Is Your Anomaly Detector Ready for Change? Adapting AIOps Solutions to the Real World

Read original: arXiv:2311.10421 - Published 4/12/2024 by Lorena Poenaru-Olaru, Natalia Karpova, Luis Cruz, Jan Rellermeyer, Arie van Deursen
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Anomaly detection is critical for monitoring IT systems and operations
  • Machine learning algorithms are trained on operational data and continuously evaluated on new data
  • As operational data changes over time, the performance of anomaly detection models can degrade, requiring continuous model maintenance
  • This paper analyzes two techniques for updating anomaly detection models: blind model retraining and informed model retraining
  • The paper also investigates the effects of retraining the model on all available data (full-history) versus just the newest data (sliding window)
  • The paper examines whether a data change monitoring tool can determine when the anomaly detection model needs to be updated

Plain English Explanation

Anomaly detection is a crucial technique for automatically monitoring the health of IT systems and operations. This process involves training machine learning algorithms on historical data that represents normal system behavior. These models are then used to continuously evaluate new data, looking for deviations that could signal a problem.

However, the operational data used to train these models is constantly changing over time. This can cause the performance of the anomaly detection models to degrade, as they are no longer accurately capturing the current state of the system. To address this, the researchers in this paper explored different techniques for updating the anomaly detection models to keep them aligned with the evolving data.

The two main approaches they analyzed were "blind" model retraining, where the model is simply retrained on all available data, and "informed" model retraining, where a tool is used to detect when the data has changed enough to warrant an update. They also looked at the tradeoffs between retraining the model on all historical data versus just the most recent data.

By understanding the best practices for continuously updating anomaly detection models, organizations can ensure that their IT monitoring systems remain effective over time, automatically detecting incidents and anomalies as they occur.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates two approaches for maintaining the performance of anomaly detection models over time as operational data changes: blind model retraining and informed model retraining.

In the blind retraining approach, the anomaly detection model is simply retrained on all available data at regular intervals, without any specific trigger for the update. This ensures the model remains aligned with the current state of the system, but requires significant computational resources.

The informed retraining approach uses a data change monitoring tool to detect when the operational data has shifted enough to warrant an update to the anomaly detection model. This is a more targeted approach that only triggers retraining when necessary, potentially reducing the computational burden.

The paper also explores the effects of retraining the model on all historical data (full-history) versus just the newest data (sliding window). The full-history approach ensures the model has a comprehensive understanding of the system's behavior over time, but may be slower to adapt to recent changes. The sliding window approach is more agile, but risks losing important context from older data.

Through experiments on real-world datasets, the researchers provide insights into the tradeoffs between these different model maintenance strategies in terms of detection performance and computational cost.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable analysis of the challenges involved in maintaining the performance of anomaly detection models over time. However, it is important to note that the researchers only evaluated their techniques on a limited set of datasets, and the effectiveness may vary depending on the specific characteristics of the operational data and the IT environment.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for concept drift, where the underlying patterns in the data gradually change over time in ways that are not easily captured by retraining the model. This could be an important consideration, especially in dynamic IT environments.

Another limitation is that the paper does not explore the use of more sophisticated model update strategies, such as incremental learning or meta-learning, which may be able to adapt the models more efficiently as the data changes.

Overall, the research provides a solid foundation for understanding the challenges of maintaining anomaly detection models in production environments, but further exploration of more advanced techniques and a wider range of use cases would be valuable to the field.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the critical importance of continuously maintaining anomaly detection models to ensure they remain effective as operational data changes over time. The researchers analyzed two different model update strategies, blind retraining and informed retraining, as well as the tradeoffs between retraining on all historical data versus just the most recent data.

By understanding these model maintenance techniques, organizations can more effectively automate the monitoring of their IT systems and operations, ensuring that anomalies and incidents are detected in a timely manner. This can lead to improved system reliability, reduced downtime, and more efficient incident response.

The insights from this research can also inform the development of more advanced anomaly detection systems that are capable of continuously adapting to changes in the underlying data, paving the way for more robust and reliable IT operations management.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Is Your Anomaly Detector Ready for Change? Adapting AIOps Solutions to the Real World

Lorena Poenaru-Olaru, Natalia Karpova, Luis Cruz, Jan Rellermeyer, Arie van Deursen

Anomaly detection techniques are essential in automating the monitoring of IT systems and operations. These techniques imply that machine learning algorithms are trained on operational data corresponding to a specific period of time and that they are continuously evaluated on newly emerging data. Operational data is constantly changing over time, which affects the performance of deployed anomaly detection models. Therefore, continuous model maintenance is required to preserve the performance of anomaly detectors over time. In this work, we analyze two different anomaly detection model maintenance techniques in terms of the model update frequency, namely blind model retraining and informed model retraining. We further investigate the effects of updating the model by retraining it on all the available data (full-history approach) and only the newest data (sliding window approach). Moreover, we investigate whether a data change monitoring tool is capable of determining when the anomaly detection model needs to be updated through retraining.

Read more

4/12/2024

Total Score

0

Lifelong Continual Learning for Anomaly Detection: New Challenges, Perspectives, and Insights

Kamil Faber, Roberto Corizzo, Bartlomiej Sniezynski, Nathalie Japkowicz

Anomaly detection is of paramount importance in many real-world domains, characterized by evolving behavior. Lifelong learning represents an emerging trend, answering the need for machine learning models that continuously adapt to new challenges in dynamic environments while retaining past knowledge. However, limited efforts are dedicated to building foundations for lifelong anomaly detection, which provides intrinsically different challenges compared to the more widely explored classification setting. In this paper, we face this issue by exploring, motivating, and discussing lifelong anomaly detection, trying to build foundations for its wider adoption. First, we explain why lifelong anomaly detection is relevant, defining challenges and opportunities to design anomaly detection methods that deal with lifelong learning complexities. Second, we characterize learning settings and a scenario generation procedure that enables researchers to experiment with lifelong anomaly detection using existing datasets. Third, we perform experiments with popular anomaly detection methods on proposed lifelong scenarios, emphasizing the gap in performance that could be gained with the adoption of lifelong learning. Overall, we conclude that the adoption of lifelong anomaly detection is important to design more robust models that provide a comprehensive view of the environment, as well as simultaneous adaptation and knowledge retention.

Read more

4/3/2024

Pattern-Based Time-Series Risk Scoring for Anomaly Detection and Alert Filtering -- A Predictive Maintenance Case Study
Total Score

0

Pattern-Based Time-Series Risk Scoring for Anomaly Detection and Alert Filtering -- A Predictive Maintenance Case Study

Elad Liebman

Fault detection is a key challenge in the management of complex systems. In the context of SparkCognition's efforts towards predictive maintenance in large scale industrial systems, this problem is often framed in terms of anomaly detection - identifying patterns of behavior in the data which deviate from normal. Patterns of normal behavior aren't captured simply in the coarse statistics of measured signals. Rather, the multivariate sequential pattern itself can be indicative of normal vs. abnormal behavior. For this reason, normal behavior modeling that relies on snapshots of the data without taking into account temporal relationships as they evolve would be lacking. However, common strategies for dealing with temporal dependence, such as Recurrent Neural Networks or attention mechanisms are oftentimes computationally expensive and difficult to train. In this paper, we propose a fast and efficient approach to anomaly detection and alert filtering based on sequential pattern similarities. In our empirical analysis section, we show how this approach can be leveraged for a variety of purposes involving anomaly detection on a large scale real-world industrial system. Subsequently, we test our approach on a publicly-available dataset in order to establish its general applicability and robustness compared to a state-of-the-art baseline. We also demonstrate an efficient way of optimizing the framework based on an alert recall objective function.

Read more

5/29/2024

Anomaly Detection Within Mission-Critical Call Processing
Total Score

0

Anomaly Detection Within Mission-Critical Call Processing

Sean Doris, Iosif Salem, Stefan Schmid

With increasingly larger and more complex telecommunication networks, there is a need for improved monitoring and reliability. Requirements increase further when working with mission-critical systems requiring stable operations to meet precise design and client requirements while maintaining high availability. This paper proposes a novel methodology for developing a machine learning model that can assist in maintaining availability (through anomaly detection) for client-server communications in mission-critical systems. To that end, we validate our methodology for training models based on data classified according to client performance. The proposed methodology evaluates the use of machine learning to perform anomaly detection of a single virtualized server loaded with simulated network traffic (using SIPp) with media calls. The collected data for the models are classified based on the round trip time performance experienced on the client side to determine if the trained models can detect anomalous client side performance only using key performance indicators available on the server. We compared the performance of seven different machine learning models by testing different trained and untrained test stressor scenarios. In the comparison, five models achieved an F1-score above 0.99 for the trained test scenarios. Random Forest was the only model able to attain an F1-score above 0.9 for all untrained test scenarios with the lowest being 0.980. The results suggest that it is possible to generate accurate anomaly detection to evaluate degraded client-side performance.

Read more

8/28/2024