LABCAT: Locally adaptive Bayesian optimization using principal-component-aligned trust regions

Read original: arXiv:2311.11328 - Published 6/18/2024 by E. Visser, C. E. van Daalen, J. C. Schoeman

🛠️

Overview

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular method for optimizing expensive black-box functions
BO has several well-documented shortcomings, including computational slowdown, poor suitability for non-stationary or ill-conditioned objective functions, and poor convergence characteristics
To address these issues, the authors propose the LABCAT algorithm, which extends trust-region-based BO with additional techniques

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a technique used to find the best settings for complex systems or processes that are expensive to test or evaluate. However, BO has some limitations - it can become slow when run for a long time, it doesn't work well with certain types of problems, and it may not converge to the best solution.

To try to fix these issues, the researchers developed a new algorithm called LABCAT. LABCAT builds on the idea of trust regions, which are essentially smaller areas around the current best solution that the algorithm focuses on searching. LABCAT adds two new techniques to this:

Rotation: It aligns the trust region with the most important factors, as identified by analyzing the data collected so far.
Adaptive Rescaling: It automatically adjusts the size of the trust region based on how the objective function behaves locally.

The authors tested LABCAT on a variety of synthetic test problems as well as standard benchmarking software, and found that it outperformed several other state-of-the-art BO and black-box optimization algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose the LABCAT (Local Adaptive Bayesian Optimization with Coordinate Alignment and Trust regions) algorithm to address the limitations of standard BO approaches. LABCAT extends trust-region-based BO by adding two key innovations:

Coordinate Alignment: LABCAT rotates the trust region to align it with the weighted principal components of the local Gaussian process (GP) surrogate model. This helps the algorithm focus its search along the most relevant dimensions.
Adaptive Rescaling: LABCAT uses the length-scales of the local GP model with automatic relevance determination to dynamically rescale the size of the trust region. This allows the algorithm to better adapt to the local landscape of the objective function.

The authors evaluate LABCAT through extensive numerical experiments using a set of synthetic test functions as well as the well-known COCO benchmarking software. They compare LABCAT to several state-of-the-art BO algorithms, including Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimization, Latent Space Bayesian Optimization with Latent Data Augmentation, and Minimizing UCB: A Better Local Search Strategy for Local Bayesian Optimization, as well as other black-box optimization methods. The results demonstrate that LABCAT outperforms these alternatives.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that LABCAT, like other BO approaches, may still struggle with certain types of objective functions, such as those that are highly non-stationary or ill-conditioned. Additionally, the computational overhead of the coordinate alignment and adaptive rescaling steps may limit the scalability of LABCAT to very high-dimensional problems.

While the experimental results are promising, it would be valuable to see how LABCAT performs on a wider range of real-world optimization problems, beyond the synthetic test functions and COCO benchmarks presented in the paper. Evaluating the algorithm's robustness and generalizability to diverse application domains would strengthen the claims about its effectiveness.

Furthermore, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the failure modes or edge cases of LABCAT. Understanding the algorithm's limitations and potential pitfalls would help users make informed decisions about when to apply it versus alternative optimization techniques.

Conclusion

The LABCAT algorithm proposed in this paper represents an interesting advance in Bayesian optimization, addressing several well-known shortcomings of standard BO approaches. By incorporating local strategies like trust regions, coordinate alignment, and adaptive rescaling, LABCAT demonstrates improved performance on a variety of benchmark problems.

The authors' work highlights the potential benefits of hybridizing global exploration and local exploitation techniques in black-box optimization. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of BO, techniques like LABCAT may help expand the range of problems that can be effectively solved using these powerful optimization methods.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

LABCAT: Locally adaptive Bayesian optimization using principal-component-aligned trust regions

E. Visser, C. E. van Daalen, J. C. Schoeman

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular method for optimizing expensive black-box functions. BO has several well-documented shortcomings, including computational slowdown with longer optimization runs, poor suitability for non-stationary or ill-conditioned objective functions, and poor convergence characteristics. Several algorithms have been proposed that incorporate local strategies, such as trust regions, into BO to mitigate these limitations; however, none address all of them satisfactorily. To address these shortcomings, we propose the LABCAT algorithm, which extends trust-region-based BO by adding a rotation aligning the trust region with the weighted principal components and an adaptive rescaling strategy based on the length-scales of a local Gaussian process surrogate model with automatic relevance determination. Through extensive numerical experiments using a set of synthetic test functions and the well-known COCO benchmarking software, we show that the LABCAT algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art BO and other black-box optimization algorithms.

6/18/2024

🛠️

Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimization

Wenjie Xu, Wenbin Wang, Yuning Jiang, Bratislav Svetozarevic, Colin N. Jones

We study the problem of preferential Bayesian optimization (BO), where we aim to optimize a black-box function with only preference feedback over a pair of candidate solutions. Inspired by the likelihood ratio idea, we construct a confidence set of the black-box function using only the preference feedback. An optimistic algorithm with an efficient computational method is then developed to solve the problem, which enjoys an information-theoretic bound on the total cumulative regret, a first-of-its-kind for preferential BO. This bound further allows us to design a scheme to report an estimated best solution, with a guaranteed convergence rate. Experimental results on sampled instances from Gaussian processes, standard test functions, and a thermal comfort optimization problem all show that our method stably achieves better or competitive performance as compared to the existing state-of-the-art heuristics, which, however, do not have theoretical guarantees on regret bounds or convergence.

5/30/2024

🛠️

Joint Composite Latent Space Bayesian Optimization

Natalie Maus, Zhiyuan Jerry Lin, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy

Bayesian Optimization (BO) is a technique for sample-efficient black-box optimization that employs probabilistic models to identify promising input locations for evaluation. When dealing with composite-structured functions, such as f=g o h, evaluating a specific location x yields observations of both the final outcome f(x) = g(h(x)) as well as the intermediate output(s) h(x). Previous research has shown that integrating information from these intermediate outputs can enhance BO performance substantially. However, existing methods struggle if the outputs h(x) are high-dimensional. Many relevant problems fall into this setting, including in the context of generative AI, molecular design, or robotics. To effectively tackle these challenges, we introduce Joint Composite Latent Space Bayesian Optimization (JoCo), a novel framework that jointly trains neural network encoders and probabilistic models to adaptively compress high-dimensional input and output spaces into manageable latent representations. This enables viable BO on these compressed representations, allowing JoCo to outperform other state-of-the-art methods in high-dimensional BO on a wide variety of simulated and real-world problems.

7/11/2024

🛠️

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

6/21/2024