Knowledge Accumulation in Continually Learned Representations and the Issue of Feature Forgetting

Overview

• The paper explores the problem of catastrophic forgetting in neural networks, particularly at the level of learned representations.
• It challenges the notion that representations are inherently robust against forgetting, and instead shows that forgetting can be just as catastrophic in representations as it is at the output level.
• The paper also examines how feature forgetting can slow down the incremental learning of good general representations.
• Finally, it investigates how different continual learning methods affect feature forgetting and knowledge accumulation.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks, the machine learning models that power many modern AI systems, have a tendency to "forget" what they've learned when they're trained on new information. This phenomenon, known as catastrophic forgetting, can be a major obstacle to building AI systems that can continuously learn and adapt over time.

Previous research has suggested that while neural networks may suffer from catastrophic forgetting at the output level (the final predictions they make), the underlying "representations" they learn – the patterns and features they discover in the data – are more robust and don't forget as easily. This idea, that representations are inherently resistant to forgetting, has been widely accepted.

However, this paper challenges that assumption. The researchers show that while forgetting in the representations may be small in absolute terms, when you consider how much the network has learned, the relative amount of forgetting is just as severe as at the output level. In other words, neural networks can forget a substantial portion of what they've learned, even in their representations.

This feature forgetting, as the paper calls it, is problematic because it slows down the network's ability to continuously build up a general, useful understanding of the world (a process known as knowledge accumulation).

The paper also explores how different techniques for continual learning (training neural networks on new tasks without forgetting what they've learned) can impact this balance between feature forgetting and knowledge accumulation.

Technical Explanation

The paper revisits and expands upon previous experiments that suggested representations in neural networks are more robust against forgetting than the output predictions. The researchers show that while the absolute amount of forgetting in representations may be smaller, the relative amount of forgetting (compared to how much was learned) is just as catastrophic as at the output level.

The authors illustrate this by looking at two key phenomena that affect the quality of continually learned representations: knowledge accumulation and feature forgetting. They find that even though feature forgetting may be small in absolute terms, it is still problematic because it substantially slows down the incremental learning of good general representations.

The paper then studies how different continual learning methods, such as brain-inspired approaches or example-based approaches, affect this balance between feature forgetting and knowledge accumulation.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a nuanced and rigorous analysis of the issue of catastrophic forgetting in neural network representations, challenging the prevailing narrative that representations are inherently robust against forgetting. The authors' key insight – that relative forgetting in representations can be just as severe as at the output level – is an important contribution to the field.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons why representations may exhibit this level of forgetting, nor does it explore potential solutions or mitigation strategies beyond the comparison of different continual learning methods. Further research would be needed to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving this feature forgetting and to develop more effective approaches for preserving learned representations over time.

Additionally, the experiments in the paper are focused on relatively simple benchmark tasks, and it remains to be seen how these findings would scale to more complex, real-world scenarios. Applying this analysis to larger, more diverse datasets and model architectures could yield additional insights and uncover potential limitations or edge cases.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of catastrophic forgetting in neural networks by challenging the widely held belief that representations are inherently robust against forgetting. By demonstrating that feature forgetting can be just as severe as output-level forgetting, the authors highlight an important problem that needs to be addressed in order to build continually learning AI systems.

The insights around the interplay between feature forgetting and knowledge accumulation, and how different continual learning methods impact this balance, provide a valuable foundation for future research in this area. Addressing the issue of feature forgetting will be crucial for developing neural networks that can continuously expand their knowledge and capabilities over time.