Investigating Causal Cues: Strengthening Spoofed Audio Detection with Human-Discernible Linguistic Features
0
š
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers have identified several types of spoofed audio, such as mimicry, replay attacks, and deepfakes, that can compromise information integrity.
- Experts have labeled spoofed audio samples with linguistic features that can be heard by the human ear, including pitch, pause, word sounds, breathing, and audio quality.
- Incorporating these linguistic features has been shown to improve the performance of deepfake detection algorithms.
- This paper explores the causal relationships between these linguistic features and the detection of spoofed audio, comparing the causal models to expert ground truth labeling.
Plain English Explanation
The research in this paper focuses on the challenge of spoofed audio, which refers to audio recordings that have been manipulated or fabricated to deceive listeners. This can include techniques like mimicry, where someone impersonates another person's voice, replay attacks, where a recording is simply played back, and deepfakes, which use artificial intelligence to generate fake audio.
The researchers worked with sociolinguistics experts to identify specific linguistic features in the audio that can be heard by the human ear, such as the pitch and pauses in the speech, the sounds of consonant stops at the beginning and end of words, the audible breathing of the speaker, and the overall audio quality.
The researchers found that incorporating these linguistic features into deepfake detection algorithms improved their performance in identifying spoofed audio. This paper then investigates the causal relationships between these linguistic features and the detection of spoofed audio, comparing the causal models to the expert labels used to train the algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used a hybrid dataset composed of multiple types of spoofed audio samples, including mimicry, replay attacks, and deepfakes. These audio samples were annotated with the Expert Defined Linguistic Features (EDLFs) identified by the sociolinguistics experts.
The researchers then employed causal discovery and causal inference techniques to investigate the relationships between the linguistic features and the labels indicating whether the audio was spoofed or genuine. They compared the insights from the causal models to the expert ground truth labeling of the audio samples.
The findings suggest that the causal models demonstrate the utility of incorporating linguistic features to improve the detection of spoofed audio. The researchers also highlight the value of integrating human domain knowledge into AI models and techniques to strengthen their performance.
The causal discovery and inference can serve as a foundation for training humans to identify spoofed audio, as well as automating the process of labeling audio samples with EDLFs to further improve the performance of AI-based spoofed audio detectors.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling approach to leveraging linguistic features to enhance the detection of spoofed audio. By collaborating with sociolinguistics experts, the researchers were able to identify a set of discernible cues that human listeners can use to distinguish genuine from manipulated audio.
However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of relying on these linguistic features. For example, it is unclear how robust the features are to different types of audio manipulation or across diverse speaker characteristics and accents. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the scalability of the expert labeling process or the challenges of automating EDLF annotation.
Further research could explore the generalizability of the linguistic features, the development of more efficient annotation methods, and the integration of the causal insights into end-to-end deepfake detection systems. Addressing these areas could strengthen the practical applicability of the approach and help mitigate the societal challenges posed by spoofed audio.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing the detection of spoofed audio by incorporating sociolinguistic features that can be discerned by the human ear. The causal discovery and inference techniques demonstrate the utility of these linguistic features and the value of integrating human domain knowledge into AI models.
The findings suggest that this approach can serve as a foundation for training humans to identify spoofed audio, as well as automating the annotation of audio samples to improve the performance of deepfake detection algorithms. By addressing the challenge of spoofed audio, this research contributes to strengthening the integrity of information and combating the societal issues arising from the proliferation of audio-based misinformation and disinformation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
0
Investigating Causal Cues: Strengthening Spoofed Audio Detection with Human-Discernible Linguistic Features
Zahra Khanjani, Tolulope Ale, Jianwu Wang, Lavon Davis, Christine Mallinson, Vandana P. Janeja
Several types of spoofed audio, such as mimicry, replay attacks, and deepfakes, have created societal challenges to information integrity. Recently, researchers have worked with sociolinguistics experts to label spoofed audio samples with Expert Defined Linguistic Features (EDLFs) that can be discerned by the human ear: pitch, pause, word-initial and word-final release bursts of consonant stops, audible intake or outtake of breath, and overall audio quality. It is established that there is an improvement in several deepfake detection algorithms when they augmented the traditional and common features of audio data with these EDLFs. In this paper, using a hybrid dataset comprised of multiple types of spoofed audio augmented with sociolinguistic annotations, we investigate causal discovery and inferences between the discernible linguistic features and the label in the audio clips, comparing the findings of the causal models with the expert ground truth validation labeling process. Our findings suggest that the causal models indicate the utility of incorporating linguistic features to help discern spoofed audio, as well as the overall need and opportunity to incorporate human knowledge into models and techniques for strengthening AI models. The causal discovery and inference can be used as a foundation of training humans to discern spoofed audio as well as automating EDLFs labeling for the purpose of performance improvement of the common AI-based spoofed audio detectors.
Read more9/11/2024
š
0
Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?
Nicolas M. Muller, Pavel Czempin, Franziska Dieckmann, Adam Froghyar, Konstantin Bottinger
Current text-to-speech algorithms produce realistic fakes of human voices, making deepfake detection a much-needed area of research. While researchers have presented various techniques for detecting audio spoofs, it is often unclear exactly why these architectures are successful: Preprocessing steps, hyperparameter settings, and the degree of fine-tuning are not consistent across related work. Which factors contribute to success, and which are accidental? In this work, we address this problem: We systematize audio spoofing detection by re-implementing and uniformly evaluating architectures from related work. We identify overarching features for successful audio deepfake detection, such as using cqtspec or logspec features instead of melspec features, which improves performance by 37% EER on average, all other factors constant. Additionally, we evaluate generalization capabilities: We collect and publish a new dataset consisting of 37.9 hours of found audio recordings of celebrities and politicians, of which 17.2 hours are deepfakes. We find that related work performs poorly on such real-world data (performance degradation of up to one thousand percent). This may suggest that the community has tailored its solutions too closely to the prevailing ASVSpoof benchmark and that deepfakes are much harder to detect outside the lab than previously thought.
Read more8/28/2024
š
0
Audio Anti-Spoofing Detection: A Survey
Menglu Li, Yasaman Ahmadiadli, Xiao-Ping Zhang
The availability of smart devices leads to an exponential increase in multimedia content. However, the rapid advancements in deep learning have given rise to sophisticated algorithms capable of manipulating or creating multimedia fake content, known as Deepfake. Audio Deepfakes pose a significant threat by producing highly realistic voices, thus facilitating the spread of misinformation. To address this issue, numerous audio anti-spoofing detection challenges have been organized to foster the development of anti-spoofing countermeasures. This survey paper presents a comprehensive review of every component within the detection pipeline, including algorithm architectures, optimization techniques, application generalizability, evaluation metrics, performance comparisons, available datasets, and open-source availability. For each aspect, we conduct a systematic evaluation of the recent advancements, along with discussions on existing challenges. Additionally, we also explore emerging research topics on audio anti-spoofing, including partial spoofing detection, cross-dataset evaluation, and adversarial attack defence, while proposing some promising research directions for future work. This survey paper not only identifies the current state-of-the-art to establish strong baselines for future experiments but also guides future researchers on a clear path for understanding and enhancing the audio anti-spoofing detection mechanisms.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Source Tracing of Audio Deepfake Systems
Nicholas Klein, Tianxiang Chen, Hemlata Tak, Ricardo Casal, Elie Khoury
Recent progress in generative AI technology has made audio deepfakes remarkably more realistic. While current research on anti-spoofing systems primarily focuses on assessing whether a given audio sample is fake or genuine, there has been limited attention on discerning the specific techniques to create the audio deepfakes. Algorithms commonly used in audio deepfake generation, like text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC), undergo distinct stages including input processing, acoustic modeling, and waveform generation. In this work, we introduce a system designed to classify various spoofing attributes, capturing the distinctive features of individual modules throughout the entire generation pipeline. We evaluate our system on two datasets: the ASVspoof 2019 Logical Access and the Multi-Language Audio Anti-Spoofing Dataset (MLAAD). Results from both experiments demonstrate the robustness of the system to identify the different spoofing attributes of deepfake generation systems.
Read more7/12/2024