Incorporating Recklessness to Collaborative Filtering based Recommender Systems
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recommender systems face a dilemma between making reliable predictions and providing novel recommendations
- Reliable predictions tend to be conservative, leading to fewer unusual or surprising item recommendations
- This paper proposes a new approach to address this dilemma
Plain English Explanation
Recommender systems are tools that suggest products, services, or information that users might like based on their past preferences and the preferences of similar users. However, these systems often struggle with a tradeoff. On one hand, they can make very reliable predictions about what users will enjoy, but these reliable predictions tend to be for safe, mainstream options that the user has likely already encountered. On the other hand, they can recommend more unusual or surprising items, but these riskier predictions are less likely to be accurate.
This paper introduces a new concept called "recklessness" that aims to help recommender systems strike a better balance. The idea is to give the system a bit more "recklessness" or willingness to take a chance on less certain predictions. This allows the system to recommend a wider range of items, including more novel and unusual options, while still maintaining a reasonable level of reliability. By adjusting the degree of "recklessness," the system can be tuned to the user's preference for novelty versus reliability.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of a "recklessness" term in the learning process of matrix factorization-based recommender systems. Matrix factorization is a common technique used to build recommender systems by identifying latent factors that determine user preferences and item characteristics.
Typically, recommender systems aim to minimize the error between predicted and actual user ratings. This leads to conservative, reliable predictions. The new "recklessness" term instead encourages the system to consider the variance, or spread, of the predicted rating distribution. By optimizing for a spikier, more uneven distribution of predicted ratings, the system is incentivized to make some riskier, less certain predictions in addition to the safe, reliable ones.
The authors show through experiments that this recklessness approach allows for better control over the risk-novelty tradeoff. It improves both the quantity and quality of recommendations, generating more novel items without sacrificing too much reliability.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful solution to an important challenge in recommender systems. Allowing the system to be "reckless" in a controlled way is an elegant way to encourage more novel recommendations without abandoning reliability entirely.
However, the concept of "recklessness" is somewhat nebulous and could benefit from further clarification and formalization. It's not entirely clear how this term is quantified and balanced against other objectives in the optimization process.
Additionally, the experiments are limited to a single dataset and matrix factorization model. Further testing on a broader range of recommender system architectures and real-world deployment scenarios would help validate the generalizability of the findings.
Finally, the paper does not deeply explore potential downsides or unintended consequences of the recklessness approach. For example, highly "reckless" recommendations could frustrate users if they are too far out of their typical preferences. Careful monitoring and user studies would be important to ensure the recklessness is calibrated appropriately.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel concept of "recklessness" to help recommender systems strike a better balance between reliable and novel recommendations. By incorporating this recklessness factor into the learning process, the system can be tuned to provide a more diverse range of suggestions without sacrificing too much accuracy.
While further research is needed to fully understand the implications and generalizability of this approach, it represents an important step forward in addressing a fundamental challenge in recommender systems. Empowering these systems to be more "reckless" in a controlled way could lead to discoveries and serendipitous experiences that users find delightful and engaging.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
Incorporating Recklessness to Collaborative Filtering based Recommender Systems
Diego P'erez-L'opez, Fernando Ortega, 'Angel Gonz'alez-Prieto, Jorge Due~nas-Ler'in
Recommender systems are intrinsically tied to a reliability/coverage dilemma: The more reliable we desire the forecasts, the more conservative the decision will be and thus, the fewer items will be recommended. This causes a detriment to the predictive capability of the system, as it is only able to estimate potential interest in items for which there is a consensus in their evaluation, rather than being able to estimate potential interest in any item. In this paper, we propose the inclusion of a new term in the learning process of matrix factorization-based recommender systems, called recklessness, that takes into account the variance of the output probability distribution of the predicted ratings. In this way, gauging this recklessness measure we can force more spiky output distribution, enabling the control of the risk level desired when making decisions about the reliability of a prediction. Experimental results demonstrate that recklessness not only allows for risk regulation but also improves the quantity and quality of predictions provided by the recommender system.
Read more5/22/2024
0
Transparency, Privacy, and Fairness in Recommender Systems
Dominik Kowald
Recommender systems have become a pervasive part of our daily online experience, and are one of the most widely used applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Therefore, regulations and requirements for trustworthy artificial intelligence, for example, the European AI Act, which includes notions such as transparency, privacy, and fairness are also highly relevant for the design of recommender systems in practice. This habilitation elaborates on aspects related to these three notions in the light of recommender systems, namely: (i) transparency and cognitive models, (ii) privacy and limited preference information, and (iii) fairness and popularity bias in recommender systems. Specifically, with respect to aspect (i), we highlight the usefulness of incorporating psychological theories for a transparent design process of recommender systems. We term this type of systems psychology-informed recommender systems. In aspect (ii), we study and address the trade-off between accuracy and privacy in differentially-private recommendations. We design a novel recommendation approach for collaborative filtering based on an efficient neighborhood reuse concept, which reduces the number of users that need to be protected with differential privacy. Furthermore, we address the related issue of limited availability of user preference information, e.g., click data, in the settings of session-based and cold-start recommendations. With respect to aspect (iii), we analyze popularity bias in recommender systems. We find that the recommendation frequency of an item is positively correlated with this item's popularity. This also leads to the unfair treatment of users with little interest in popular content. Finally, we study long-term fairness dynamics in algorithmic decision support in the labor market using agent-based modeling techniques.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Deep Uncertainty-based explore For Index Construction and Retrieval in Recommendation System
Xin Jiang, Kaiqiang Wang, Yinlong Wang, Fengchang Lv, Taiyang Peng, Shuai Yang, Xianteng Wu, Pengye Zhang, Shuo Yuan, Yifan Zeng
In recommendation systems, the relevance and novelty of the final results are selected through a cascade system of Matching -> Ranking -> Strategy. The matching model serves as the starting point of the pipeline and determines the upper bound of the subsequent stages. Balancing the relevance and novelty of matching results is a crucial step in the design and optimization of recommendation systems, contributing significantly to improving recommendation quality. However, the typical matching algorithms have not simultaneously addressed the relevance and novelty perfectly. One main reason is that deep matching algorithms exhibit significant uncertainty when estimating items in the long tail (e.g., due to insufficient training samples) items.The uncertainty not only affects the training of the models but also influences the confidence in the index construction and beam search retrieval process of these models. This paper proposes the UICR (Uncertainty-based explore for Index Construction and Retrieval) algorithm, which introduces the concept of uncertainty modeling in the matching stage and achieves multi-task modeling of model uncertainty and index uncertainty. The final matching results are obtained by combining the relevance score and uncertainty score infered by the model. Experimental results demonstrate that the UICR improves novelty without sacrificing relevance on realworld industrial productive environments and multiple open-source datasets. Remarkably, online A/B test results of display advertising in Shopee demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Robust portfolio optimization for recommender systems considering uncertainty of estimated statistics
Tomoya Yanagi, Shunnosuke Ikeda, Yuichi Takano
This paper is concerned with portfolio optimization models for creating high-quality lists of recommended items to balance the accuracy and diversity of recommendations. However, the statistics (i.e., expectation and covariance of ratings) required for mean--variance portfolio optimization are subject to inevitable estimation errors. To remedy this situation, we focus on robust optimization techniques that derive reliable solutions to uncertain optimization problems. Specifically, we propose a robust portfolio optimization model that copes with the uncertainty of estimated statistics based on the cardinality-based uncertainty sets. This robust portfolio optimization model can be reduced to a mixed-integer linear optimization problem, which can be solved exactly using mathematical optimization solvers. Experimental results using two publicly available rating datasets demonstrate that our method can improve not only the recommendation accuracy but also the diversity of recommendations compared with conventional mean--variance portfolio optimization models. Notably, our method has the potential to improve the recommendation quality of various rating prediction algorithms.
Read more6/18/2024