An Information Theoretic Metric for Evaluating Unlearning Models
2405.17878
0
0
🔎
Abstract
Machine unlearning (MU) addresses privacy concerns by removing information of `forgetting data' samples from trained models. Typically, evaluating MU methods involves comparing unlearned models to those retrained from scratch without forgetting data, using metrics such as membership inference attacks (MIA) and accuracy measurements. These evaluations implicitly assume that if the output logits of the unlearned and retrained models are similar, the unlearned model has successfully forgotten the data. Here, we challenge if this assumption is valid. In particular, we conduct a simple experiment of training only the last layer of a given original model using a novel masked-distillation technique while keeping the rest fixed. Surprisingly, simply altering the last layer yields favorable outcomes in the existing evaluation metrics, while the model does not successfully unlearn the samples or classes. For better evaluating the MU methods, we propose a metric that quantifies the residual information about forgetting data samples in intermediate features using mutual information, called information difference index or IDI for short. The IDI provides a comprehensive evaluation of MU methods by efficiently analyzing the internal structure of DNNs. Our metric is scalable to large datasets and adaptable to various model architectures. Additionally, we present COLapse-and-Align (COLA), a simple contrastive-based method that effectively unlearns intermediate features.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses a technique called Machine Unlearning (MU) that aims to remove information about "forgetting data" samples from trained models to address privacy concerns.
- Existing evaluations of MU methods compare unlearned models to those retrained from scratch, using metrics like membership inference attacks (MIA) and accuracy measurements.
- The paper challenges the assumption that if the output logits of the unlearned and retrained models are similar, the unlearned model has successfully forgotten the data.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines a technique called Machine Unlearning (MU) that is intended to remove information about specific data samples from trained machine learning models. This is important for addressing privacy concerns, as it allows models to "forget" certain data that users may want removed.
Typically, researchers evaluate MU methods by comparing unlearned models to models that were retrained from scratch without the "forgetting data" samples. They use metrics like membership inference attacks (MIA) and accuracy measurements to see how similar the outputs of the unlearned and retrained models are. The assumption is that if the outputs are similar, the unlearned model has successfully forgotten the data.
However, the paper challenges this assumption. The researchers conduct a simple experiment where they only train the last layer of an original model using a novel "masked-distillation" technique, while keeping the rest of the model fixed. Surprisingly, this simple change to the last layer yields favorable outcomes in the existing evaluation metrics, even though the model has not actually unlearned the "forgetting data" samples or classes.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new metric, called the Information Difference Index (IDI), to better evaluate MU methods. The IDI quantifies the residual information about the "forgetting data" samples in the intermediate features of the model, using mutual information. This provides a more comprehensive evaluation of MU methods by analyzing the internal structure of deep neural networks (DNNs).
The IDI is scalable to large datasets and adaptable to various model architectures. Additionally, the paper presents a simple contrastive-based method called COLapse-and-Align (COLA) that effectively unlearns intermediate features.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the existing evaluation methods for MU, which may not accurately reflect whether a model has truly forgotten the "forgetting data" samples. The masked-distillation experiment highlights how a simple change to the last layer can yield favorable results in the current metrics, even though the model has not successfully unlearned the data.
The proposed IDI metric provides a more comprehensive evaluation by examining the model's internal structure, rather than just looking at the output logits. This approach seems promising, as it could help identify cases where a model appears to have "forgotten" the data based on the output, but still retains relevant information in its intermediate features.
However, the paper does not extensively evaluate the IDI metric or the COLA method on a wide range of models and datasets. Additional research would be needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and practical applications of these techniques.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the assumptions underlying the current evaluation methods for Machine Unlearning and proposes a new metric, the Information Difference Index (IDI), to better assess whether a model has truly forgotten the "forgetting data" samples. The IDI's focus on analyzing the model's internal structure could lead to more robust and meaningful evaluations of MU methods.
The paper also introduces a simple contrastive-based technique called COLA that effectively unlearns intermediate features. Further research is needed to fully validate the IDI metric and the COLA method, but this work represents an important step in improving the evaluation and effectiveness of machine unlearning for preserving user privacy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Reliable Empirical Machine Unlearning Evaluation: A Game-Theoretic View
Yiwen Tu, Pingbang Hu, Jiaqi Ma
0
0
Machine unlearning is the process of updating machine learning models to remove the information of specific training data samples, in order to comply with data protection regulations that allow individuals to request the removal of their personal data. Despite the recent development of numerous unlearning algorithms, reliable evaluation of these algorithms remains an open research question. In this work, we focus on membership inference attack (MIA) based evaluation, one of the most common approaches for evaluating unlearning algorithms, and address various pitfalls of existing evaluation metrics that lack reliability. Specifically, we propose a game-theoretic framework that formalizes the evaluation process as a game between unlearning algorithms and MIA adversaries, measuring the data removal efficacy of unlearning algorithms by the capability of the MIA adversaries. Through careful design of the game, we demonstrate that the natural evaluation metric induced from the game enjoys provable guarantees that the existing evaluation metrics fail to satisfy. Furthermore, we propose a practical and efficient algorithm to estimate the evaluation metric induced from the game, and demonstrate its effectiveness through both theoretical analysis and empirical experiments. This work presents a novel and reliable approach to empirically evaluating unlearning algorithms, paving the way for the development of more effective unlearning techniques.
6/13/2024
🖼️
Single Image Unlearning: Efficient Machine Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models
Jiaqi Li, Qianshan Wei, Chuanyi Zhang, Guilin Qi, Miaozeng Du, Yongrui Chen, Sheng Bi
0
0
Machine unlearning empowers individuals with the `right to be forgotten' by removing their private or sensitive information encoded in machine learning models. However, it remains uncertain whether MU can be effectively applied to Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), particularly in scenarios of forgetting the leaked visual data of concepts. To overcome the challenge, we propose an efficient method, Single Image Unlearning (SIU), to unlearn the visual recognition of a concept by fine-tuning a single associated image for few steps. SIU consists of two key aspects: (i) Constructing Multifaceted fine-tuning data. We introduce four targets, based on which we construct fine-tuning data for the concepts to be forgotten; (ii) Jointly training loss. To synchronously forget the visual recognition of concepts and preserve the utility of MLLMs, we fine-tune MLLMs through a novel Dual Masked KL-divergence Loss combined with Cross Entropy loss. Alongside our method, we establish MMUBench, a new benchmark for MU in MLLMs and introduce a collection of metrics for its evaluation. Experimental results on MMUBench show that SIU completely surpasses the performance of existing methods. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that SIU can avoid invasive membership inference attacks and jailbreak attacks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to explore MU in MLLMs. We will release the code and benchmark in the near future.
5/30/2024
Inexact Unlearning Needs More Careful Evaluations to Avoid a False Sense of Privacy
Jamie Hayes, Ilia Shumailov, Eleni Triantafillou, Amr Khalifa, Nicolas Papernot
0
0
The high cost of model training makes it increasingly desirable to develop techniques for unlearning. These techniques seek to remove the influence of a training example without having to retrain the model from scratch. Intuitively, once a model has unlearned, an adversary that interacts with the model should no longer be able to tell whether the unlearned example was included in the model's training set or not. In the privacy literature, this is known as membership inference. In this work, we discuss adaptations of Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) to the setting of unlearning (leading to their U-MIA counterparts). We propose a categorization of existing U-MIAs into population U-MIAs, where the same attacker is instantiated for all examples, and per-example U-MIAs, where a dedicated attacker is instantiated for each example. We show that the latter category, wherein the attacker tailors its membership prediction to each example under attack, is significantly stronger. Indeed, our results show that the commonly used U-MIAs in the unlearning literature overestimate the privacy protection afforded by existing unlearning techniques on both vision and language models. Our investigation reveals a large variance in the vulnerability of different examples to per-example U-MIAs. In fact, several unlearning algorithms lead to a reduced vulnerability for some, but not all, examples that we wish to unlearn, at the expense of increasing it for other examples. Notably, we find that the privacy protection for the remaining training examples may worsen as a consequence of unlearning. We also discuss the fundamental difficulty of equally protecting all examples using existing unlearning schemes, due to the different rates at which examples are unlearned. We demonstrate that naive attempts at tailoring unlearning stopping criteria to different examples fail to alleviate these issues.
5/22/2024
🌿
An Information Theoretic Approach to Machine Unlearning
Jack Foster, Kyle Fogarty, Stefan Schoepf, Cengiz Oztireli, Alexandra Brintrup
0
0
To comply with AI and data regulations, the need to forget private or copyrighted information from trained machine learning models is increasingly important. The key challenge in unlearning is forgetting the necessary data in a timely manner, while preserving model performance. In this work, we address the zero-shot unlearning scenario, whereby an unlearning algorithm must be able to remove data given only a trained model and the data to be forgotten. We explore unlearning from an information theoretic perspective, connecting the influence of a sample to the information gain a model receives by observing it. From this, we derive a simple but principled zero-shot unlearning method based on the geometry of the model. Our approach takes the form of minimising the gradient of a learned function with respect to a small neighbourhood around a target forget point. This induces a smoothing effect, causing forgetting by moving the boundary of the classifier. We explore the intuition behind why this approach can jointly unlearn forget samples while preserving general model performance through a series of low-dimensional experiments. We perform extensive empirical evaluation of our method over a range of contemporary benchmarks, verifying that our method is competitive with state-of-the-art performance under the strict constraints of zero-shot unlearning.
6/6/2024