Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough?

2403.17661

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/16/2024 by Aleksandra Edwards, Jose Camacho-Collados
Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough?

Abstract

Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. An advantage of these models over more standard approaches based on fine-tuning is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts), which helps them generalise better to different tasks and domains without the need for specific training data. This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances. However, existing research is limited in scale and lacks understanding of how text generation models combined with prompting techniques compare to more established methods for text classification such as fine-tuning masked language models. In this paper, we address this research gap by performing a large-scale evaluation study for 16 text classification datasets covering binary, multiclass, and multilabel problems. In particular, we compare zero- and few-shot approaches of large language models to fine-tuning smaller language models. We also analyse the results by prompt, classification type, domain, and number of labels. In general, the results show how fine-tuning smaller and more efficient language models can still outperform few-shot approaches of larger language models, which have room for improvement when it comes to text classification.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the ability of large language models to perform text classification tasks without additional fine-tuning, a process known as "in-context learning."
  • The researchers investigate whether in-context learning is sufficient for text classification or if additional supervised training is necessary to achieve good performance.
  • The paper presents experiments comparing the performance of language models on text classification tasks with and without fine-tuning, as well as analyses on the factors that contribute to the models' abilities.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, have shown impressive capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. These models can be applied to a wide range of tasks, including text classification, where the goal is to assign a label or category to a piece of text.

One approach to using these language models for text classification is "in-context learning." This means the model is given a prompt or example that demonstrates the task, and it then tries to classify new text based on that context, without any additional training or fine-tuning of the model. This is an appealing approach because it doesn't require the time and resources needed for fine-tuning the model on a specific dataset.

However, the researchers in this paper wanted to investigate whether in-context learning is sufficient for accurate text classification, or if additional supervised training is still necessary to achieve good performance. They conducted experiments to compare the classification accuracy of language models with and without fine-tuning on various text classification tasks.

The results suggest that while in-context learning can be effective for some tasks, it may not be enough to achieve the best performance, especially on more complex or domain-specific classification problems. The researchers found that providing the models with additional supervised training data and fine-tuning can significantly improve their text classification capabilities.

This work highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of in-context learning and the potential benefits of incorporating supervised training, even for powerful language models. It suggests that a combination of in-context learning and fine-tuning may be the most effective approach for using large language models in practical text classification applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a systematic study of the text classification performance of large language models, exploring the question of whether in-context learning is sufficient or if additional supervised training is necessary.

The researchers conducted experiments using several popular language models, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on a diverse set of text classification tasks. They compared the models' performance in two settings: 1) in-context learning, where the models were given a prompt or example to guide the classification, and 2) fine-tuning, where the models were trained on labeled data specific to the classification task.

The results showed that in-context learning can be effective for some text classification tasks, but the performance often fell short of what could be achieved with fine-tuning. The researchers found that the complexity of the task, as well as the linguistic and domain-specific knowledge required, were key factors in determining whether in-context learning was sufficient.

For example, the language models performed well on relatively simple tasks, such as classifying movie reviews as positive or negative. However, on more complex tasks, such as classifying legal documents or scientific papers, the models exhibited significantly lower accuracy without the benefit of fine-tuning on task-specific data.

The paper also investigates the factors that contribute to the models' performance, such as the quality and quantity of the in-context examples, the model's architecture, and the inherent difficulty of the classification task. The researchers found that providing high-quality in-context examples and leveraging the models' general language understanding capabilities can improve in-context learning, but there are still limitations to this approach.

Overall, the findings suggest that while in-context learning can be a powerful and efficient way to use large language models for text classification, it may not be enough to achieve the best possible performance, especially on more complex or domain-specific tasks. The researchers conclude that a combination of in-context learning and fine-tuning on task-specific data may be the most effective approach for practical text classification applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable empirical investigation into the capabilities and limitations of in-context learning for text classification using large language models. The researchers have carefully designed their experiments to cover a diverse range of classification tasks and models, offering a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence the performance of in-context learning.

One strength of the paper is its nuanced approach to the topic, acknowledging that in-context learning can be effective for some tasks while recognizing the need for additional supervised training in more complex scenarios. This aligns with the growing body of research on the strengths and weaknesses of large language models, which suggests that they excel at general language understanding but may still require task-specific fine-tuning to achieve optimal performance.

However, the paper could have explored the potential underlying reasons for the performance gap between in-context learning and fine-tuning in more depth. For example, it would be interesting to see an analysis of the types of linguistic and world knowledge that the models are able to leverage from the in-context examples, and where this knowledge falls short in capturing the complexities of certain classification tasks.

Additionally, the paper could have discussed the potential implications of its findings for the practical deployment of large language models in real-world text classification applications. It would be valuable to understand the trade-offs between the efficiency of in-context learning and the potential performance gains from fine-tuning, as well as the factors that organizations should consider when choosing the appropriate approach for their specific needs.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of in-context learning and its limitations, providing a solid foundation for further research and practical applications of large language models in text classification and beyond.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the ability of large language models to perform text classification tasks through in-context learning, where the models are given a prompt or example to guide the classification, without any additional fine-tuning. The researchers conducted experiments comparing the classification performance of models with and without fine-tuning on a variety of text classification tasks.

The results suggest that while in-context learning can be effective for some tasks, it may not be sufficient to achieve the best possible performance, especially on more complex or domain-specific classification problems. The researchers found that providing the models with additional supervised training data and fine-tuning can significantly improve their text classification capabilities.

This work highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of in-context learning and the potential benefits of incorporating supervised training, even for powerful language models. It suggests that a combination of in-context learning and fine-tuning may be the most effective approach for using large language models in practical text classification applications.

The findings of this paper contribute to the growing understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of large language models, and offer insights that can inform the development and deployment of these models in real-world scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks

Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks

Anwoy Chatterjee, Eshaan Tanwar, Subhabrata Dutta, Tanmoy Chakraborty

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed NLP with their remarkable In-context Learning (ICL) capabilities. Automated assistants based on LLMs are gaining popularity; however, adapting them to novel tasks is still challenging. While colossal models excel in zero-shot performance, their computational demands limit widespread use, and smaller language models struggle without context. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize from labeled examples of predefined tasks to novel tasks. Drawing inspiration from biological neurons and the mechanistic interpretation of the Transformer architecture, we explore the potential for information sharing across tasks. We design a cross-task prompting setup with three LLMs and show that LLMs achieve significant performance improvements despite no examples from the target task in the context. Cross-task prompting leads to a remarkable performance boost of 107% for LLaMA-2 7B, 18.6% for LLaMA-2 13B, and 3.2% for GPT 3.5 on average over zero-shot prompting, and performs comparable to standard in-context learning. The effectiveness of generating pseudo-labels for in-task examples is demonstrated, and our analyses reveal a strong correlation between the effect of cross-task examples and model activation similarities in source and target input tokens. This paper offers a first-of-its-kind exploration of LLMs' ability to solve novel tasks based on contextual signals from different task examples.

Read more

6/13/2024

Fine-Tuned 'Small' LLMs (Still) Significantly Outperform Zero-Shot Generative AI Models in Text Classification

Fine-Tuned 'Small' LLMs (Still) Significantly Outperform Zero-Shot Generative AI Models in Text Classification

Martin Juan Jos'e Bucher, Marco Martini

YC

0

Reddit

0

Generative AI offers a simple, prompt-based alternative to fine-tuning smaller BERT-style LLMs for text classification tasks. This promises to eliminate the need for manually labeled training data and task-specific model training. However, it remains an open question whether tools like ChatGPT can deliver on this promise. In this paper, we show that smaller, fine-tuned LLMs (still) consistently and significantly outperform larger, zero-shot prompted models in text classification. We compare three major generative AI models (ChatGPT with GPT-3.5/GPT-4 and Claude Opus) with several fine-tuned LLMs across a diverse set of classification tasks (sentiment, approval/disapproval, emotions, party positions) and text categories (news, tweets, speeches). We find that fine-tuning with application-specific training data achieves superior performance in all cases. To make this approach more accessible to a broader audience, we provide an easy-to-use toolkit alongside this paper. Our toolkit, accompanied by non-technical step-by-step guidance, enables users to select and fine-tune BERT-like LLMs for any classification task with minimal technical and computational effort.

Read more

6/14/2024

ZeroDL: Zero-shot Distribution Learning for Text Clustering via Large Language Models

ZeroDL: Zero-shot Distribution Learning for Text Clustering via Large Language Models

Hwiyeol Jo, Hyunwoo Lee, Taiwoo Park

YC

0

Reddit

0

The recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have brought significant progress in solving NLP tasks. Notably, in-context learning (ICL) is the key enabling mechanism for LLMs to understand specific tasks and grasping nuances. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective method to contextualize a task toward a specific LLM, by (1) observing how a given LLM describes (all or a part of) target datasets, i.e., open-ended zero-shot inference, and (2) aggregating the open-ended inference results by the LLM, and (3) finally incorporate the aggregated meta-information for the actual task. We show the effectiveness of this approach in text clustering tasks, and also highlight the importance of the contextualization through examples of the above procedure.

Read more

6/21/2024

💬

A Zero-shot and Few-shot Study of Instruction-Finetuned Large Language Models Applied to Clinical and Biomedical Tasks

Yanis Labrak, Mickael Rouvier, Richard Dufour

YC

0

Reddit

0

We evaluate four state-of-the-art instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) -- ChatGPT, Flan-T5 UL2, Tk-Instruct, and Alpaca -- on a set of 13 real-world clinical and biomedical natural language processing (NLP) tasks in English, such as named-entity recognition (NER), question-answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), etc. Our overall results demonstrate that the evaluated LLMs begin to approach performance of state-of-the-art models in zero- and few-shot scenarios for most tasks, and particularly well for the QA task, even though they have never seen examples from these tasks before. However, we observed that the classification and RE tasks perform below what can be achieved with a specifically trained model for the medical field, such as PubMedBERT. Finally, we noted that no LLM outperforms all the others on all the studied tasks, with some models being better suited for certain tasks than others.

Read more

6/11/2024