Interpretability of Uncertainty: Exploring Cortical Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis

Read original: arXiv:2407.05761 - Published 7/9/2024 by Nataliia Molchanova, Alessandro Cagol, Pedro M. Gordaliza, Mario Ocampo-Pineda, Po-Jui Lu, Matthias Weigel, Xinjie Chen, Adrien Depeursinge, Cristina Granziera, Henning Muller and 1 other
Total Score

0

Interpretability of Uncertainty: Exploring Cortical Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the interpretability of uncertainty in deep learning models for segmenting cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.
  • The authors investigate how instance-wise uncertainty estimates can provide valuable insights into the model's decision-making process, enhancing the reliability and transparency of the segmentation results.
  • The research builds upon previous work on uncertainty quantification in biomedical image segmentation, such as Structural-based Uncertainty in Deep Learning Across Anatomy and QUBiq: Uncertainty Quantification in Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on understanding the uncertainty in deep learning models used to identify and segment (divide into separate parts) cortical lesions, which are areas of damage or scarring on the outer layer of the brain, in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system, causing a wide range of symptoms.

The researchers wanted to explore how the uncertainty estimates generated by these deep learning models could provide additional insights into the decision-making process of the models. This could help make the models more transparent and reliable, allowing doctors and researchers to better understand why the models are making certain predictions.

The authors built on previous work that has looked at quantifying uncertainty in biomedical image segmentation, such as Structural-based Uncertainty in Deep Learning Across Anatomy and QUBiq: Uncertainty Quantification in Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge. By understanding the uncertainty in the model's predictions, the researchers hope to improve the overall reliability and interpretability of the cortical lesion segmentation process.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used a deep learning model to segment cortical lesions in MRI scans of multiple sclerosis patients. They incorporated uncertainty quantification techniques to generate instance-wise uncertainty estimates, which provide information about the model's confidence in its predictions for each individual lesion.

The authors evaluated their approach on a publicly available dataset of MRI scans from multiple sclerosis patients. They compared the segmentation performance of their model with and without the uncertainty information, and also analyzed the relationship between the uncertainty estimates and the instance-level quantitative saliency of the segmented lesions.

The results showed that the uncertainty estimates can provide valuable insights into the model's decision-making process, helping to identify areas of the segmentation that are more reliable or more uncertain. This information can be useful for providing enhanced reliability of semantic segmentation in a clinical setting.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive survey of uncertainty quantification in deep learning and demonstrates its application to the specific problem of cortical lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis. The authors acknowledge that their approach relies on the availability of a well-annotated dataset, which may not always be the case in real-world clinical settings.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impact of dataset bias or model generalization to different patient populations or imaging modalities. Further research may be needed to understand how the uncertainty estimates behave in more diverse and challenging scenarios.

The authors also note that the interpretability of the uncertainty estimates depends on the specific visualization techniques used, and there may be room for improvement in terms of making the uncertainty information more intuitive and actionable for clinicians.

Conclusion

This research paper highlights the importance of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for biomedical image segmentation tasks, such as the identification of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis patients. By providing instance-wise uncertainty estimates, the models can become more transparent and reliable, potentially enhancing their clinical utility and acceptance.

The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of work on uncertainty quantification in deep learning for biomedical applications, and the insights gained can inform the development of more interpretable and trustworthy AI systems for medical imaging analysis.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Interpretability of Uncertainty: Exploring Cortical Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
Total Score

0

Interpretability of Uncertainty: Exploring Cortical Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis

Nataliia Molchanova, Alessandro Cagol, Pedro M. Gordaliza, Mario Ocampo-Pineda, Po-Jui Lu, Matthias Weigel, Xinjie Chen, Adrien Depeursinge, Cristina Granziera, Henning Muller, Meritxell Bach Cuadra

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has become critical for evaluating the reliability of artificial intelligence systems, especially in medical image segmentation. This study addresses the interpretability of instance-wise uncertainty values in deep learning models for focal lesion segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging, specifically cortical lesion (CL) segmentation in multiple sclerosis. CL segmentation presents several challenges, including the complexity of manual segmentation, high variability in annotation, data scarcity, and class imbalance, all of which contribute to aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. We explore how UQ can be used not only to assess prediction reliability but also to provide insights into model behavior, detect biases, and verify the accuracy of UQ methods. Our research demonstrates the potential of instance-wise uncertainty values to offer post hoc global model explanations, serving as a sanity check for the model. The implementation is available at https://github.com/NataliiaMolch/interpret-lesion-unc.

Read more

7/9/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Structural-Based Uncertainty in Deep Learning Across Anatomical Scales: Analysis in White Matter Lesion Segmentation

Nataliia Molchanova, Vatsal Raina, Andrey Malinin, Francesco La Rosa, Adrien Depeursinge, Mark Gales, Cristina Granziera, Henning Muller, Mara Graziani, Meritxell Bach Cuadra

This paper explores uncertainty quantification (UQ) as an indicator of the trustworthiness of automated deep-learning (DL) tools in the context of white matter lesion (WML) segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Our study focuses on two principal aspects of uncertainty in structured output segmentation tasks. Firstly, we postulate that a good uncertainty measure should indicate predictions likely to be incorrect with high uncertainty values. Second, we investigate the merit of quantifying uncertainty at different anatomical scales (voxel, lesion, or patient). We hypothesize that uncertainty at each scale is related to specific types of errors. Our study aims to confirm this relationship by conducting separate analyses for in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Our primary methodological contributions are (i) the development of novel measures for quantifying uncertainty at lesion and patient scales, derived from structural prediction discrepancies, and (ii) the extension of an error retention curve analysis framework to facilitate the evaluation of UQ performance at both lesion and patient scales. The results from a multi-centric MRI dataset of 334 patients demonstrate that our proposed measures more effectively capture model errors at the lesion and patient scales compared to measures that average voxel-scale uncertainty values. We provide the UQ protocols code at https://github.com/Medical-Image-Analysis-Laboratory/MS_WML_uncs.

Read more

4/29/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge

Hongwei Bran Li, Fernando Navarro, Ivan Ezhov, Amirhossein Bayat, Dhritiman Das, Florian Kofler, Suprosanna Shit, Diana Waldmannstetter, Johannes C. Paetzold, Xiaobin Hu, Benedikt Wiestler, Lucas Zimmer, Tamaz Amiranashvili, Chinmay Prabhakar, Christoph Berger, Jonas Weidner, Michelle Alonso-Basant, Arif Rashid, Ujjwal Baid, Wesam Adel, Deniz Ali, Bhakti Baheti, Yingbin Bai, Ishaan Bhatt, Sabri Can Cetindag, Wenting Chen, Li Cheng, Prasad Dutand, Lara Dular, Mustafa A. Elattar, Ming Feng, Shengbo Gao, Henkjan Huisman, Weifeng Hu, Shubham Innani, Wei Jiat, Davood Karimi, Hugo J. Kuijf, Jin Tae Kwak, Hoang Long Le, Xiang Lia, Huiyan Lin, Tongliang Liu, Jun Ma, Kai Ma, Ting Ma, Ilkay Oksuz, Robbie Holland, Arlindo L. Oliveira, Jimut Bahan Pal, Xuan Pei, Maoying Qiao, Anindo Saha, Raghavendra Selvan, Linlin Shen, Joao Lourenco Silva, Ziga Spiclin, Sanjay Talbar, Dadong Wang, Wei Wang, Xiong Wang, Yin Wang, Ruiling Xia, Kele Xu, Yanwu Yan, Mert Yergin, Shuang Yu, Lingxi Zeng, YingLin Zhang, Jiachen Zhao, Yefeng Zheng, Martin Zukovec, Richard Do, Anton Becker, Amber Simpson, Ender Konukoglu, Andras Jakab, Spyridon Bakas, Leo Joskowicz, Bjoern Menze

Uncertainty in medical image segmentation tasks, especially inter-rater variability, arising from differences in interpretations and annotations by various experts, presents a significant challenge in achieving consistent and reliable image segmentation. This variability not only reflects the inherent complexity and subjective nature of medical image interpretation but also directly impacts the development and evaluation of automated segmentation algorithms. Accurately modeling and quantifying this variability is essential for enhancing the robustness and clinical applicability of these algorithms. We report the set-up and summarize the benchmark results of the Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge (QUBIQ), which was organized in conjunction with International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2020 and 2021. The challenge focuses on the uncertainty quantification of medical image segmentation which considers the omnipresence of inter-rater variability in imaging datasets. The large collection of images with multi-rater annotations features various modalities such as MRI and CT; various organs such as the brain, prostate, kidney, and pancreas; and different image dimensions 2D-vs-3D. A total of 24 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, Bayesian neural networks, and ensemble model techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of the ensemble models, as well as the need for further research to develop efficient 3D methods for uncertainty quantification methods in 3D segmentation tasks.

Read more

6/26/2024

Instance-level quantitative saliency in multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation
Total Score

0

Instance-level quantitative saliency in multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation

Federico Spagnolo, Nataliia Molchanova, Roger Schaer, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Mario Ocampo Pineda, Lester Melie-Garcia, Cristina Granziera, Vincent Andrearczyk, Adrien Depeursinge

In recent years, explainable methods for artificial intelligence (XAI) have tried to reveal and describe models' decision mechanisms in the case of classification tasks. However, XAI for semantic segmentation and in particular for single instances has been little studied to date. Understanding the process underlying automatic segmentation of single instances is crucial to reveal what information was used to detect and segment a given object of interest. In this study, we proposed two instance-level explanation maps for semantic segmentation based on SmoothGrad and Grad-CAM++ methods. Then, we investigated their relevance for the detection and segmentation of white matter lesions (WML), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS). 687 patients diagnosed with MS for a total of 4043 FLAIR and MPRAGE MRI scans were collected at the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland. Data were randomly split into training, validation and test sets to train a 3D U-Net for MS lesion segmentation. We observed 3050 true positive (TP), 1818 false positive (FP), and 789 false negative (FN) cases. We generated instance-level explanation maps for semantic segmentation, by developing two XAI methods based on SmoothGrad and Grad-CAM++. We investigated: 1) the distribution of gradients in saliency maps with respect to both input MRI sequences; 2) the model's response in the case of synthetic lesions; 3) the amount of perilesional tissue needed by the model to segment a lesion. Saliency maps (based on SmoothGrad) in FLAIR showed positive values inside a lesion and negative in its neighborhood. Peak values of saliency maps generated for these four groups of volumes presented distributions that differ significantly from one another, suggesting a quantitative nature of the proposed saliency. Contextual information of 7mm around the lesion border was required for their segmentation.

Read more

6/26/2024