Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment
2404.06955
0
0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a ubiquitous part of society, but a key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills to interact with machines effectively by understanding their capabilities and limitations. These skills are particularly important for learners to develop in the age of generative AI where AI tools can demonstrate complex knowledge and ability previously thought to be uniquely human. To activate effective human-AI partnerships in writing, this paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI. Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process. We believe that the outcomes can lead to better task and tool design in the future for learners to develop deep, critical thinking when interacting with AI.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper explores the critical interaction between students and AI systems in the context of written assessments.
- The researchers aim to characterize and understand the complex dynamics that arise when students engage with AI-powered writing tools.
- The study investigates the potential challenges and implications of AI integration in educational settings, particularly in the realm of student writing and assessment.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the relationship between students and artificial intelligence (AI) systems when it comes to written assignments and assessments. The researchers wanted to understand how students interact with AI tools that can help them with their writing, and what kind of challenges or issues might arise from this interaction.
The researchers were interested in exploring the complex dynamics that emerge when students use AI-powered writing assistants or chatbots, like ChatGPT, to help them with their assignments. They wanted to see how this integration of AI in the educational process might affect the way students approach their writing, and what the potential consequences or challenges could be.
For example, the researchers might have explored how students might over-rely on the AI system, or how the AI system might influence the students' own critical thinking and writing skills. They may have also looked at how teachers and institutions could navigate this integration of AI in education and ensure that students are still developing the necessary skills and knowledge.
Technical Explanation
The paper aims to characterize the critical interaction between students and AI systems in the context of written assessments. The researchers conducted a study to understand the complex dynamics that arise when students engage with AI-powered writing tools.
The study explored the potential challenges and implications of integrating AI in educational settings, particularly in the realm of student writing and assessment. The researchers collected data from various sources, including student surveys, written assignments, and observations of student-AI interactions.
The data analysis focused on identifying patterns, themes, and potential issues that emerged from the students' use of AI writing tools. The researchers examined factors such as the students' reliance on the AI system, the impact on their critical thinking and writing skills, and the potential for academic dishonesty or plagiarism.
The findings of the study provide insights into the complex interplay between students, AI systems, and the educational context. The researchers highlighted the need for further research and the development of strategies to help educators and institutions navigate the integration of AI in education while ensuring that students develop the necessary skills and knowledge.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling exploration of the critical interaction between students and AI systems in the context of written assessments. The researchers have raised important questions and highlighted the need for a deeper understanding of the implications of AI integration in educational settings.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size and the specific educational context in which it was conducted. The researchers acknowledge the need for further research to validate the findings and explore the generalizability of the results to a wider range of educational settings and student populations.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI in educational assessments, such as issues of fairness, bias, and the potential for misuse or abuse of the technology.
Future research could explore these ethical concerns in greater depth and provide guidance to educators and policymakers on responsible and equitable integration of AI in educational contexts.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable insights into the complex interplay between students and AI systems in the context of written assessments. The researchers have highlighted the need for a deeper understanding of the challenges and implications of AI integration in education, particularly in relation to the development of critical thinking and writing skills.
The findings of this study have the potential to inform the development of strategies and policies that can help educators and institutions navigate the integration of AI in education while ensuring that students are empowered to become critical and independent thinkers. Further research in this area could contribute to the ongoing dialogue around the responsible and ethical use of AI in educational settings.
Related Papers
🤖
Augmenting the Author: Exploring the Potential of AI Collaboration in Academic Writing
Joseph Tu, Hilda Hadan, Derrick M. Wang, Sabrina A Sgandurra, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Lennart E. Nacke
0
0
This workshop paper presents a critical examination of the integration of Generative AI (Gen AI) into the academic writing process, focusing on the use of AI as a collaborative tool. It contrasts the performance and interaction of two AI models, Gemini and ChatGPT, through a collaborative inquiry approach where researchers engage in facilitated sessions to design prompts that elicit specific AI responses for crafting research outlines. This case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the AI's limitations to ensure responsible and effective AI integration in scholarly work. Preliminary findings suggest that prompt variation significantly affects output quality and reveals distinct capabilities and constraints of each model. The paper contributes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction by exploring effective prompt strategies and providing a comparative analysis of Gen AI models, ultimately aiming to enhance AI-assisted academic writing and prompt a deeper dialogue within the HCI community.
4/26/2024
🏷️
The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education
Mutlu Cukurova
0
0
This paper presents a multi dimensional view of AI's role in learning and education, emphasizing the intricate interplay between AI, analytics, and the learning processes. Here, I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualization of AI as stochastic tools, as exemplified in generative AI, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI. I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, the cognitive diversity inherent in AI algorithms, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. Early learning sciences and AI in Education research, which saw AI as an analogy for human intelligence, have diverged from this perspective, prompting a need to rekindle this connection. The paper presents three unique conceptualizations of AI in education: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human thought processes, and the extension of human cognition via tightly integrated human-AI systems. Examples from current research and practice are examined as instances of the three conceptualisations, highlighting the potential value and limitations of each conceptualisation for education, as well as the perils of overemphasis on externalising human cognition as exemplified in today's hype surrounding generative AI tools. The paper concludes with an advocacy for a broader educational approach that includes educating people about AI and innovating educational systems to remain relevant in an AI enabled world.
4/8/2024
🤔
AI-Assisted Writing in Education: Ecosystem Risks and Mitigations
Antonette Shibani, Simon Buckingham Shum
0
0
While the excitement around the capabilities of technological advancements is giving rise to new AI-based writing assistants, the overarching ecosystem plays a crucial role in how they are adopted in educational practice. In this paper, we point to key ecological aspects for consideration. We draw insights from extensive research integrated with practice on a writing feedback tool over 9 years at a university, and we highlight potential risks when these are overlooked. It informs the design of educational writing support tools to be better aligned within broader contexts to balance innovation with practical impact.
4/17/2024
Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation
Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady
0
0
As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.
4/19/2024