A Methodology-Oriented Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Incremental Deep Neural Networks
2405.08015
0
0
Abstract
Human being and different species of animals having the skills to gather, transferring knowledge, processing, fine-tune and generating information throughout their lifetime. The ability of learning throughout their lifespan is referred as continuous learning which is using neurocognition mechanism. Consequently, in real world computational system of incremental learning autonomous agents also needs such continuous learning mechanism which provide retrieval of information and long-term memory consolidation. However, the main challenge in artificial intelligence is that the incremental learning of the autonomous agent when new data confronted. In such scenarios, the main concern is catastrophic forgetting(CF), i.e., while learning the sequentially, neural network underfits the old data when it confronted with new data. To tackle this CF problem many numerous studied have been proposed, however it is very difficult to compare their performance due to dissimilarity in their evaluation mechanism. Here we focus on the comparison of all algorithms which are having similar type of evaluation mechanism. Here we are comparing three types of incremental learning methods: (1) Exemplar based methods, (2) Memory based methods, and (3) Network based method. In this survey paper, methodology oriented study for catastrophic forgetting in incremental deep neural network is addressed. Furthermore, it contains the mathematical overview of impact-full methods which can be help researchers to deal with CF.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a methodological study of catastrophic forgetting in incremental deep neural networks.
- Catastrophic forgetting is a common issue in continual learning, where a model forgets previously learned information when trained on new tasks.
- The authors explore various continual learning frameworks and evaluate their effectiveness in mitigating catastrophic forgetting.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can learn complex patterns from data. However, they can suffer from a problem called catastrophic forgetting, where the model forgets information it has learned previously when trained on new tasks.
This paper takes a close look at different methods, or "frameworks," that researchers have developed to help neural networks learn new information without completely forgetting what they've learned before. The authors evaluate the effectiveness of these frameworks at preventing catastrophic forgetting.
They do this by training neural networks on a series of tasks, one after the other, and measuring how well the network retains its performance on the earlier tasks as it learns the new ones. This helps them understand which frameworks work best for continual learning - that is, learning new things without completely forgetting the old.
The insights from this methodological study can inform the development of better continual learning algorithms, which is an important area of research for making AI systems more robust and adaptable. By overcoming catastrophic forgetting, we can create neural networks that can continuously expand their knowledge and skills over time, just like humans do.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines Continual Learning Frameworks for mitigating catastrophic forgetting in incremental deep neural networks. The authors evaluate the performance of several popular frameworks, including Remembering Transformer, Convergence of Continual Learning with Adaptive Methods, CORE, and Brain-Inspired Continual Learning.
The experimental setup involves training deep neural network models on a sequence of tasks, measuring the model's performance on both the current task and previously learned tasks. This allows the authors to quantify the degree of catastrophic forgetting exhibited by each continual learning framework.
The results provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches. Some frameworks are better able to retain performance on earlier tasks, while others excel at learning new information quickly. The authors also observe that the choice of continual learning method can have a significant impact on the final model's performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough, methodological comparison of several prominent continual learning frameworks. However, the authors acknowledge that their study is limited to a specific set of tasks and datasets. Additional experimentation on a wider range of scenarios would help further validate the findings and uncover potential edge cases or limitations of the frameworks.
Moreover, the paper does not delve into the underlying mechanisms and design choices that contribute to the observed performance differences. A deeper analysis of the key principles and assumptions behind each framework could yield more actionable insights for researchers and practitioners working on continual learning.
Finally, the authors do not explore the computational and memory efficiency trade-offs of the different frameworks. In real-world applications, these practical considerations can be just as important as pure performance metrics.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive, methodological study of catastrophic forgetting in incremental deep neural networks. The authors evaluate the effectiveness of several leading continual learning frameworks, providing valuable insights into their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for different learning scenarios.
The findings from this research can inform the development of more robust and adaptable AI systems, which is a crucial step towards realizing the full potential of machine learning. By overcoming catastrophic forgetting, we can create neural networks that can continuously expand their knowledge and skills, much like how humans learn and grow over time.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
Yun Luo, Zhen Yang, Fandong Meng, Yafu Li, Jie Zhou, Yue Zhang
0
0
Catastrophic forgetting (CF) is a phenomenon that occurs in machine learning when a model forgets previously learned information while acquiring new knowledge. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance, it is intriguing to investigate whether CF exists during the continual instruction tuning of LLMs. This study empirically evaluates the forgetting phenomenon in LLMs' knowledge during continual instruction tuning from the perspectives of domain knowledge, reasoning, and reading comprehension. The experiments reveal that catastrophic forgetting is generally observed in LLMs ranging from 1b to 7b parameters. Moreover, as the model scale increases, the severity of forgetting intensifies. Comparing the decoder-only model BLOOMZ with the encoder-decoder model mT0, BLOOMZ exhibits less forgetting and retains more knowledge. Interestingly, we also observe that LLMs can mitigate language biases, such as gender bias, during continual fine-tuning. Furthermore, our findings indicate that ALPACA maintains more knowledge and capacity compared to LLAMA during continual fine-tuning, suggesting that general instruction tuning can help alleviate the forgetting phenomenon in LLMs during subsequent fine-tuning processes.
4/3/2024
✨
Knowledge Accumulation in Continually Learned Representations and the Issue of Feature Forgetting
Timm Hess, Eli Verwimp, Gido M. van de Ven, Tinne Tuytelaars
0
0
Continual learning research has shown that neural networks suffer from catastrophic forgetting at the output level, but it is debated whether this is also the case at the level of learned representations. Multiple recent studies ascribe representations a certain level of innate robustness against forgetting -- that they only forget minimally in comparison with forgetting at the output level. We revisit and expand upon the experiments that revealed this difference in forgetting and illustrate the coexistence of two phenomena that affect the quality of continually learned representations: knowledge accumulation and feature forgetting. Taking both aspects into account, we show that, even though forgetting in the representation (i.e. feature forgetting) can be small in absolute terms, when measuring relative to how much was learned during a task, forgetting in the representation tends to be just as catastrophic as forgetting at the output level. Next we show that this feature forgetting is problematic as it substantially slows down the incremental learning of good general representations (i.e. knowledge accumulation). Finally, we study how feature forgetting and knowledge accumulation are affected by different types of continual learning methods.
6/26/2024
Revisiting Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Model Tuning
Hongyu Li, Liang Ding, Meng Fang, Dacheng Tao
0
0
Catastrophic Forgetting (CF) means models forgetting previously acquired knowledge when learning new data. It compromises the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) during fine-tuning, yet the underlying causes have not been thoroughly investigated. This paper takes the first step to reveal the direct link between the flatness of the model loss landscape and the extent of CF in the field of LLMs. Based on this, we introduce the sharpness-aware minimization to mitigate CF by flattening the loss landscape. Experiments on three widely-used fine-tuning datasets, spanning different model scales, demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in alleviating CF. Analyses show that we nicely complement the existing anti-forgetting strategies, further enhancing the resistance of LLMs to CF.
6/10/2024
New!The impact of model size on catastrophic forgetting in Online Continual Learning
Eunhae Lee
0
0
This study investigates the impact of model size on Online Continual Learning performance, with a focus on catastrophic forgetting. Employing ResNet architectures of varying sizes, the research examines how network depth and width affect model performance in class-incremental learning using the SplitCIFAR-10 dataset. Key findings reveal that larger models do not guarantee better Continual Learning performance; in fact, they often struggle more in adapting to new tasks, particularly in online settings. These results challenge the notion that larger models inherently mitigate catastrophic forgetting, highlighting the nuanced relationship between model size and Continual Learning efficacy. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of model scalability and its practical implications in Continual Learning scenarios.
7/2/2024