Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Independence Testing

Read original: arXiv:2409.06890 - Published 9/12/2024 by Nathaniel Xu, Feng Liu, Danica J. Sutherland
Total Score

0

🤿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) is a powerful tool for detecting dependence between random variables.
  • However, the choice of kernels is crucial for HSIC to work effectively.
  • Commonly used kernels like the Gaussian kernel or the distance covariance kernel may not be sufficient for more complex data distributions.
  • The paper proposes a scheme for selecting optimal kernels to maximize the power of the HSIC-based independence test.

Plain English Explanation

The Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) is a statistical technique used to understand the relationship between two sets of data. It can detect dependence between random variables, even if the relationship is non-linear or complex.

The key challenge with HSIC is choosing the right "kernels" - mathematical functions that capture the similarity between data points. Common choices like the Gaussian kernel or the distance covariance kernel may work well for simple data distributions, but struggle with more complicated relationships.

This paper presents a new method to automatically select the best kernels for the HSIC test. It does this by finding the kernels that maximize the expected power of the test - in other words, the ability to detect dependence even when it's hard to spot. The authors prove that this approach can indeed identify more complex forms of dependence between variables.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a scheme for selecting the kernels used in an HSIC-based independence test. The key idea is to choose the kernels that maximize an estimate of the asymptotic test power.

The authors prove that maximizing this estimated power approximately maximizes the true power of the HSIC test. This means the learned kernels can identify structured dependence between random variables more effectively than commonly used choices like the Gaussian kernel or the distance covariance kernel.

Through various experiments, the paper demonstrates that the proposed kernel selection approach can capture complex forms of dependence that simpler kernels struggle with. This makes the HSIC test more robust and widely applicable.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution by addressing a key limitation of the HSIC test - the need for carefully chosen kernels. The proposed kernel selection scheme is theoretically grounded and empirically validated.

However, the paper does not explore the limitations of this approach, such as its computational complexity or potential overfitting issues. Further research could investigate how the method performs under data corruption or in causal discovery tasks.

Additionally, the paper could have provided more intuitive explanations or examples to help readers without a strong statistical background understand the core ideas and their significance.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel scheme for selecting kernels that can improve the power of the HSIC-based independence test. By maximizing an estimate of the asymptotic test power, the learned kernels can identify complex forms of dependence between random variables more effectively than commonly used choices.

The proposed approach is a valuable contribution to the field of nonparametric dependence detection, with potential applications in areas like causal inference and feature selection. Further research is needed to explore the method's limitations and expand its capabilities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Total Score

0

Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Independence Testing

Nathaniel Xu, Feng Liu, Danica J. Sutherland

The Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) is a powerful tool for nonparametric detection of dependence between random variables. It crucially depends, however, on the selection of reasonable kernels; commonly-used choices like the Gaussian kernel, or the kernel that yields the distance covariance, are sufficient only for amply sized samples from data distributions with relatively simple forms of dependence. We propose a scheme for selecting the kernels used in an HSIC-based independence test, based on maximizing an estimate of the asymptotic test power. We prove that maximizing this estimate indeed approximately maximizes the true power of the test, and demonstrate that our learned kernels can identify forms of structured dependence between random variables in various experiments.

Read more

9/12/2024

Total Score

0

On the Limitation of Kernel Dependence Maximization for Feature Selection

Keli Liu, Feng Ruan

A simple and intuitive method for feature selection consists of choosing the feature subset that maximizes a nonparametric measure of dependence between the response and the features. A popular proposal from the literature uses the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) as the nonparametric dependence measure. The rationale behind this approach to feature selection is that important features will exhibit a high dependence with the response and their inclusion in the set of selected features will increase the HSIC. Through counterexamples, we demonstrate that this rationale is flawed and that feature selection via HSIC maximization can miss critical features.

Read more

6/12/2024

Robust Kernel Hypothesis Testing under Data Corruption
Total Score

0

Robust Kernel Hypothesis Testing under Data Corruption

Antonin Schrab, Ilmun Kim

We propose two general methods for constructing robust permutation tests under data corruption. The proposed tests effectively control the non-asymptotic type I error under data corruption, and we prove their consistency in power under minimal conditions. This contributes to the practical deployment of hypothesis tests for real-world applications with potential adversarial attacks. One of our methods inherently ensures differential privacy, further broadening its applicability to private data analysis. For the two-sample and independence settings, we show that our kernel robust tests are minimax optimal, in the sense that they are guaranteed to be non-asymptotically powerful against alternatives uniformly separated from the null in the kernel MMD and HSIC metrics at some optimal rate (tight with matching lower bound). Finally, we provide publicly available implementations and empirically illustrate the practicality of our proposed tests.

Read more

5/31/2024

Total Score

0

Spectral Regularized Kernel Two-Sample Tests

Omar Hagrass, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur, Bing Li

Over the last decade, an approach that has gained a lot of popularity to tackle nonparametric testing problems on general (i.e., non-Euclidean) domains is based on the notion of reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) embedding of probability distributions. The main goal of our work is to understand the optimality of two-sample tests constructed based on this approach. First, we show the popular MMD (maximum mean discrepancy) two-sample test to be not optimal in terms of the separation boundary measured in Hellinger distance. Second, we propose a modification to the MMD test based on spectral regularization by taking into account the covariance information (which is not captured by the MMD test) and prove the proposed test to be minimax optimal with a smaller separation boundary than that achieved by the MMD test. Third, we propose an adaptive version of the above test which involves a data-driven strategy to choose the regularization parameter and show the adaptive test to be almost minimax optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, our results hold for the permutation variant of the test where the test threshold is chosen elegantly through the permutation of the samples. Through numerical experiments on synthetic and real data, we demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed test in comparison to the MMD test and other popular tests in the literature.

Read more

5/3/2024