The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education
2403.16081
0
0
🏷️
Abstract
This paper presents a multi dimensional view of AI's role in learning and education, emphasizing the intricate interplay between AI, analytics, and the learning processes. Here, I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualization of AI as stochastic tools, as exemplified in generative AI, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI. I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, the cognitive diversity inherent in AI algorithms, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. Early learning sciences and AI in Education research, which saw AI as an analogy for human intelligence, have diverged from this perspective, prompting a need to rekindle this connection. The paper presents three unique conceptualizations of AI in education: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human thought processes, and the extension of human cognition via tightly integrated human-AI systems. Examples from current research and practice are examined as instances of the three conceptualisations, highlighting the potential value and limitations of each conceptualisation for education, as well as the perils of overemphasis on externalising human cognition as exemplified in today's hype surrounding generative AI tools. The paper concludes with an advocacy for a broader educational approach that includes educating people about AI and innovating educational systems to remain relevant in an AI enabled world.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper explores the multifaceted role of AI in learning and education, emphasizing the complex interplay between AI, analytics, and the learning process.
- It challenges the prevalent view of AI as a stochastic tool, as seen in generative AI, and advocates for alternative conceptualizations of AI.
- The paper highlights the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, the cognitive diversity inherent in AI algorithms, and the potential for AI to serve as a tool for understanding human learning.
- It presents three unique conceptualizations of AI in education: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human thought processes, and the extension of human cognition via tightly integrated human-AI systems.
- The paper concludes with a call for a broader educational approach that includes educating people about AI and innovating educational systems to remain relevant in an AI-enabled world.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the diverse ways in which AI can impact learning and education. It argues that AI should not be seen solely as a tool for generating content, as is often the case with generative AI models. Instead, the paper suggests that AI can be conceptualized in three unique ways:
-
Externalization of Human Cognition: AI can be used to externalize and capture aspects of human thought processes, allowing for a deeper understanding of how people learn.
-
Internalization of AI Models: AI models can be internalized by humans, influencing their thought processes and shaping their learning.
-
Extension of Human Cognition: Tightly integrated human-AI systems can extend and enhance human cognitive abilities in the learning process.
The paper provides examples of current research and practices that illustrate these conceptualizations, highlighting both the potential benefits and limitations of each approach. It also emphasizes the importance of educating people about AI and adapting educational systems to remain relevant in an AI-powered world.
By considering these alternative conceptualizations of AI, the paper aims to move beyond the narrow view of AI as a tool for content generation and explore its multifaceted role in supporting and understanding human learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive examination of the relationship between AI, analytics, and the learning process. It challenges the prevalent conceptualization of AI as a stochastic tool, as seen in generative AI models, and advocates for alternative perspectives.
The authors highlight the key differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, emphasizing the cognitive diversity inherent in AI algorithms. They posit that AI can serve as an instrument for understanding human learning, which has diverged from the earlier research in learning sciences and AI in Education (AIEd) that viewed AI as an analogy for human intelligence.
The paper introduces three distinct conceptualizations of AI in education:
-
Externalization of Human Cognition: This approach leverages AI to externalize and capture aspects of human thought processes, enabling a deeper understanding of how people learn. [See related work on AI-powered distributed agency in second language learning and teaching.]
-
Internalization of AI Models: In this conceptualization, AI models are internalized by humans, influencing their thought processes and shaping their learning. [Explore further research on AI-powered personalized learning and AI tutoring systems in software engineering education.]
-
Extension of Human Cognition: The paper explores the potential of tightly integrated human-AI systems to extend and enhance human cognitive abilities in the learning process.
The authors examine examples from current research and practice to illustrate these conceptualizations, highlighting the potential value and limitations of each approach. They also caution against the overemphasis on externalizing human cognition, as exemplified in the hype surrounding generative AI tools.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and nuanced perspective on the role of AI in learning and education, moving beyond the common perception of AI as a tool for content generation. By introducing three distinct conceptualizations of AI's integration with the learning process, the authors encourage a more comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between AI, analytics, and human cognition.
One potential limitation of the paper is the lack of empirical data or case studies to fully substantiate the claims and examples provided. While the conceptual frameworks are compelling, additional evidence from real-world implementations and their impact on learning outcomes would further strengthen the arguments. [Insights from research on trust in AI progress, challenges, and future directions could also inform this discussion.]
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the potential pitfalls and ethical considerations of these AI-powered approaches to learning. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into educational settings, it is crucial to address concerns around AI-driven knowledge collapse, algorithmic bias, and the unintended consequences of AI-mediated learning experiences.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse on the role of AI in education, challenging the status quo and offering alternative conceptualizations that warrant further exploration and empirical validation.
Conclusion
This paper provides a multidimensional perspective on the role of AI in learning and education, moving beyond the narrow view of AI as a tool for content generation. By introducing three unique conceptualizations of AI's integration with the learning process - the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models, and the extension of human cognition - the authors encourage a more comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between AI, analytics, and human learning.
The paper highlights the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, the cognitive diversity inherent in AI algorithms, and the potential for AI to serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. The discussion of current research and practice examples helps to illustrate the potential value and limitations of each conceptualization, while also cautioning against the overemphasis on externalizing human cognition.
Ultimately, the paper advocates for a broader educational approach that includes educating people about AI and innovating educational systems to remain relevant in an AI-enabled world. By considering these alternative conceptualizations of AI, the authors aim to expand the discourse and pave the way for more thoughtful integration of AI technologies in the learning and education domains.
Related Papers
Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation
Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady
0
0
As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.
4/19/2024
Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment
Antonette Shibani, Simon Knight, Kirsty Kitto, Ajanie Karunanayake, Simon Buckingham Shum
0
0
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a ubiquitous part of society, but a key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills to interact with machines effectively by understanding their capabilities and limitations. These skills are particularly important for learners to develop in the age of generative AI where AI tools can demonstrate complex knowledge and ability previously thought to be uniquely human. To activate effective human-AI partnerships in writing, this paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI. Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process. We believe that the outcomes can lead to better task and tool design in the future for learners to develop deep, critical thinking when interacting with AI.
4/11/2024
💬
Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI
Robert Godwin-Jones
0
0
Generative AI offers significant opportunities for language learning. Tools like ChatGPT can provide informal second language practice through chats in written or voice forms, with the learner specifying through prompts conversational parameters such as proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics. AI can be instructed to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, or develop an extended study plan. Instructors can use AI to build learning and assessment materials in a variety of media. AI is likely to make immersive technologies more powerful and versatile, moving away from scripted interactions. For both learners and teachers, it is important to understand the limitations of AI systems that arise from their purely statistical model of human language, which limits their ability to deal with nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, there are ethical concerns over how AI systems are created as well as practical constraints in their use, especially for less privileged populations. The power and versatility of AI tools are likely to turn them into valuable and constant companions in many peoples lives (akin to smartphones), creating a close connection that goes beyond simple tool use. Ecological theories such as sociomaterialism are helpful in examining the shared agency that develops through close user-AI interactions, as are the perspectives on human-object relations from Indigenous cultures.
4/1/2024
🤖
How Could AI Support Design Education? A Study Across Fields Fuels Situating Analytics
Ajit Jain, Andruid Kerne, Hannah Fowler, Jinsil Seo, Galen Newman, Nic Lupfer, Aaron Perrine
0
0
We use the process and findings from a case study of design educators' practices of assessment and feedback to fuel theorizing about how to make AI useful in service of human experience. We build on Suchman's theory of situated actions. We perform a qualitative study of 11 educators in 5 fields, who teach design processes situated in project-based learning contexts. Through qualitative data gathering and analysis, we derive codes: design process; assessment and feedback challenges; and computational support. We twice invoke creative cognition's family resemblance principle. First, to explain how design instructors already use assessment rubrics and second, to explain the analogous role for design creativity analytics: no particular trait is necessary or sufficient; each only tends to indicate good design work. Human teachers remain essential. We develop a set of situated design creativity analytics--Fluency, Flexibility, Visual Consistency, Multiscale Organization, and Legible Contrast--to support instructors' efforts, by providing on-demand, learning objectives-based assessment and feedback to students. We theorize a methodology, which we call situating analytics, firstly because making AI support living human activity depends on aligning what analytics measure with situated practices. Further, we realize that analytics can become most significant to users by situating them through interfaces that integrate them into the material contexts of their use. Here, this means situating design creativity analytics into actual design environments. Through the case study, we identify situating analytics as a methodology for explaining analytics to users, because the iterative process of alignment with practice has the potential to enable data scientists to derive analytics that make sense as part of and support situated human experiences.
4/29/2024