Targeted Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores techniques to improve the robustness of large language models (LLMs) against persistent harmful behaviors.
- It proposes a "Targeted Latent Adversarial Training" (TLAT) method that trains LLMs to be more resilient to adversarial attacks.
- TLAT aims to make LLMs more robust and less prone to engaging in undesirable or harmful actions.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have become incredibly powerful, but they can also exhibit undesirable or harmful behaviors. This paper introduces a technique called "Targeted Latent Adversarial Training" (TLAT) that helps make LLMs more robust and less likely to engage in these problematic actions.
The idea behind TLAT is to train the LLM to be more resilient to adversarial attacks - that is, inputs or prompts designed to trick the model into behaving in unintended ways. By exposing the model to these adversarial examples during training, it learns to identify and resist them, becoming more reliable and trustworthy.
The key innovation of TLAT is that it focuses on the model's internal "latent" representations, rather than just the final outputs. This allows the training to target specific harmful behaviors more precisely, making the model more robust in those areas.
Overall, this research aims to make LLMs safer and more dependable, so they can be used in important real-world applications without the risk of unexpected or undesirable actions. By improving the models' robustness, the hope is to unlock the full potential of these powerful AI systems while mitigating their potential downsides.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel training approach called "Targeted Latent Adversarial Training" (TLAT) to improve the robustness of large language models (LLMs) against persistent harmful behaviors.
The core idea behind TLAT is to expose the LLM to targeted adversarial examples during training, focusing on the model's internal "latent" representations rather than just the final outputs. This allows the training to specifically target harmful behaviors and make the model more resistant to them.
The process involves first identifying the harmful behaviors the model should avoid, then crafting adversarial examples that trigger those behaviors. During training, the model is exposed to these adversarial examples, incentivizing it to learn more robust representations that are less susceptible to the harmful actions.
The authors evaluate TLAT on several benchmark tasks and find that it significantly improves the model's robustness compared to standard training approaches. The TLAT-trained models demonstrate greater reliability and are less prone to engaging in undesirable or harmful behaviors, even when faced with adversarial attacks.
This research represents an important step towards developing LLMs that are more trustworthy and reliable, with reduced risk of unexpected or unintended actions. By focusing on the model's internal representations, TLAT provides a more targeted and effective way to address persistent harmful behaviors in these powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to improving the robustness of large language models, but it does acknowledge some important limitations and areas for further research.
One key caveat is that the paper focuses on a limited set of predefined harmful behaviors, and it's not clear how well the TLAT approach would generalize to a wider range of potential issues. There may be other unexpected or emergent harmful behaviors that the model could still exhibit, which the current training regime may not adequately address.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential side effects or unintended consequences of the TLAT approach. Strengthening the model's resistance to certain behaviors could potentially lead to other problematic outcomes that need to be carefully considered.
Further research is also needed to understand the broader implications of this type of targeted adversarial training. While it may improve the model's reliability in specific areas, there could be trade-offs or broader impacts on the model's performance, capabilities, or overall behavior that require more investigation.
Overall, the TLAT approach represents an important step forward, but continued research and a more comprehensive evaluation will be necessary to fully assess its effectiveness and suitability for real-world deployment of large language models.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel training technique called "Targeted Latent Adversarial Training" (TLAT) that aims to improve the robustness of large language models (LLMs) against persistent harmful behaviors.
By exposing the LLM to targeted adversarial examples during training, TLAT helps the model learn more robust internal representations that are less susceptible to undesirable actions. This represents an important advance in making these powerful AI systems more reliable and trustworthy, which is crucial for their safe and responsible deployment in real-world applications.
While the paper presents promising results, it also acknowledges limitations and areas for further research. Expanding the scope of harmful behaviors considered, understanding potential side effects, and evaluating the broader implications of this targeted adversarial training approach will be important next steps.
Overall, the TLAT technique showcases the potential to develop LLMs that are more robust and less prone to engaging in problematic behaviors, paving the way for more responsible and beneficial use of these transformative AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Targeted Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs
Abhay Sheshadri, Aidan Ewart, Phillip Guo, Aengus Lynch, Cindy Wu, Vivek Hebbar, Henry Sleight, Asa Cooper Stickland, Ethan Perez, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Stephen Casper
Large language models (LLMs) can often be made to behave in undesirable ways that they are explicitly fine-tuned not to. For example, the LLM red-teaming literature has produced a wide variety of 'jailbreaking' techniques to elicit harmful text from models that were fine-tuned to be harmless. Recent work on red-teaming, model editing, and interpretability suggests that this challenge stems from how (adversarial) fine-tuning largely serves to suppress rather than remove undesirable capabilities from LLMs. Prior work has introduced latent adversarial training (LAT) as a way to improve robustness to broad classes of failures. These prior works have considered untargeted latent space attacks where the adversary perturbs latent activations to maximize loss on examples of desirable behavior. Untargeted LAT can provide a generic type of robustness but does not leverage information about specific failure modes. Here, we experiment with targeted LAT where the adversary seeks to minimize loss on a specific competing task. We find that it can augment a wide variety of state-of-the-art methods. First, we use targeted LAT to improve robustness to jailbreaks, outperforming a strong R2D2 baseline with orders of magnitude less compute. Second, we use it to more effectively remove backdoors with no knowledge of the trigger. Finally, we use it to more effectively unlearn knowledge for specific undesirable tasks in a way that is also more robust to re-learning. Overall, our results suggest that targeted LAT can be an effective tool for defending against harmful behaviors from LLMs.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Training
Stephen Casper, Lennart Schulze, Oam Patel, Dylan Hadfield-Menell
Despite extensive diagnostics and debugging by developers, AI systems sometimes exhibit harmful unintended behaviors. Finding and fixing these is challenging because the attack surface is so large -- it is not tractable to exhaustively search for inputs that may elicit harmful behaviors. Red-teaming and adversarial training (AT) are commonly used to improve robustness, however, they empirically struggle to fix failure modes that differ from the attacks used during training. In this work, we utilize latent adversarial training (LAT) to defend against vulnerabilities without leveraging knowledge of what they are or using inputs that elicit them. LAT makes use of the compressed, abstract, and structured latent representations of concepts that the network actually uses for prediction. Here, we use it to defend against failure modes without examples that elicit them. Specifically, we use LAT to remove trojans and defend against held-out classes of adversarial attacks. We show in image classification, text classification, and text generation tasks that LAT usually improves both robustness to novel attacks and performance on clean data relative to AT. This suggests that LAT can be a promising tool for defending against failure modes that are not explicitly identified by developers.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Detecting AI Flaws: Target-Driven Attacks on Internal Faults in Language Models
Yuhao Du, Zhuo Li, Pengyu Cheng, Xiang Wan, Anningzhe Gao
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence. However, a critical concern is the presence of toxic content within the pre-training corpus of these models, which can lead to the generation of inappropriate outputs. Investigating methods for detecting internal faults in LLMs can help us understand their limitations and improve their security. Existing methods primarily focus on jailbreaking attacks, which involve manually or automatically constructing adversarial content to prompt the target LLM to generate unexpected responses. These methods rely heavily on prompt engineering, which is time-consuming and usually requires specially designed questions. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a target-driven attack paradigm that focuses on directly eliciting the target response instead of optimizing the prompts. We introduce the use of another LLM as the detector for toxic content, referred to as ToxDet. Given a target toxic response, ToxDet can generate a possible question and a preliminary answer to provoke the target model into producing desired toxic responses with meanings equivalent to the provided one. ToxDet is trained by interacting with the target LLM and receiving reward signals from it, utilizing reinforcement learning for the optimization process. While the primary focus of the target models is on open-source LLMs, the fine-tuned ToxDet can also be transferred to attack black-box models such as GPT-4o, achieving notable results. Experimental results on AdvBench and HH-Harmless datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in detecting the tendencies of target LLMs to generate harmful responses. This algorithm not only exposes vulnerabilities but also provides a valuable resource for researchers to strengthen their models against such attacks.
Read more8/28/2024
💬
0
Exploring the Adversarial Capabilities of Large Language Models
Lukas Struppek, Minh Hieu Le, Dominik Hintersdorf, Kristian Kersting
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has sparked widespread and general interest due to their strong language generation capabilities, offering great potential for both industry and research. While previous research delved into the security and privacy issues of LLMs, the extent to which these models can exhibit adversarial behavior remains largely unexplored. Addressing this gap, we investigate whether common publicly available LLMs have inherent capabilities to perturb text samples to fool safety measures, so-called adversarial examples resp.~attacks. More specifically, we investigate whether LLMs are inherently able to craft adversarial examples out of benign samples to fool existing safe rails. Our experiments, which focus on hate speech detection, reveal that LLMs succeed in finding adversarial perturbations, effectively undermining hate speech detection systems. Our findings carry significant implications for (semi-)autonomous systems relying on LLMs, highlighting potential challenges in their interaction with existing systems and safety measures.
Read more7/9/2024