Inquire, Interact, and Integrate: A Proactive Agent Collaborative Framework for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a proactive agent collaborative framework called "Inquire, Interact, and Integrate" (I3) for zero-shot multimodal medical reasoning.
- The framework involves multiple AI agents collaborating to address complex medical tasks by inquiring about relevant information, interacting to solve the problem, and integrating their findings.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several multimodal medical reasoning tasks, showing that I3 outperforms standalone large language models and autonomous AI agents.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way for AI systems to work together to tackle complex medical problems. The key idea is to have multiple AI "agents" that each have different specialized knowledge and capabilities. These agents can then collaborate by asking each other questions, sharing information, and combining their efforts to solve a task.
For example, one agent might be an expert in medical diagnosis, while another is skilled at interpreting medical images. By working together, they can draw on their respective strengths to come up with a more accurate and comprehensive diagnosis for a patient. The agents can actively inquire about information they're missing, interact to solve the problem, and then integrate their findings into a final solution.
The authors show that this collaborative approach outperforms using a single, standalone AI system or autonomous agents working in isolation. It allows the AI agents to leverage their complementary abilities and work together more effectively than they could on their own.
Technical Explanation
The "Inquire, Interact, and Integrate" (I3) framework proposed in this paper enables multiple AI agents to collaborate on complex multimodal medical reasoning tasks. The key components of the I3 framework are:
- Inquire: The agents can actively ask each other questions to gather relevant information needed to solve the task.
- Interact: The agents collaborate by sharing their knowledge and insights, and working together to find a solution.
- Integrate: The agents combine their individual findings and recommendations into a final, comprehensive solution.
The authors evaluate the I3 framework on several benchmark multimodal medical reasoning tasks, comparing its performance to standalone large language models as well as autonomous AI agents. Their results demonstrate that the I3 framework outperforms these alternative approaches, highlighting the benefits of a collaborative, multiagent approach to complex medical reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The I3 framework represents an interesting and promising approach to multimodal medical reasoning that leverages the complementary capabilities of multiple AI agents. By enabling the agents to actively inquire, interact, and integrate their knowledge, the framework appears to yield superior performance compared to standalone models or autonomous agents.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations and challenges of this approach. For example, it's unclear how the framework would scale to handle an increasing number of agents with diverse expertise, or how the agents would resolve conflicts or disagreements during the collaborative process. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational and resource requirements of the I3 framework, which could be a practical concern for real-world deployment.
Further research is needed to explore these issues and refine the I3 framework to make it more robust and scalable. Nonetheless, the core idea of a collaborative, multiagent approach to complex medical reasoning is intriguing and deserves further exploration, as it could lead to significant advancements in AI-assisted clinical decision-making.
Conclusion
The "Inquire, Interact, and Integrate" (I3) framework presented in this paper offers a novel approach to zero-shot multimodal medical reasoning by enabling multiple AI agents to collaborate and leverage their complementary capabilities. The framework's ability to outperform standalone large language models and autonomous AI agents highlights the potential benefits of a proactive, collaborative approach to complex medical tasks.
While the paper leaves room for further exploration of the framework's limitations and scalability, the core idea of AI agents working together to solve problems holds significant promise for advancing the field of AI-assisted medical decision-making. Continued research in this direction could lead to more robust and effective AI systems capable of tackling the multifaceted challenges of modern healthcare.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Inquire, Interact, and Integrate: A Proactive Agent Collaborative Framework for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning
Zishan Gu, Fenglin Liu, Changchang Yin, Ping Zhang
The adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has attracted significant research interest. However, their performance in healthcare remains under-investigated and potentially limited, due to i) they lack rich domain-specific knowledge and medical reasoning skills; and ii) most state-of-the-art LLMs are unimodal, text-only models that cannot directly process multimodal inputs. To this end, we propose a multimodal medical collaborative reasoning framework textbf{MultiMedRes}, which incorporates a learner agent to proactively gain essential information from domain-specific expert models, to solve medical multimodal reasoning problems. Our method includes three steps: i) textbf{Inquire}: The learner agent first decomposes given complex medical reasoning problems into multiple domain-specific sub-problems; ii) textbf{Interact}: The agent then interacts with domain-specific expert models by repeating the ``ask-answer'' process to progressively obtain different domain-specific knowledge; iii) textbf{Integrate}: The agent finally integrates all the acquired domain-specific knowledge to accurately address the medical reasoning problem. We validate the effectiveness of our method on the task of difference visual question answering for X-ray images. The experiments demonstrate that our zero-shot prediction achieves state-of-the-art performance, and even outperforms the fully supervised methods. Besides, our approach can be incorporated into various LLMs and multimodal LLMs to significantly boost their performance.
Read more5/21/2024
💬
0
MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning
Xiangru Tang, Anni Zou, Zhuosheng Zhang, Ziming Li, Yilun Zhao, Xingyao Zhang, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
Large language models (LLMs), despite their remarkable progress across various general domains, encounter significant barriers in medicine and healthcare. This field faces unique challenges such as domain-specific terminologies and reasoning over specialized knowledge. To address these issues, we propose MedAgents, a novel multi-disciplinary collaboration framework for the medical domain. MedAgents leverages LLM-based agents in a role-playing setting that participate in a collaborative multi-round discussion, thereby enhancing LLM proficiency and reasoning capabilities. This training-free framework encompasses five critical steps: gathering domain experts, proposing individual analyses, summarising these analyses into a report, iterating over discussions until a consensus is reached, and ultimately making a decision. Our work focuses on the zero-shot setting, which is applicable in real-world scenarios. Experimental results on nine datasets (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and six subtasks from MMLU) establish that our proposed MedAgents framework excels at mining and harnessing the medical expertise within LLMs, as well as extending its reasoning abilities. Our code can be found at https://github.com/gersteinlab/MedAgents.
Read more6/6/2024
0
MEDIQ: Question-Asking LLMs for Adaptive and Reliable Medical Reasoning
Shuyue Stella Li, Vidhisha Balachandran, Shangbin Feng, Jonathan Ilgen, Emma Pierson, Pang Wei Koh, Yulia Tsvetkov
In high-stakes domains like clinical reasoning, AI assistants powered by large language models (LLMs) are yet to be reliable and safe. We identify a key obstacle towards reliability: existing LLMs are trained to answer any question, even with incomplete context in the prompt or insufficient parametric knowledge. We propose to change this paradigm to develop more careful LLMs that ask follow-up questions to gather necessary and sufficient information and respond reliably. We introduce MEDIQ, a framework to simulate realistic clinical interactions, which incorporates a Patient System and an adaptive Expert System. The Patient may provide incomplete information in the beginning; the Expert refrains from making diagnostic decisions when unconfident, and instead elicits missing details from the Patient via follow-up questions. To evaluate MEDIQ, we convert MEDQA and CRAFT-MD -- medical benchmarks for diagnostic question answering -- into an interactive setup. We develop a reliable Patient system and prototype several Expert systems, first showing that directly prompting state-of-the-art LLMs to ask questions degrades the quality of clinical reasoning, indicating that adapting LLMs to interactive information-seeking settings is nontrivial. We then augment the Expert with a novel abstention module to better estimate model confidence and decide whether to ask more questions, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy by 20.3%; however, performance still lags compared to an (unrealistic in practice) upper bound when full information is given upfront. Further analyses reveal that interactive performance can be improved by filtering irrelevant contexts and reformatting conversations. Overall, our paper introduces a novel problem towards LLM reliability, a novel MEDIQ framework, and highlights important future directions to extend the information-seeking abilities of LLM assistants in critical domains.
Read more6/5/2024
📈
0
XAI4LLM. Let Machine Learning Models and LLMs Collaborate for Enhanced In-Context Learning in Healthcare
Fatemeh Nazary, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio di Sciascio
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into healthcare diagnostics offers a promising avenue for clinical decision-making. This study outlines the development of a novel method for zero-shot/few-shot in-context learning (ICL) by integrating medical domain knowledge using a multi-layered structured prompt. We also explore the efficacy of two communication styles between the user and LLMs: the Numerical Conversational (NC) style, which processes data incrementally, and the Natural Language Single-Turn (NL-ST) style, which employs long narrative prompts. Our study systematically evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and risk factors, including gender bias and false negative rates, using a dataset of 920 patient records in various few-shot scenarios. Results indicate that traditional clinical machine learning (ML) models generally outperform LLMs in zero-shot and few-shot settings. However, the performance gap narrows significantly when employing few-shot examples alongside effective explainable AI (XAI) methods as sources of domain knowledge. Moreover, with sufficient time and an increased number of examples, the conversational style (NC) nearly matches the performance of ML models. Most notably, LLMs demonstrate comparable or superior cost-sensitive accuracy relative to ML models. This research confirms that, with appropriate domain knowledge and tailored communication strategies, LLMs can significantly enhance diagnostic processes. The findings highlight the importance of optimizing the number of training examples and communication styles to improve accuracy and reduce biases in LLM applications.
Read more6/4/2024