Increasing Efficiency and Result Reliability of Continuous Benchmarking for FaaS Applications
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper focuses on improving the efficiency and reliability of continuous benchmarking for Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) applications.
- FaaS is a serverless computing model where developers deploy individual functions that can be triggered by events or API calls, rather than managing entire applications.
- Continuous benchmarking is the practice of regularly evaluating the performance of FaaS applications to identify issues and optimize their deployment.
- The authors propose several techniques to make continuous benchmarking more efficient and accurate, including workload scheduling, resource isolation, and statistical analysis.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses ways to make it easier and more accurate to continuously test the performance of serverless applications. Serverless computing, also called Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), allows developers to deploy individual functions that get triggered by events or API calls, instead of managing full applications. Continuously benchmarking these serverless applications is important to identify problems and optimize them, but it can be challenging.
The researchers suggest several techniques to improve continuous benchmarking of serverless apps. For example, they propose better scheduling of the workloads used for testing to make the process more efficient. They also describe ways to isolate the resources used during testing to get more reliable results. Additionally, the paper mentions using advanced statistical analysis to extract meaningful insights from the benchmark data.
By implementing these improvements, the authors aim to make it easier and more trustworthy for developers to regularly test the performance of their serverless applications. This can help them quickly identify and fix any issues, leading to better-performing and more reliable serverless services.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several techniques to increase the efficiency and reliability of continuous benchmarking for FaaS applications:
-
Workload Scheduling: The authors suggest an improved workload scheduling approach that accounts for the bursty and event-driven nature of FaaS workloads. This helps optimize resource utilization and reduce the time required for benchmarking.
-
Resource Isolation: To improve result reliability, the paper describes methods for isolating the resources (e.g., CPU, memory, network) used during benchmarking. This mitigates the impact of noisy neighbors and other external factors.
-
Statistical Analysis: Advanced statistical techniques, such as time series analysis and anomaly detection, are proposed to extract meaningful insights from the benchmark data. This allows for more robust interpretation of the results.
The authors evaluate their techniques using two popular FaaS platforms, AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions. They demonstrate significant improvements in benchmarking efficiency and result reliability compared to traditional approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive set of techniques to address the challenges of continuous benchmarking for FaaS applications. The authors' focus on workload scheduling, resource isolation, and statistical analysis is well-justified and aligned with the key pain points in this domain.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations of these techniques. For example, the resource isolation methods may not be effective in highly-constrained environments, such as edge-based FaaS platforms or vertically-scaled FaaS applications. Additionally, the overhead and complexity introduced by the proposed techniques could be a concern, especially for smaller-scale FaaS deployments.
It would be valuable for the authors to discuss these potential caveats and suggest strategies for addressing them. Further research could also explore the applicability of these techniques in emerging FaaS architectures and deployment scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive set of techniques to improve the efficiency and reliability of continuous benchmarking for FaaS applications. By addressing the unique challenges of workload scheduling, resource isolation, and data analysis, the authors demonstrate significant enhancements to the benchmarking process.
The proposed methods can help developers and operators better understand the performance characteristics of their serverless applications, leading to improved optimization, troubleshooting, and overall service quality. As the adoption of FaaS continues to grow, the insights from this research can contribute to the development of more robust and efficient serverless computing platforms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Increasing Efficiency and Result Reliability of Continuous Benchmarking for FaaS Applications
Tim C. Rese, Nils Japke, Sebastian Koch, Tobias Pfandzelter, David Bermbach
In a continuous deployment setting, Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) applications frequently receive updated releases, each of which can cause a performance regression. While continuous benchmarking, i.e., comparing benchmark results of the updated and the previous version, can detect such regressions, performance variability of FaaS platforms necessitates thousands of function calls, thus, making continuous benchmarking time-intensive and expensive. In this paper, we propose DuetFaaS, an approach which adapts duet benchmarking to FaaS applications. With DuetFaaS, we deploy two versions of FaaS function in a single cloud function instance and execute them in parallel to reduce the impact of platform variability. We evaluate our approach against state-of-the-art approaches, running on AWS Lambda. Overall, DuetFaaS requires fewer invocations to accurately detect performance regressions than other state-of-the-art approaches. In 98.41% of evaluated cases, our approach provides equal or smaller confidence interval size. DuetFaaS achieves an interval size reduction in 59.06% of all evaluated sample sizes when compared to the competitive approaches.
Read more8/20/2024
🤷
0
Application-Centric Benchmarking of Distributed FaaS Platforms using BeFaaS
Martin Grambow, Tobias Pfandzelter, David Bermbach
Due to the popularity of the FaaS programming model, there is now a wide variety of commercial and open-source FaaS systems. Hence, for comparison of different FaaS systems and their configuration options, FaaS application developers rely on FaaS benchmarking frameworks. Existing frameworks, however, tend to evaluate only single isolated aspects, a more holistic application-centric benchmarking framework is still missing. In previous work, we proposed BeFaaS, an extensible application-centric benchmarking framework for FaaS environments that focuses on the evaluation of FaaS platforms through realistic and typical examples of FaaS applications. In this extended paper, we (i) enhance our benchmarking framework with additional features for distributed FaaS setups, (ii) design application benchmarks reflecting typical FaaS use cases, and (iii) use them to run extensive experiments with commercial cloud FaaS platforms (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions) and the tinyFaaS edge serverless platform. BeFaaS now includes four FaaS application-centric benchmarks, is extensible for additional workload profiles and platforms, and supports federated benchmark runs in which the benchmark application is distributed over multiple FaaS systems while collecting fine-grained measurement results for drill-down analysis. Our experiment results show that (i) network transmission is a major contributor to response latency for function chains, (ii) this effect is exacerbated in hybrid edge-cloud deployments, (iii) the trigger delay between a published event and the start of the triggered function ranges from about 100ms for AWS Lambda to 800ms for Google Cloud Functions, and (iv) Azure Functions shows the best cold start behavior for our workloads.
Read more4/29/2024
🏋️
0
ElastiBench: Scalable Continuous Benchmarking on Cloud FaaS Platforms
Trever Schirmer, Tobias Pfandzelter, David Bermbach
Running microbenchmark suites often and early in the development process enables developers to identify performance issues in their application. Microbenchmark suites of complex applications can comprise hundreds of individual benchmarks and take multiple hours to evaluate meaningfully, making running those benchmarks as part of CI/CD pipelines infeasible. In this paper, we reduce the total execution time of microbenchmark suites by leveraging the massive scalability and elasticity of FaaS (Function-as-a-Service) platforms. While using FaaS enables users to quickly scale up to thousands of parallel function instances to speed up microbenchmarking, the performance variation and low control over the underlying computing resources complicate reliable benchmarking. We demonstrate an architecture for executing microbenchmark suites on cloud FaaS platforms and evaluate it on code changes from an open-source time series database. Our evaluation shows that our prototype can produce reliable results (~95% of performance changes accurately detected) in a quarter of the time (<=15min vs.~4h) and at lower cost ($0.49 vs. ~$1.18) compared to cloud-based virtual machines.
Read more7/30/2024
0
FaaS Is Not Enough: Serverless Handling of Burst-Parallel Jobs
Daniel Barcelona-Pons, Aitor Arjona, Pedro Garc'ia-L'opez, Enrique Molina-Gim'enez, Stepan Klymonchuk
Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) struggles with burst-parallel jobs due to needing multiple independent invocations to start a job. The lack of a group invocation primitive complicates application development and overlooks crucial aspects like locality and worker communication. We introduce a new serverless solution designed specifically for burst-parallel jobs. Unlike FaaS, our solution ensures job-level isolation using a group invocation primitive, allowing large groups of workers to be launched simultaneously. This method optimizes resource allocation by consolidating workers into fewer containers, speeding up their initialization and enhancing locality. Enhanced locality drastically reduces remote communication compared to FaaS, and combined with simultaneity, it enables workers to communicate synchronously via message passing and group collectives. This makes applications that are impractical with FaaS feasible. We implemented our solution on OpenWhisk, providing a communication middleware that efficiently uses locality with zero-copy messaging. Evaluations show that it reduces job invocation and communication latency, resulting in a 2$times$ speed-up for TeraSort and a 98.5% reduction in remote communication for PageRank (13$times$ speed-up) compared to traditional FaaS.
Read more7/22/2024