Large Language Models and Thematic Analysis: Human-AI Synergy in Researching Hate Speech on Social Media
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for qualitative analysis in the humanities and social sciences.
- The study focuses on using GPT-4 to perform thematic analysis on a dataset about the representation of Roma migrants in Sweden during 2016.
- The goal is to understand the potential of combining human intelligence with AI's scalability and efficiency in qualitative research.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers wanted to explore how Large Language Models could be used for qualitative analysis in fields like the humanities and social sciences. They tested this by using GPT-4, a powerful language model, to perform a type of qualitative analysis called thematic analysis on a dataset about how Swedish media represented Roma migrants in 2016.
The researchers were interested in seeing if they could combine the strengths of human intelligence, like nuanced understanding, with the speed and scalability of AI tools for qualitative research. They wanted to explore the benefits and limitations of using LLMs for this type of work in fields that rely heavily on close, contextual analysis of text and data.
Technical Explanation
The study used a dataset about the representation of Roma migrants in Swedish media during 2016, which had been previously analyzed by other researchers. The researchers fed this dataset into GPT-4 and asked it to perform thematic analysis, a common qualitative method for identifying patterns and themes in text.
The researchers then compared the themes and insights generated by GPT-4 to the findings from the original human-led analysis. This allowed them to assess the potential of LLMs to augment or even partially automate certain qualitative research tasks, while also identifying the limitations and areas where human expertise is still crucial.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that while LLMs like GPT-4 show promise for enhancing qualitative research, there are still significant challenges and limitations to their use in the humanities and social sciences. For example, the models may struggle to fully capture nuanced, contextual meanings and may introduce biases based on their training data.
Additionally, the paper suggests that using LLMs for tasks like thematic analysis should be viewed as a collaborative process, where the human researcher maintains oversight and ultimately decides how to interpret the model's outputs. Further research is needed to fully understand the best practices and appropriate use cases for LLMs in qualitative inquiry.
Conclusion
This study represents an important step in exploring the potential of Large Language Models to augment qualitative research in the humanities and social sciences. While the results are promising, the paper highlights the need for careful consideration of the limitations and continued human involvement in the research process. As AI technology advances, finding the right balance between human and machine intelligence will be crucial for these fields.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Large Language Models and Thematic Analysis: Human-AI Synergy in Researching Hate Speech on Social Media
Petre Breazu, Miriam Schirmer, Songbo Hu, Napoleon Kastos
In the dynamic field of artificial intelligence (AI), the development and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for text analysis are of significant academic interest. Despite the promising capabilities of various LLMs in conducting qualitative analysis, their use in the humanities and social sciences has not been thoroughly examined. This article contributes to the emerging literature on LLMs in qualitative analysis by documenting an experimental study involving GPT-4. The study focuses on performing thematic analysis (TA) using a YouTube dataset derived from an EU-funded project, which was previously analyzed by other researchers. This dataset is about the representation of Roma migrants in Sweden during 2016, a period marked by the aftermath of the 2015 refugee crisis and preceding the Swedish national elections in 2017. Our study seeks to understand the potential of combining human intelligence with AI's scalability and efficiency, examining the advantages and limitations of employing LLMs in qualitative research within the humanities and social sciences. Additionally, we discuss future directions for applying LLMs in these fields.
Read more8/12/2024
📉
0
Automating Thematic Analysis: How LLMs Analyse Controversial Topics
Awais Hameed Khan, Hiruni Kegalle, Rhea D'Silva, Ned Watt, Daniel Whelan-Shamy, Lida Ghahremanlou, Liam Magee
Large Language Models (LLMs) are promising analytical tools. They can augment human epistemic, cognitive and reasoning abilities, and support 'sensemaking', making sense of a complex environment or subject by analysing large volumes of data with a sensitivity to context and nuance absent in earlier text processing systems. This paper presents a pilot experiment that explores how LLMs can support thematic analysis of controversial topics. We compare how human researchers and two LLMs GPT-4 and Llama 2 categorise excerpts from media coverage of the controversial Australian Robodebt scandal. Our findings highlight intriguing overlaps and variances in thematic categorisation between human and machine agents, and suggest where LLMs can be effective in supporting forms of discourse and thematic analysis. We argue LLMs should be used to augment, and not replace human interpretation, and we add further methodological insights and reflections to existing research on the application of automation to qualitative research methods. We also introduce a novel card-based design toolkit, for both researchers and practitioners to further interrogate LLMs as analytical tools.
Read more5/14/2024
💬
0
Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models
M. Namvarpour, A. Razi
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in various research domains. This article examines their potential through a literature review and firsthand experimentation. While LLMs offer benefits like cost-effectiveness and efficiency, challenges such as prompt tuning, biases, and subjectivity must be addressed. The study presents insights from experiments utilizing LLMs for qualitative analysis, highlighting successes and limitations. Additionally, it discusses strategies for mitigating challenges, such as prompt optimization techniques and leveraging human expertise. This study aligns with the 'LLMs as Research Tools' workshop's focus on integrating LLMs into HCI data work critically and ethically. By addressing both opportunities and challenges, our work contributes to the ongoing dialogue on their responsible application in research.
Read more4/10/2024
💬
0
Modeling Emotions and Ethics with Large Language Models
Edward Y. Chang
This paper explores the integration of human-like emotions and ethical considerations into Large Language Models (LLMs). We first model eight fundamental human emotions, presented as opposing pairs, and employ collaborative LLMs to reinterpret and express these emotions across a spectrum of intensity. Our focus extends to embedding a latent ethical dimension within LLMs, guided by a novel self-supervised learning algorithm with human feedback (SSHF). This approach enables LLMs to perform self-evaluations and adjustments concerning ethical guidelines, enhancing their capability to generate content that is not only emotionally resonant but also ethically aligned. The methodologies and case studies presented herein illustrate the potential of LLMs to transcend mere text and image generation, venturing into the realms of empathetic interaction and principled decision-making, thereby setting a new precedent in the development of emotionally aware and ethically conscious AI systems.
Read more4/23/2024