Let Community Rules Be Reflected in Online Content Moderation

Read original: arXiv:2408.12035 - Published 8/23/2024 by Wangjiaxuan Xin, Kanlun Wang, Zhe Fu, Lina Zhou
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study proposes a community rule-based content moderation framework that integrates online community rules into the moderation of user-generated content.
  • The researchers conducted experiments using datasets from two domains to evaluate the performance of their framework against baseline models.
  • The results show that incorporating community rules substantially enhances the performance of content moderation models across various evaluation metrics.

Plain English Explanation

The study focuses on content moderation, which is a widely used strategy to prevent the spread of problematic information on social media platforms. While previous research has explored automated models to support content moderation decision-making, there has been a lack of studies that incorporate the specific rules and guidelines of online communities into the moderation process.

To address this gap, the researchers developed a community rule-based content moderation framework. This framework directly integrates the rules and norms of online communities into the moderation of user-generated content. The researchers then tested the performance of their framework using datasets from two different domains, comparing it to baseline models.

The results of the experiment show that the community rule-based framework outperformed the baseline models across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, the researchers found that incorporating community rules substantially enhances the performance of content moderation models. This suggests that tailoring moderation approaches to the unique characteristics and guidelines of each online community can lead to more effective and generalized content moderation.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a community rule-based content moderation framework that directly integrates the rules and guidelines of online communities into the moderation process. This framework aims to address the limitation of existing content moderation approaches, which often fail to account for the unique norms and expectations of different online communities.

To evaluate the performance of their framework, the researchers conducted experiments using datasets collected from two domains. They compared the results of their community rule-based models to baseline models that did not incorporate community rules. The evaluation metrics included precision, recall, and F1-score.

The experiment results demonstrate the superior performance of the community rule-based models across all evaluation metrics. The researchers found that incorporating community rules substantially enhances the effectiveness of content moderation, leading to more accurate and relevant decisions.

Critical Analysis

The study presents a promising approach to content moderation that directly integrates the rules and guidelines of online communities. This is a valuable contribution, as it addresses a notable gap in the existing research, which has largely focused on developing generic, one-size-fits-all moderation models.

However, the study does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential limitations or challenges associated with implementing a community rule-based framework. For example, the authors do not discuss how to effectively capture and formalize the complex and evolving rules of online communities, or how to ensure that the framework remains adaptable to changes in community norms over time.

Additionally, the study is limited to experiments using datasets from two domains, which may not fully represent the diversity of online communities and their unique moderation needs. Further research is needed to assess the generalizability of the proposed framework across a wider range of online communities and contexts.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel community rule-based content moderation framework that directly integrates the rules and guidelines of online communities into the moderation of user-generated content. The experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of this approach compared to baseline models, highlighting the importance of tailoring content moderation strategies to the unique characteristics and expectations of different online communities.

The findings of this research have significant implications for improving the effectiveness and generalizability of content moderation models in the context of social media and other online platforms. By leveraging community-specific rules and norms, content moderation can become more responsive to the needs and preferences of users, potentially leading to improved user experiences and more constructive online interactions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Let Community Rules Be Reflected in Online Content Moderation

Wangjiaxuan Xin, Kanlun Wang, Zhe Fu, Lina Zhou

Content moderation is a widely used strategy to prevent the dissemination of irregular information on social media platforms. Despite extensive research on developing automated models to support decision-making in content moderation, there remains a notable scarcity of studies that integrate the rules of online communities into content moderation. This study addresses this gap by proposing a community rule-based content moderation framework that directly integrates community rules into the moderation of user-generated content. Our experiment results with datasets collected from two domains demonstrate the superior performance of models based on the framework to baseline models across all evaluation metrics. In particular, incorporating community rules substantially enhances model performance in content moderation. The findings of this research have significant research and practical implications for improving the effectiveness and generalizability of content moderation models in online communities.

Read more

8/23/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Community Guidelines Make this the Best Party on the Internet: An In-Depth Study of Online Platforms' Content Moderation Policies

Brennan Schaffner, Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, Siyuan Cheng, Jacqueline Mei, Jay L. Shen, Grace Wang, Marshini Chetty, Nick Feamster, Genevieve Lakier, Chenhao Tan

Moderating user-generated content on online platforms is crucial for balancing user safety and freedom of speech. Particularly in the United States, platforms are not subject to legal constraints prescribing permissible content. Each platform has thus developed bespoke content moderation policies, but there is little work towards a comparative understanding of these policies across platforms and topics. This paper presents the first systematic study of these policies from the 43 largest online platforms hosting user-generated content, focusing on policies around copyright infringement, harmful speech, and misleading content. We build a custom web-scraper to obtain policy text and develop a unified annotation scheme to analyze the text for the presence of critical components. We find significant structural and compositional variation in policies across topics and platforms, with some variation attributable to disparate legal groundings. We lay the groundwork for future studies of ever-evolving content moderation policies and their impact on users.

Read more

5/9/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Can Language Model Moderators Improve the Health of Online Discourse?

Hyundong Cho, Shuai Liu, Taiwei Shi, Darpan Jain, Basem Rizk, Yuyang Huang, Zixun Lu, Nuan Wen, Jonathan Gratch, Emilio Ferrara, Jonathan May

Conversational moderation of online communities is crucial to maintaining civility for a constructive environment, but it is challenging to scale and harmful to moderators. The inclusion of sophisticated natural language generation modules as a force multiplier to aid human moderators is a tantalizing prospect, but adequate evaluation approaches have so far been elusive. In this paper, we establish a systematic definition of conversational moderation effectiveness grounded on moderation literature and establish design criteria for conducting realistic yet safe evaluation. We then propose a comprehensive evaluation framework to assess models' moderation capabilities independently of human intervention. With our framework, we conduct the first known study of language models as conversational moderators, finding that appropriately prompted models that incorporate insights from social science can provide specific and fair feedback on toxic behavior but struggle to influence users to increase their levels of respect and cooperation.

Read more

5/7/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Bans vs. Warning Labels: Examining Support for Community-wide Moderation Interventions

Shagun Jhaver

Social media platforms like Facebook and Reddit host thousands of user-governed online communities. These platforms sanction communities that frequently violate platform policies; however, public perceptions of such sanctions remain unclear. In a pre-registered survey conducted in the US, I explore bystander perceptions of content moderation for communities that frequently feature hate speech, violent content, and sexually explicit content. Two community-wide moderation interventions are tested: (1) community bans, where all community posts are removed, and (2) community warning labels, where an interstitial warning label precedes access. I examine how third-person effects and support for free speech influence user approval of these interventions on any platform. My regression analyses show that presumed effects on others are a significant predictor of backing for both interventions, while free speech beliefs significantly influence participants' inclination for using warning labels. Analyzing the open-ended responses, I find that community-wide bans are often perceived as too coarse, and users instead value sanctions in proportion to the severity and type of infractions. I report on concerns that norm-violating communities could reinforce inappropriate behaviors and show how users' choice of sanctions is influenced by their perceived effectiveness. I discuss the implications of these results for HCI research on online harms and content moderation.

Read more

9/10/2024