Impact of Social Relationships on Peer Assessment in E-Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the impact of social relationships on peer assessment in e-learning environments
- Investigates how social connections between students influence their assessment of each other's work
- Highlights the importance of understanding social dynamics in online learning contexts
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how the social relationships between students in an e-learning setting can impact the way they assess each other's work. When students know each other and have existing social connections, it can influence the grades and feedback they provide during peer assessment activities.
This research suggests that social factors play a significant role in shaping the peer assessment process. For example, students may be more lenient or generous in their assessments of friends, or they may be harsher on those they are not close with. Understanding these social dynamics is crucial for designing effective online learning environments that promote fair and unbiased peer evaluation.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a study that investigates the impact of social relationships on peer assessment in e-learning. The researchers collected data from an online course where students were required to provide peer feedback on each other's assignments. They analyzed the relationship between the social connections (e.g., friendship, acquaintanceship) among students and the grades they assigned during the peer assessment process.
The findings indicate that social relationships do influence peer assessment, with students tending to give higher grades to those they are socially connected with. The researchers also explored factors such as the strength of the social tie, the direction of the relationship (e.g., a student assessing a friend vs. a non-friend), and the impact on the overall assessment distribution.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the role of social relationships in peer assessment, which is an important consideration for the design of effective e-learning systems. However, the study is limited to a single online course, and the findings may not be generalizable to all e-learning contexts.
Additional research could explore the impact of social relationships on peer assessment across different subject areas, course formats, and student demographics to better understand the broader implications of these findings.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into potential strategies for mitigating the influence of social relationships on peer assessment, such as the use of anonymity or the introduction of specific assessment guidelines. Exploring these solutions could help create more equitable and unbiased peer evaluation processes in e-learning environments.
Conclusion
This research highlights the significant impact of social relationships on peer assessment in e-learning settings. By understanding these social dynamics, educators and researchers can work to design online learning environments that promote fair and unbiased peer evaluation, ultimately enhancing the overall learning experience for students.
The insights from this study have important implications for the development of educational technologies and the implementation of peer assessment strategies in e-learning, as well as for broader discussions around the role of social factors in online learning and collaboration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Impact of Social Relationships on Peer Assessment in E-Learning
Francisco Sousa, Tom'as Alves, Sandra Gama, Joaquim Jorge, Daniel Gonc{c}alves
Peer assessment has been widely studied as a replacement for traditional evaluation, not only by reducing the professors' workload but mainly by benefiting students' engagement and learning. Although several works successfully validate its accuracy and fairness, more research must be done on how students' pre-existing social relationships affect the grades they give their peers in an e-learning course. We developed a Moodle plugin to provide the platform with peer assessment capabilities in forums and used it on an MSc course. The plugin curated the reviewer set for a post based on the author's relationships and included rubrics to counter the possible interpersonal effects of peer assessment. Results confirm that peer assessment is reliable and accurate for works with at least three peer assessments, although students' grades are slightly higher. The impact of social relationships is noticeable when students who do not like another peer grade their work consistently lower than students who have a positive connection. However, this has little influence on the final aggregate peer grade. Our findings show that peer assessment can replace traditional evaluation in an e-learning environment where students are familiar with each other.
Read more7/2/2024
💬
0
Use of social networks to motivate computer-engineering students to participate in self-assessment activities
Carlos Guerrero, Antoni Jaume-i-Cap'o
Motivation is essential in the learning process of university students, and teachers should have a wide range of strategies to address this issue. The emergence of social technologies has had a considerable influence in e-learning systems, and a number of experts state that their use is a good method to motivate students and to increase their participation in activities. This study attempts to determine whether social networks and social applications should be viewed as many other tools or whether they can actually provide extra motivation for students to participate. The study compared the percentage of student participation in tasks of self-assessment. The experiments covered three traditional strategies of student motivation and another one in which social networks were used to introduce, explain and deliver the self-assessment tasks. The case with a higher participation was the one in which students obtained a reward from the completion of the activity. Despite this result, the statistical analysis indicated that the use of social networks obtained similar results as a strategy of continuous and regular motivational speeches.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Learning Outcomes, Assessment, and Evaluation in Educational Recommender Systems: A Systematic Review
Nursultan Askarbekuly, Ivan Lukovi'c
In this paper, we analyse how learning is measured and optimized in Educational Recommender Systems (ERS). In particular, we examine the target metrics and evaluation methods used in the existing ERS research, with a particular focus on the pedagogical effect of recommendations. While conducting this systematic literature review (SLR), we identified 1395 potentially relevant papers, then filtered them through the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally selected and analyzed 28 relevant papers. Rating-based relevance is the most popular target metric, while less than a half of papers optimize learning-based metrics. Only a third of the papers used outcome-based assessment to measure the pedagogical effect of recommendations, mostly within a formal university course. This indicates a gap in ERS research with respect to assessing the pedagogical effect of recommendations at scale and in informal education settings.
Read more7/16/2024
0
The Impact of Group Discussion and Formation on Student Performance: An Experience Report in a Large CS1 Course
Tong Wu, Xiaohang Tang, Sam Wong, Xi Chen, Clifford A. Shaffer, Yan Chen
Programming instructors often conduct collaborative learning activities, such as Peer Instruction (PI), to enhance student motivation, engagement, and learning gains. However, the impact of group discussion and formation mechanisms on student performance remains unclear. To investigate this, we conducted an 11-session experiment in a large, in-person CS1 course. We employed both random and expertise-balanced grouping methods to examine the efficacy of different group mechanisms and the impact of expert students' presence on collaborative learning. Our observations revealed complex dynamics within the collaborative learning environment. Among 255 groups, 146 actively engaged in discussions, with 96 of these groups demonstrating improvement for poor-performing students. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that different grouping methods (expertise-balanced or random) did not significantly influence discussion engagement or poor-performing students' improvement. In our deeper qualitative analysis, we found that struggling students often derived benefits from interactions with expert peers, but this positive effect was not consistent across all groups. We identified challenges that expert students face in peer instruction interactions, highlighting the complexity of leveraging expertise within group discussions.
Read more8/28/2024