Knowledge Graphs in Practice: Characterizing their Users, Challenges, and Visualization Opportunities

Overview

• This study explores the challenges faced by practitioners when working with Knowledge Graphs (KGs) across enterprise and academic settings.
• The researchers conducted interviews with 19 KG practitioners to identify the distinct needs and pain points of different personas - KG Builders, Analysts, and Consumers.
• The findings reveal opportunities to improve KG usability through visualization design, addressing both technical and social challenges in KG implementation.

Plain English Explanation

Knowledge Graphs are powerful tools that organize information in a structured, interconnected way. However, working with Knowledge Graphs can be challenging for practitioners in various roles.

This study aimed to better understand these challenges by interviewing 19 KG experts from both enterprise and academic settings. The researchers identified three main personas among KG practitioners:

• KG Builders: Experts responsible for creating and maintaining the KG's structure and content. They would benefit from tools that help enforce data schema and quality.
• KG Analysts: Professionals who explore and analyze the KG to derive insights. They need customizable query builders that provide immediate feedback on their queries.
• KG Consumers: End-users who rely on the KG to inform their decision-making. They often struggle to make sense of complex node-link diagrams and would benefit from more tailored, domain-specific visualizations.

The study also found that effective KG implementation requires addressing both technical and social challenges, which current tools and workflows often fail to address. To improve KG usability, the researchers suggest exploring new visualization approaches, such as:

• Knowledge cards that balance digestibility and discoverability
• Timeline views to track temporal changes in the KG
• Interfaces that support organic, exploratory discovery
• Semantic explanations for AI and machine learning predictions powered by the KG

By focusing on the unique needs of different KG personas, this research aims to make these powerful knowledge management tools more accessible and effective across a variety of use cases.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 KG practitioners, including data scientists, knowledge engineers, and domain experts, who work with KGs in both enterprise and academic settings. The goal was to understand the challenges they face when creating, exploring, and analyzing KGs.

Through the analysis of the interview data, the researchers identified three main personas among KG practitioners:

1. KG Builders: These experts are responsible for the technical implementation and maintenance of the KG, including tasks like schema design, data ingestion, and quality control. They would benefit from tools that help enforce data schema and ensure data quality.

2. KG Analysts: These professionals use KGs to derive insights, often through complex querying and analysis. They need customizable query builders that provide immediate feedback on their queries and interim results, allowing them to iterate more effectively.

3. KG Consumers: These end-users rely on the KG to inform their decision-making, but often struggle to make sense of the complex node-link diagrams typically used to visualize KGs. They would benefit from more tailored, domain-specific visualizations that promote KG adoption and comprehension.

The researchers also found that effective KG implementation requires addressing both technical and social challenges, which current tools, technologies, and collaborative workflows often fail to address. For example, KG Builders may need support for organic, exploratory discovery to better understand their data, while KG Consumers may benefit from hierarchical, tree-structured visualizations to navigate the knowledge more intuitively.

Based on these insights, the researchers distill several visualization research directions to improve KG usability, including:

• Knowledge cards that balance digestibility and discoverability
• Timeline views to track temporal changes in the KG
• Interfaces that support organic, exploratory discovery
• Semantic explanations for AI and machine learning predictions powered by the KG

By addressing the unique needs of different KG personas, this research aims to accelerate medical knowledge discovery and improve the overall effectiveness of KGs across a variety of use cases.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the real-world challenges faced by KG practitioners, which can help guide future research and development efforts. By identifying distinct personas and their specific needs, the researchers offer a nuanced understanding of KG usability that goes beyond generic user requirements.

However, the study is limited by its relatively small sample size of 19 interviews, which may not fully capture the breadth of experiences and perspectives across the KG practitioner community. Additionally, the researchers did not delve into the potential cultural or organizational barriers that could hinder the adoption and effective use of KGs, which may be an important consideration for enterprise settings.

Furthermore, while the suggested visualization research directions are promising, the study does not provide a detailed roadmap or evaluation of how these solutions would be implemented and their potential impact. More empirical research may be needed to validate the effectiveness of these approaches in real-world KG applications.

Overall, this study serves as a valuable starting point for understanding the challenges faced by KG practitioners and identifying opportunities to improve KG usability through thoughtful visualization design. Continued research and collaboration between academics, developers, and end-users will be crucial to further advancing the field of knowledge graph management and driving its wider adoption.

Conclusion

This study provides critical insights into the challenges experienced by Knowledge Graph (KG) practitioners in both enterprise and academic settings. By interviewing 19 experts, the researchers identified three distinct personas - KG Builders, Analysts, and Consumers - each with their own unique needs and pain points.

The findings reveal that effective KG implementation requires addressing both technical and social challenges, which current tools and workflows often fail to address. To improve KG usability, the researchers suggest exploring new visualization approaches, such as knowledge cards, timeline views, and domain-specific interfaces that better support the diverse needs of KG practitioners.

By focusing on the unique requirements of different KG personas, this research aims to make these powerful knowledge management tools more accessible and effective across a variety of use cases, ultimately accelerating knowledge discovery and decision-making processes.