.
The researchers also conducted multilevel regression analyses to examine the contribution of individual, school, and geographic factors to transmission risk. They found that the largest differences in transmission probabilities were due to unobserved individual (60%) and school-level (34%) factors, while only a small proportion (3%) could be attributed to the geographic proximity of students or to school size, denomination, or the median income of the school area.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the relative importance of different social contexts in driving SARS-CoV-2 transmission. By isolating the probabilities of transmission in various settings, the researchers were able to highlight the outsized role of household and family contacts compared to school-based interactions.
However, the study does acknowledge some limitations. The use of registry data means that certain individual-level factors that could influence transmission risk, such as behaviors and social practices, were not directly observed. The researchers also note that the study period covered a time when school closures and other non-pharmaceutical interventions were in place, which may have affected the observed transmission patterns.
Additionally, while the multilevel regression analysis provided insights into the relative contributions of individual, school, and geographic factors, the study did not delve deeper into the specific mechanisms underlying these differences. Further research may be needed to understand the causal pathways and underlying social dynamics that drive transmission in different contexts.
It would also be interesting to see how these findings may vary across different cultural and socioeconomic settings, as well as how they evolve over time as the pandemic and societal responses continue to unfold. Nonetheless, this study represents an important step in quantifying the hierarchical scales of scientists' mobility and understanding the impact of social interactions on epidemic dynamics.
Conclusion
This study used extensive registry data to investigate the impact of different social contexts on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Netherlands. The key finding was that household and family transmission played a much more significant role in the spread of the virus compared to school-based interactions. The researchers also found that individual and school-level factors were the primary drivers of transmission risk, with geographic proximity and school characteristics contributing only a small proportion.
These insights underscore the importance of considering the nuanced social dynamics underlying epidemic spread, beyond just broad-based interventions. As we continue to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future disease outbreaks, understanding the role of non-coresident family as a driver of migration change and the perceived influence of others on individual behavior will be crucial for developing more targeted and effective public health strategies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
The Impact of School and Family Networks on COVID-19 Infections Among Dutch Students: A Study Using Population-Level Registry Data
Javier Garcia-Bernardo, Christine Hedde-von Westernhagen, Tom Emery, Albert Jan van Hoek
Understanding the impact of different social interactions is key to improving epidemic models. Here, we use extensive registry data -- including PCR test results and population-level networks -- to investigate the impact of school, family, and other social contacts on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Netherlands (June 2020--October 2021). We isolate and compare different contexts of potential SARS-CoV-2 transmission by matching pairs of students based on their attendance at the same or different primary school (in 2020) and secondary school (in 2021) and their geographic proximity. We then calculated the probability of temporally associated infections -- i.e. the probability of both students testing positive within a 14-day period. Our results highlight the relative importance of household and family transmission in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 compared to school settings. The probability of temporally associated infections for siblings and parent-child pairs living in the same household was 22.6--23.2%, and 4.7--7.9% for family members living in different household. In contrast, the probability of temporally associated infections was 0.52% for pairs of students living nearby but not attending the same primary or secondary school, 0.66% for pairs attending different secondary schools but having attended the same primary school, and 1.65% for pairs attending the same secondary school. Finally, we used multilevel regression analyses to examine how individual, school, and geographic factors contribute to transmission risk. We found that the largest differences in transmission probabilities were due to unobserved individual (60%) and school-level (34%) factors. Only a small proportion (3%) could be attributed to geographic proximity of students or to school size, denomination, or the median income of the school area.
Read more7/22/2024
🤯
0
Non-coresident family as a driver of migration change in a crisis: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic
Unchitta Kan, Jericho McLeod, Eduardo L'opez
Changes in U.S. migration during the COVID-19 pandemic show that many moved to less populated cities from larger cities, deviating from previous trends. In this study, building on prior work in the literature showing that the abundance of family ties is inversely related to population size, we analyze these migration changes with a focus on the crucial, yet overlooked factor of extended family. Employing two large-scale data sets, census microdata and mobile phone GPS relocation data, we show a collection of empirical results that paints a picture of migration change affected by kin. Namely, we find that people migrated closer to family at higher rates after the COVID-19 pandemic started. Moreover, even controlling for factors such as population density and cost of living, we find that changes in net in-migration tended to be larger and positive in cities with larger proportions of people who can be parents to adult children (our proxy for parental family availability, which is also inversely related to population size). Our study advances the demography-disaster nexus and amplifies ongoing literature highlighting the role of broader kinship systems in large-scale socioeconomic phenomena.
Read more4/4/2024
📊
0
Generating geographically and economically realistic large-scale synthetic contact networks: A general method using publicly available data
Alexander Y. Tulchinsky, Fardad Haghpanah, Alisa Hamilton, Nodar Kipshidze, Eili Y. Klein
Synthetic contact networks are useful for modeling epidemic spread and social transmission, but data to infer realistic contact patterns that take account of assortative connections at the geographic and economic levels is limited. We developed a method to generate synthetic contact networks for any region of the United States based on publicly available data. First, we generate a synthetic population of individuals within households from US census data using combinatorial optimization. Then, individuals are assigned to workplaces and schools using commute data, employment statistics, and school enrollment data. The resulting population is then connected into a realistic contact network using graph generation algorithms. We test the method on two census regions and show that the synthetic populations accurately reflect the source data. We further show that the contact networks have distinct properties compared to networks generated without a synthetic population, and that those differences affect the rate of disease transmission in an epidemiological simulation. We provide open-source software to generate a synthetic population and contact network for any area within the US.
Read more6/24/2024
🔄
0
Effectiveness of probabilistic contact tracing in epidemic containment: the role of super-spreaders and transmission path reconstruction
A. P. Muntoni, F. Mazza, A. Braunstein, G. Catania, L. Dall'Asta
The recent COVID-19 pandemic underscores the significance of early-stage non-pharmacological intervention strategies. The widespread use of masks and the systematic implementation of contact tracing strategies provide a potentially equally effective and socially less impactful alternative to more conventional approaches, such as large-scale mobility restrictions. However, manual contact tracing faces strong limitations in accessing the network of contacts, and the scalability of currently implemented protocols for smartphone-based digital contact tracing becomes impractical during the rapid expansion phases of the outbreaks, due to the surge in exposure notifications and associated tests. A substantial improvement in digital contact tracing can be obtained through the integration of probabilistic techniques for risk assessment that can more effectively guide the allocation of new diagnostic tests. In this study, we first quantitatively analyze the diagnostic and social costs associated with these containment measures based on contact tracing, employing three state-of-the-art models of SARS-CoV-2 spreading. Our results suggest that probabilistic techniques allow for more effective mitigation at a lower cost. Secondly, our findings reveal a remarkable efficacy of probabilistic contact-tracing techniques in performing backward and multi-step tracing and capturing super-spreading events.
Read more9/2/2024