Language Models as Models of Language

Read original: arXiv:2408.07144 - Published 8/15/2024 by Raphael Milli`ere
Total Score

0

Language Models as Models of Language

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Provides a brief history of statistical language modeling, a key concept in natural language processing and the development of language models.
  • Explores how modern language models can be viewed as models of language itself, rather than just tools for language tasks.
  • Discusses the implications and potential insights that can be gained by considering language models in this way.

Plain English Explanation

Language models are a fundamental component of modern natural language processing (NLP) systems. These models are trained on vast amounts of text data to learn the patterns and structures of human language. By doing so, they can generate human-like text, translate between languages, answer questions, and perform a variety of other language-related tasks.

A brief history of statistical language modelling explains how language modeling has evolved over time, from early n-gram models to the large, transformer-based models used today. These models have become increasingly sophisticated, able to capture more nuanced and contextual aspects of language.

But the paper argues that we should go beyond just viewing language models as tools for completing NLP tasks. Instead, we should consider them as

models of language itself
- representations of the underlying structure and patterns of human language. By taking this perspective, we can gain new insights into the nature of language and how it is processed by the human mind.

This shift in perspective could lead to a deeper understanding of language and potentially unlock new applications for language models beyond the current state of the art.

Technical Explanation

The paper traces the history of statistical language modeling, starting with early n-gram models that simply looked at the probability of words occurring in sequence. Over time, these models became more sophisticated, incorporating more contextual information and moving towards neural network-based architectures.

The advent of large transformer-based models like GPT and BERT has greatly expanded the capabilities of language models. These models can capture complex semantic and syntactic relationships, going beyond just predicting the next word in a sequence.

The authors argue that we should view these modern language models not just as tools, but as representations of the underlying structure of language itself. By understanding language models as models of language, we can gain insights into how humans process and understand language.

This perspective shift could lead to new research directions and applications for language models. For example, analyzing the internal representations of language models could shed light on the cognitive processes involved in language understanding. Additionally, using language models as testbeds for linguistic theories could help validate or refine those theories.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for considering language models as models of language, rather than just as tools for language tasks. This shift in perspective could indeed open up new avenues of research and unlock novel applications for these powerful models.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential limitations or challenges of this approach. For example, it does not address the fact that language models are trained on imperfect, biased data, which could lead to biases or inaccuracies in their representations of language. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential difficulties in interpreting the complex internal representations of these models and mapping them to cognitive processes.

Further research and discussion will be needed to fully explore the implications and potential pitfalls of this new perspective on language models. Nonetheless, the paper provides a thought-provoking starting point for rethinking the role of these models in the field of natural language processing.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling argument for considering language models as models of language itself, rather than just as tools for completing NLP tasks. By shifting our perspective in this way, we may uncover new insights into the nature of human language and unlock novel applications for these powerful models.

The paper traces the historical development of statistical language modeling, highlighting how these models have become increasingly sophisticated over time. It then makes the case that modern language models, with their ability to capture complex semantic and syntactic relationships, can be viewed as representations of the underlying structure of language.

This shift in perspective could lead to new research directions, such as analyzing the internal representations of language models to better understand the cognitive processes involved in language understanding. It could also help validate or refine linguistic theories by using language models as testbeds.

While the paper does not address all the potential limitations and challenges of this approach, it provides a thought-provoking starting point for rethinking the role of language models in the field of natural language processing. As the capabilities of these models continue to evolve, this new perspective may prove invaluable in unlocking their full potential.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Language Models as Models of Language
Total Score

0

Language Models as Models of Language

Raphael Milli`ere

This chapter critically examines the potential contributions of modern language models to theoretical linguistics. Despite their focus on engineering goals, these models' ability to acquire sophisticated linguistic knowledge from mere exposure to data warrants a careful reassessment of their relevance to linguistic theory. I review a growing body of empirical evidence suggesting that language models can learn hierarchical syntactic structure and exhibit sensitivity to various linguistic phenomena, even when trained on developmentally plausible amounts of data. While the competence/performance distinction has been invoked to dismiss the relevance of such models to linguistic theory, I argue that this assessment may be premature. By carefully controlling learning conditions and making use of causal intervention methods, experiments with language models can potentially constrain hypotheses about language acquisition and competence. I conclude that closer collaboration between theoretical linguists and computational researchers could yield valuable insights, particularly in advancing debates about linguistic nativism.

Read more

8/15/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Modelling Language

Jumbly Grindrod

This paper argues that large language models have a valuable scientific role to play in serving as scientific models of a language. Linguistic study should not only be concerned with the cognitive processes behind linguistic competence, but also with language understood as an external, social entity. Once this is recognized, the value of large language models as scientific models becomes clear. This paper defends this position against a number of arguments to the effect that language models provide no linguistic insight. It also draws upon recent work in philosophy of science to show how large language models could serve as scientific models.

Read more

4/16/2024

History, Development, and Principles of Large Language Models-An Introductory Survey
Total Score

0

History, Development, and Principles of Large Language Models-An Introductory Survey

Zhibo Chu, Shiwen Ni, Zichong Wang, Xi Feng, Min Yang, Wenbin Zhang

Language models serve as a cornerstone in natural language processing (NLP), utilizing mathematical methods to generalize language laws and knowledge for prediction and generation. Over extensive research spanning decades, language modeling has progressed from initial statistical language models (SLMs) to the contemporary landscape of large language models (LLMs). Notably, the swift evolution of LLMs has reached the ability to process, understand, and generate human-level text. Nevertheless, despite the significant advantages that LLMs offer in improving both work and personal lives, the limited understanding among general practitioners about the background and principles of these models hampers their full potential. Notably, most LLMs reviews focus on specific aspects and utilize specialized language, posing a challenge for practitioners lacking relevant background knowledge. In light of this, this survey aims to present a comprehensible overview of LLMs to assist a broader audience. It strives to facilitate a comprehensive understanding by exploring the historical background of language models and tracing their evolution over time. The survey further investigates the factors influencing the development of LLMs, emphasizing key contributions. Additionally, it concentrates on elucidating the underlying principles of LLMs, equipping audiences with essential theoretical knowledge. The survey also highlights the limitations of existing work and points out promising future directions.

Read more

6/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

A Philosophical Introduction to Language Models - Part II: The Way Forward

Raphael Milli`ere, Cameron Buckner

In this paper, the second of two companion pieces, we explore novel philosophical questions raised by recent progress in large language models (LLMs) that go beyond the classical debates covered in the first part. We focus particularly on issues related to interpretability, examining evidence from causal intervention methods about the nature of LLMs' internal representations and computations. We also discuss the implications of multimodal and modular extensions of LLMs, recent debates about whether such systems may meet minimal criteria for consciousness, and concerns about secrecy and reproducibility in LLM research. Finally, we discuss whether LLM-like systems may be relevant to modeling aspects of human cognition, if their architectural characteristics and learning scenario are adequately constrained.

Read more

5/7/2024