The Latency Price of Threshold Cryptosystem in Blockchains

Read original: arXiv:2407.12172 - Published 7/18/2024 by Zhuolun Xiang, Sourav Das, Zekun Li, Zhoujun Ma, Alexander Spiegelman
Total Score

0

🌀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The research paper examines the latency costs associated with using threshold cryptography in blockchain systems.
  • Threshold cryptography is a technique that requires multiple parties to collaborate in order to perform cryptographic operations, which can improve security.
  • However, the paper suggests that this approach also introduces additional latency that could impact the performance and scalability of blockchain networks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a technique called "threshold cryptography" and how it affects the speed or "latency" of blockchain networks. Threshold cryptography is a way to make cryptographic operations, like encrypting or signing data, more secure by requiring multiple parties to work together to do it. This can be useful for blockchains, which rely heavily on cryptography.

However, the research shows that using threshold cryptography also slows down the blockchain network. This is because it takes time for all the parties involved to coordinate and complete the cryptographic operation. This added latency could be problematic for blockchains, which need to be fast and efficient to handle a large number of transactions.

The paper explores this tradeoff between improved security from threshold cryptography and the performance impact it has on the blockchain. It provides insights that blockchain developers and designers may find useful as they try to balance these competing concerns when building their systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the impact of using threshold cryptography in blockchain systems. Threshold cryptography is a technique where multiple parties must collaborate to perform cryptographic operations, such as signing transactions. This can enhance the security of blockchain systems by making it more difficult for an attacker to compromise the cryptography.

However, the paper finds that this approach also introduces additional latency into the blockchain network. The time required for the multiple parties to coordinate and complete the cryptographic operation adds delays that could impact the overall performance and scalability of the blockchain. The authors provide analytical models to quantify this latency overhead and explore the tradeoffs between security and latency.

The paper also discusses how network conditions, such as random delays and bandwidth constraints, can further exacerbate the latency issues introduced by threshold cryptography. These factors are important considerations for blockchain designers as they seek to build systems that are both secure and performant.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the latency costs associated with threshold cryptography in blockchain systems. However, it does not extensively explore potential mitigations or optimizations that could help address these performance challenges.

For example, the paper does not discuss how alternative consensus mechanisms or sharding architectures could be leveraged to reduce the impact of threshold cryptography latency. Additionally, the analysis is limited to analytical modeling, and empirical evaluations under real-world conditions may provide further insights.

The authors also acknowledge that their study focuses on a specific threshold cryptography scheme and that other approaches may have different performance characteristics. Further research comparing the latency tradeoffs of various threshold cryptography implementations would be valuable.

Conclusion

This research highlights an important tradeoff that blockchain designers must consider when incorporating threshold cryptography to enhance the security of their systems. While threshold cryptography can improve the cryptographic robustness of blockchains, the paper demonstrates that it also introduces significant latency that could undermine the performance and scalability of the overall network.

The findings in this paper provide valuable guidance for blockchain developers as they work to balance security and efficiency in their designs. Understanding the latency costs of threshold cryptography is a crucial step towards building blockchain systems that are both secure and capable of supporting high-throughput applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌀

Total Score

0

The Latency Price of Threshold Cryptosystem in Blockchains

Zhuolun Xiang, Sourav Das, Zekun Li, Zhoujun Ma, Alexander Spiegelman

Threshold cryptography is essential for many blockchain protocols. For example, many protocols rely on threshold common coin to implement asynchronous consensus, leader elections, and provide support for randomized applications. Similarly, threshold signature schemes are frequently used for protocol efficiency and state certification, and threshold decryption and threshold time-lock puzzles are often necessary for privacy. In this paper, we study the interplay between threshold cryptography and a class of blockchains that use Byzantine-fault tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols with a focus on latency. More specifically, we focus on blockchain-native threshold cryptosystem, where the blockchain validators seek to run a threshold cryptographic protocol once for every block with the block contents as an input to the threshold cryptographic protocol. All existing approaches for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems introduce a latency overhead of at least one message delay for running the threshold cryptographic protocol. In this paper, we first propose a mechanism to eliminate this overhead for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems with tight thresholds, i.e., in threshold cryptographic protocols where the secrecy and reconstruction thresholds are the same. However, many real-world proof-of-stake-based blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems rely on ramp thresholds, where reconstruction thresholds are strictly greater than secrecy thresholds. For these blockchains, we formally demonstrate that the additional delay is unavoidable. We then introduce a mechanism to minimize this delay in the optimistic case. We implement our optimistic protocol for the proof-of-stake distributed randomness scheme on the Aptos blockchain. Our measurements from the Aptos mainnet show that the optimistic approach reduces latency overhead by 71%.

Read more

7/18/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Refined Bitcoin Security-Latency Under Network Delay

Mustafa Doger, Sennur Ulukus

We study security-latency bounds for Nakamoto consensus, i.e., how secure a block is after it becomes $k$-deep in the chain. We improve the state-of-the-art bounds by analyzing the race between adversarial and honest chains in three different phases. We find the probability distribution of the growth of the adversarial chains under models similar to those in [Guo, Ren; AFT 2022] when a target block becomes $k$-deep in the chain. We analyze certain properties of this race to model each phase with random walks that provide tighter bounds than the existing results. Combining all three phases provides novel upper and lower bounds for blockchains with small $lambdaDelta$.

Read more

7/25/2024

Theoretical Analysis on Block Time Distributions in Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Consensus Blockchains
Total Score

0

Theoretical Analysis on Block Time Distributions in Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Consensus Blockchains

Akihiro Fujihara

Some blockchain networks employ a distributed consensus algorithm featuring Byzantine fault tolerance. Notably, certain public chains, such as Cosmos and Tezos, which operate on a proof-of-stake mechanism, have adopted this algorithm. While it is commonly assumed that these blockchains maintain a nearly constant block creation time, empirical analysis reveals fluctuations in this interval; this phenomenon has received limited attention. In this paper, we propose a mathematical model to account for the processes of block propagation and validation within Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus blockchains, aiming to theoretically analyze the probability distribution of block time. First, we propose stochastic processes governing the broadcasting communications among validator nodes. Consequently, we theoretically demonstrate that the probability distribution of broadcast time among validator nodes adheres to the Gumbel distribution. This finding indicates that the distribution of block time typically arises from convolving multiple Gumbel distributions. Additionally, we derive an approximate formula for the block time distribution suitable for data analysis purposes. By fitting this approximation to real-world block time data, we demonstrate the consistent estimation of block time distribution parameters.

Read more

7/22/2024

A Study on Asynchronous Vote-based Blockchains
Total Score

0

A Study on Asynchronous Vote-based Blockchains

Yibin Xu, Jianhua Shao, Tijs Slaats, Boris Dudder, Yongluan Zhou

Vote-based blockchains construct a state machine replication (SMR) system among participating nodes, using Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) consensus protocols to transition from one state to another. Currently, they rely on either synchronous or partially synchronous networks with leader-based coordination or costly Asynchronous Common Subset (ACS) protocols in asynchronous settings, making them impractical for large-scale asynchronous applications. To make Asynchronous SMR scalable, this paper proposes a emph{validated strong} BFT consensus model that allows leader-based coordination in asynchronous settings. Our BFT consensus model offers the same level of tolerance as binary byzantine agreement but does not demand consistency among honest nodes before they vote. An SMR using our model allows nodes to operate in different, tentative, but mutually exclusive states until they eventually converge on the same state. We propose an asynchronous BFT protocol for vote-based blockchains employing our consensus model to address several critical challenges: how to ensure that nodes eventually converge on the same state across voting rounds, how to assure that a blockchain will steadily progress through epochs while reaching consensus for previous epochs, and how to maintain robust byzantine fault tolerance. Our protocol greatly reduces message complexity and is the first one to achieve linear view changes without relying on threshold signatures. We prove that an asynchronous blockchain built on our protocol can operate with the emph{same} simplicity and efficiency as partially synchronous blockchains built on, e.g. HotStuff-2. This facilitates deploying asynchronous blockchains across large-scale networks.

Read more

9/14/2024