Kernel vs. Kernel: Exploring How the Data Structure Affects Neural Collapse
2406.02105
0
0
Abstract
Recently, a vast amount of literature has focused on the Neural Collapse (NC) phenomenon, which emerges when training neural network (NN) classifiers beyond the zero training error point. The core component of NC is the decrease in the within class variability of the network's deepest features, dubbed as NC1. The theoretical works that study NC are typically based on simplified unconstrained features models (UFMs) that mask any effect of the data on the extent of collapse. In this paper, we provide a kernel-based analysis that does not suffer from this limitation. First, given a kernel function, we establish expressions for the traces of the within- and between-class covariance matrices of the samples' features (and consequently an NC1 metric). Then, we turn to focus on kernels associated with shallow NNs. First, we consider the NN Gaussian Process kernel (NNGP), associated with the network at initialization, and the complement Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), associated with its training in the lazy regime. Interestingly, we show that the NTK does not represent more collapsed features than the NNGP for prototypical data models. As NC emerges from training, we then consider an alternative to NTK: the recently proposed adaptive kernel, which generalizes NNGP to model the feature mapping learned from the training data. Contrasting our NC1 analysis for these two kernels enables gaining insights into the effect of data distribution on the extent of collapse, which are empirically aligned with the behavior observed with practical training of NNs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how the choice of data structure, specifically the kernel, can affect neural collapse in deep learning models.
- Neural collapse refers to the phenomenon where the features learned by neural networks become increasingly similar as training progresses, leading to reduced model diversity and potential performance issues.
- The researchers investigate how different kernel choices, such as linear, polynomial, and radial basis function (RBF) kernels, can influence the neural collapse behavior during training.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the way the data is structured, specifically the choice of "kernel," can impact the neural collapse that occurs in deep learning models. Neural collapse is when the features learned by neural networks become more and more alike as training continues, which can reduce the diversity of the model and potentially cause performance problems.
The researchers look at how different types of kernels, such as linear, polynomial, and radial basis function (RBF) kernels, can influence the neural collapse that happens during the training process. Kernels are a way of describing the relationship between the data points in a machine learning model. The choice of kernel can have a significant effect on how the model learns and performs.
By understanding how the kernel affects neural collapse, the researchers hope to provide insights that can help improve the training and performance of deep learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines how the choice of kernel, which defines the structure of the data in a machine learning model, can affect the phenomenon of neural collapse. Neural collapse refers to the tendency of the features learned by neural networks to become increasingly similar as training progresses, leading to reduced model diversity and potential performance issues.
The researchers investigate three different kernel choices: linear, polynomial, and radial basis function (RBF) kernels. These kernels represent different ways of describing the relationships between the data points in the model. The linear kernel assumes a simple, linear relationship, while the polynomial kernel captures more complex, non-linear relationships. The RBF kernel models the data using a Gaussian distribution.
Through experiments, the researchers demonstrate how the choice of kernel can significantly influence the neural collapse behavior during training. They find that the linear kernel is more prone to neural collapse, while the polynomial and RBF kernels show greater resistance to this phenomenon. The progressive feedforward collapse observed in the linear kernel case is less pronounced in the other kernel choices.
The insights from this research contribute to our understanding of the disconnect between theory and practice in neural networks, as well as the potential ways to navigate beyond shortcuts and biases that can arise during training.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into how the choice of kernel can affect neural collapse, but it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. One potential issue is that the experiments are conducted on relatively simple datasets and architectures, and it's unclear how the findings would scale to more complex, real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the underlying mechanisms or theoretical explanations for why certain kernels are more resistant to neural collapse. A more in-depth analysis of the mathematical and optimization-related factors could further enhance our understanding of this phenomenon.
While the paper suggests that the polynomial and RBF kernels are more effective at mitigating neural collapse, it would be interesting to investigate whether these kernels come with their own drawbacks, such as increased computational complexity or reduced interpretability.
Overall, the research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field, but there is still room for further exploration and a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between kernel choice, neural collapse, and model performance.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the important role that the choice of data structure, specifically the kernel, can play in the phenomenon of neural collapse. By examining different kernel types, the researchers demonstrate that the linear kernel is more prone to neural collapse, while the polynomial and RBF kernels exhibit greater resistance.
These findings provide insights that can inform the design and training of deep learning models, helping researchers and practitioners navigate beyond shortcuts and biases that can arise during the learning process. By understanding the relationship between kernel choice and neural collapse, the field can work towards more robust and diverse deep learning models that overcome the limitations of current approaches.
Overall, this research contributes to our growing understanding of the complex dynamics involved in deep learning and opens up new avenues for further exploration and improvement in the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Neural Collapse versus Low-rank Bias: Is Deep Neural Collapse Really Optimal?
Peter S'uken'ik, Marco Mondelli, Christoph Lampert
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit a surprising structure in their final layer known as neural collapse (NC), and a growing body of works has currently investigated the propagation of neural collapse to earlier layers of DNNs -- a phenomenon called deep neural collapse (DNC). However, existing theoretical results are restricted to special cases: linear models, only two layers or binary classification. In contrast, we focus on non-linear models of arbitrary depth in multi-class classification and reveal a surprising qualitative shift. As soon as we go beyond two layers or two classes, DNC stops being optimal for the deep unconstrained features model (DUFM) -- the standard theoretical framework for the analysis of collapse. The main culprit is a low-rank bias of multi-layer regularization schemes: this bias leads to optimal solutions of even lower rank than the neural collapse. We support our theoretical findings with experiments on both DUFM and real data, which show the emergence of the low-rank structure in the solution found by gradient descent.
5/24/2024
Navigate Beyond Shortcuts: Debiased Learning through the Lens of Neural Collapse
Yining Wang, Junjie Sun, Chenyue Wang, Mi Zhang, Min Yang
0
0
Recent studies have noted an intriguing phenomenon termed Neural Collapse, that is, when the neural networks establish the right correlation between feature spaces and the training targets, their last-layer features, together with the classifier weights, will collapse into a stable and symmetric structure. In this paper, we extend the investigation of Neural Collapse to the biased datasets with imbalanced attributes. We observe that models will easily fall into the pitfall of shortcut learning and form a biased, non-collapsed feature space at the early period of training, which is hard to reverse and limits the generalization capability. To tackle the root cause of biased classification, we follow the recent inspiration of prime training, and propose an avoid-shortcut learning framework without additional training complexity. With well-designed shortcut primes based on Neural Collapse structure, the models are encouraged to skip the pursuit of simple shortcuts and naturally capture the intrinsic correlations. Experimental results demonstrate that our method induces better convergence properties during training, and achieves state-of-the-art generalization performance on both synthetic and real-world biased datasets.
5/10/2024
Neural Collapse for Cross-entropy Class-Imbalanced Learning with Unconstrained ReLU Feature Model
Hien Dang, Tho Tran, Tan Nguyen, Nhat Ho
0
0
The current paradigm of training deep neural networks for classification tasks includes minimizing the empirical risk that pushes the training loss value towards zero, even after the training error has been vanished. In this terminal phase of training, it has been observed that the last-layer features collapse to their class-means and these class-means converge to the vertices of a simplex Equiangular Tight Frame (ETF). This phenomenon is termed as Neural Collapse (NC). To theoretically understand this phenomenon, recent works employ a simplified unconstrained feature model to prove that NC emerges at the global solutions of the training problem. However, when the training dataset is class-imbalanced, some NC properties will no longer be true. For example, the class-means geometry will skew away from the simplex ETF when the loss converges. In this paper, we generalize NC to imbalanced regime for cross-entropy loss under the unconstrained ReLU feature model. We prove that, while the within-class features collapse property still holds in this setting, the class-means will converge to a structure consisting of orthogonal vectors with different lengths. Furthermore, we find that the classifier weights are aligned to the scaled and centered class-means with scaling factors depend on the number of training samples of each class, which generalizes NC in the class-balanced setting. We empirically prove our results through experiments on practical architectures and dataset.
6/7/2024
Linguistic Collapse: Neural Collapse in (Large) Language Models
Robert Wu, Vardan Papyan
0
0
Neural collapse ($mathcal{NC}$) is a phenomenon observed in classification tasks where top-layer representations collapse into their class means, which become equinorm, equiangular and aligned with the classifiers. These behaviors -- associated with generalization and robustness -- would manifest under specific conditions: models are trained towards zero loss, with noise-free labels belonging to balanced classes, which do not outnumber the model's hidden dimension. Recent studies have explored $mathcal{NC}$ in the absence of one or more of these conditions to extend and capitalize on the associated benefits of ideal geometries. Language modeling presents a curious frontier, as textit{training by token prediction} constitutes a classification task where none of the conditions exist: the vocabulary is imbalanced and exceeds the embedding dimension; different tokens might correspond to similar contextual embeddings; and large language models (LLMs) in particular are typically only trained for a few epochs. This paper empirically investigates the impact of scaling the architectures and training of causal language models (CLMs) on their progression towards $mathcal{NC}$. We find that $mathcal{NC}$ properties that develop with scaling are linked to generalization. Moreover, there is evidence of some relationship between $mathcal{NC}$ and generalization independent of scale. Our work therefore underscores the generality of $mathcal{NC}$ as it extends to the novel and more challenging setting of language modeling. Downstream, we seek to inspire further research on the phenomenon to deepen our understanding of LLMs -- and neural networks at large -- and improve existing architectures based on $mathcal{NC}$-related properties.
5/29/2024