LCA and energy efficiency in buildings: mapping more than twenty years of research
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines over 20 years of research on life cycle assessment (LCA) in the building and construction industry.
- The researchers used an innovative approach that combined social network analysis and text mining to analyze 8,024 scientific abstracts.
- They identified seven key thematic groups, called "building and sustainability clusters" (BSCs), and assessed their significance using a "semantic brand score" (SBS) indicator.
- The research mainly focused on building materials and energy efficiency, while also highlighting emerging and underdeveloped themes for future investigation.
Plain English Explanation
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a way to evaluate the environmental impact of a product or system throughout its entire life, from raw material extraction to disposal. Researchers have been applying LCA to the building and construction industry, looking at everything from individual building materials to entire structures.
This paper set out to get a comprehensive overview of the LCA research that has been done in this field over the past 20+ years. The researchers used some advanced analytical techniques, including social network analysis and text mining, to examine over 8,000 scientific abstracts.
Through this analysis, the researchers identified seven key topic areas or "clusters" related to building and sustainability. They then used a special measure called the "semantic brand score" to assess how significant each of these clusters was within the broader discussion around building and sustainability.
The main research topics that emerged were focused on building materials and improving the energy efficiency of buildings. However, the researchers also highlighted some emerging and underexplored areas that could be important for future research, such as sustainable accommodation and green building management systems.
Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive, data-driven look at the state of LCA research in the building sector, as well as some insights into where future work could be focused.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used an innovative methodology that combined social network analysis and text mining to conduct a large-scale review of the LCA research literature in the building and construction domain. They analyzed 8,024 scientific abstracts published over a 20+ year period, identifying seven key thematic groups or "building and sustainability clusters" (BSCs) through their analysis.
To assess the significance of these BSCs within the broader discourse on building and sustainability, the researchers applied a "semantic brand score" (SBS) indicator. This allowed them to understand which topics were most prominent and influential.
The analysis revealed that the major research topics were primarily focused on building materials and energy efficiency. For example, one of the key BSCs dealt with the life cycle impact of building materials, while another looked at energy-efficient building design and retrofitting.
In addition to this main focus, the researchers also identified some emerging and underdeveloped themes, such as the use of real-world data generation and semantic modeling for building energy management.
Overall, this study provides a comprehensive, data-driven mapping of the LCA research landscape in the building sector, offering insights into both the current state of the field and potential avenues for future investigation.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study. First, the analysis was limited to scientific abstracts, which may not capture the full depth and nuance of the research reported in the corresponding full-text articles. Additionally, the text mining and network analysis approaches, while innovative, could potentially overlook certain thematic connections or miss emerging topics that are not yet well-represented in the literature.
Furthermore, the use of the semantic brand score (SBS) metric to assess the significance of different research themes is a novel approach, and its validity and reliability have not been extensively validated across different domains. There may be concerns about potential biases or limitations in how this indicator captures the relative importance of various research topics.
Another potential issue is that the study only covered research published in academic journals and conferences. It's possible that influential work being done in industry, government, or other non-academic settings was not included in the analysis.
Despite these limitations, the study presents a valuable and comprehensive overview of LCA research in the building and construction sector. The identification of key thematic clusters and the insights into emerging research directions can help guide future investigations in this important field. Further research could explore ways to validate and refine the methodological approaches used in this study, as well as expand the scope to include a wider range of relevant literature sources.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed, data-driven mapping of over 20 years of research on life cycle assessment (LCA) in the building and construction industry. Using an innovative combination of social network analysis and text mining, the researchers identified seven key thematic clusters that capture the major areas of focus, such as building materials and energy efficiency.
By applying a semantic brand score (SBS) indicator, the study also assessed the relative significance of these different research themes within the broader discourse on building and sustainability. This offers valuable insights into both the current state of the field and potential areas for future investigation, such as the use of real-world data and semantic modeling for building energy management.
Overall, this comprehensive review serves as an important guide for scholars and practitioners working in the LCA and sustainable building domains, helping to inform future research directions and priorities. As the built environment continues to be a major focus for sustainability efforts, studies like this will be crucial for driving progress and innovation in this critical area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
LCA and energy efficiency in buildings: mapping more than twenty years of research
F. Asdrubali, A. Fronzetti Colladon, L. Segneri, D. M. Gandola
Research on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is being conducted in various sectors, from analyzing building materials and components to comprehensive evaluations of entire structures. However, reviews of the existing literature have been unable to provide a comprehensive overview of research in this field, leaving scholars without a definitive guideline for future investigations. This paper aims to fill this gap, mapping more than twenty years of research. Using an innovative methodology that combines social network analysis and text mining, the paper examined 8024 scientific abstracts. The authors identified seven key thematic groups, building and sustainability clusters (BSCs). To assess their significance in the broader discourse on building and sustainability, the semantic brand score (SBS) indicator was applied. Additionally, building and sustainability trends were tracked, focusing on the LCA concept. The major research topics mainly relate to building materials and energy efficiency. In addition to presenting an innovative approach to reviewing extensive literature domains, the article also provides insights into emerging and underdeveloped themes, outlining crucial future research directions.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Representation Learning of Complex Assemblies, An Effort to Improve Corporate Scope 3 Emissions Calculation
Ajay Chatterjee, Srikanth Ranganathan
Climate change is a pressing global concern for governments, corporations, and citizens alike. This concern underscores the necessity for these entities to accurately assess the climate impact of manufacturing goods and providing services. Tools like process life cycle analysis (pLCA) are used to evaluate the climate impact of production, use, and disposal, from raw material mining through end-of-life. pLCA further enables practitioners to look deeply into material choices or manufacturing processes for individual parts, sub-assemblies, assemblies, and the final product. Reliable and detailed data on the life cycle stages and processes of the product or service under study are not always available or accessible, resulting in inaccurate assessment of climate impact. To overcome the data limitation and enhance the effectiveness of pLCA to generate an improved environmental impact profile, we are adopting an innovative strategy to identify alternative parts, products, and components that share similarities in terms of their form, function, and performance to serve as qualified substitutes. Focusing on enterprise electronics hardware, we propose a semi-supervised learning-based framework to identify substitute parts that leverages product bill of material (BOM) data and a small amount of component-level qualified substitute data (positive samples) to generate machine knowledge graph (MKG) and learn effective embeddings of the components that constitute electronic hardware. Our methodology is grounded in attributed graph embeddings and introduces a strategy to generate biased negative samples to significantly enhance the training process. We demonstrate improved performance and generalization over existing published models.
Read more9/9/2024
📊
0
Automated Real-World Sustainability Data Generation from Images of Buildings
Peter J Bentley, Soo Ling Lim, Rajat Mathur, Sid Narang
When data on building features is unavailable, the task of determining how to improve that building in terms of carbon emissions becomes infeasible. We show that from only a set of images, a Large Language Model with appropriate prompt engineering and domain knowledge can successfully estimate a range of building features relevant for sustainability calculations. We compare our novel image-to-data method with a ground truth comprising real building data for 47 apartments and achieve accuracy better than a human performing the same task. We also demonstrate that the method can generate tailored recommendations to the owner on how best to improve their properties and discuss methods to scale the approach.
Read more8/29/2024
📊
0
Address-Specific Sustainable Accommodation Choice Through Real-World Data Integration
Peter J. Bentley, Rajat Mathur, Soo Ling Lim, Sid Narang
Consumers wish to choose sustainable accommodation for their travels, and in the case of corporations, may be required to do so. Yet accommodation marketplaces provide no meaningful capability for sustainable choice: typically CO2 estimates are provided that are identical for all accommodation of the same type across an entire country. We propose a decision support system that enables real choice of sustainable accommodation. We develop a data-driven address-specific metric called EcoGrade, which integrates government approved datasets and uses interpolation where data is sparse. We validate the metric on 10,000 UK addresses in 10 cities, showing the match of our interpolations to reality is statistically significant. We show how the metric has been embedded into a decision support system for a global accommodation marketplace and tested by real users over several months with positive user feedback. In the EU, forty percent of final energy consumption is from buildings. We need to encourage all building owners to make their accommodation more efficient. The rental sector is one area where change can occur rapidly, as rented accommodation is renovated frequently. We anticipate our decision support system using EcoGrade will encourage this positive change.
Read more8/19/2024