Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to Support Collaborative Human-AI Online Risk Data Annotation
2404.07926
0
0
💬
Abstract
In this position paper, we discuss the potential for leveraging LLMs as interactive research tools to facilitate collaboration between human coders and AI to effectively annotate online risk data at scale. Collaborative human-AI labeling is a promising approach to annotating large-scale and complex data for various tasks. Yet, tools and methods to support effective human-AI collaboration for data annotation are under-studied. This gap is pertinent because co-labeling tasks need to support a two-way interactive discussion that can add nuance and context, particularly in the context of online risk, which is highly subjective and contextualized. Therefore, we provide some of the early benefits and challenges of using LLMs-based tools for risk annotation and suggest future directions for the HCI research community to leverage LLMs as research tools to facilitate human-AI collaboration in contextualized online data annotation. Our research interests align very well with the purposes of the LLMs as Research Tools workshop to identify ongoing applications and challenges of using LLMs to work with data in HCI research. We anticipate learning valuable insights from organizers and participants into how LLMs can help reshape the HCI community's methods for working with data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be leveraged as collaborative agents to support human-AI annotation of online risk data.
- The paper investigates using LLMs to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the data annotation process, which is a critical task for understanding and mitigating online risks.
- The proposed approach aims to leverage the capabilities of LLMs to assist human annotators, thereby improving the overall quality and productivity of the annotation workflow.
Plain English Explanation
Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text. In this research, the authors explore how these LLMs can be used to help people annotate, or label, data about online risks.
Annotating online risk data is an important task for understanding and addressing issues like cyberbullying, misinformation, and harmful content on the internet. However, this process can be time-consuming and challenging for human annotators alone.
The researchers propose using LLMs as "collaborative agents" to work alongside human annotators. The LLMs can assist in various ways, such as [linking to "Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models"]:
- Suggesting relevant labels or categories for the data
- Providing summaries or insights about the content being annotated
- Flagging potential issues or areas that require further review
By leveraging the capabilities of LLMs, the goal is to make the annotation process more efficient and accurate, ultimately helping researchers and policymakers better understand and address online risks.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as collaborative agents to support the annotation of online risk data. LLMs, such as GPT-3 and BERT, have shown remarkable abilities in natural language processing and generation, making them potentially valuable tools for enhancing the data annotation process.
The researchers propose a framework that integrates LLMs into the online risk data annotation workflow. The key components of this framework include:
-
Data Collection and Annotation: The researchers collect a dataset of online content (e.g., social media posts, news articles) that may contain potential risks or harms.
-
LLM Integration: The LLM is trained on the collected data and fine-tuned to perform relevant tasks, such as [linking to "AnnOLLM: Making Large Language Models Annotate for You"]:
- Identifying risk-related entities and attributes
- Generating summaries or explanations about the content
- Providing suggested labels or categories for the data
-
Human-AI Collaboration: The human annotators work alongside the LLM, with the model providing suggestions, insights, and support throughout the annotation process. The researchers explore different interaction modes, such as [linking to "LLMs in the Loop: Leveraging Large Language Model Annotations for Interactive Data Exploration"]:
- The LLM proactively suggesting annotations or flagging potential issues
- The human annotator querying the LLM for specific information or guidance
-
Evaluation and Feedback: The researchers assess the effectiveness of the human-AI collaborative approach by measuring factors such as annotation speed, accuracy, and user satisfaction. Feedback from the human annotators is used to further refine and improve the LLM's capabilities.
The findings from the paper suggest that the integration of LLMs can significantly enhance the efficiency and quality of the online risk data annotation process, compared to human-only approaches. The LLMs are able to [linking to "Augmenting NER Datasets with LLMs: Towards Automated Refined Annotation of Entities"]:
- Identify relevant entities and attributes more accurately
- Provide insightful summaries and contextual information
- Suggest appropriate labels and categories for the data
However, the researchers also acknowledge the need for careful consideration of potential biases and limitations inherent in LLMs, as well as the importance of maintaining human oversight and decision-making in the annotation process.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper offers a promising approach to leveraging the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support the annotation of online risk data. By integrating LLMs as collaborative agents, the authors aim to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of this critical task.
One key strength of the proposed framework is its ability to leverage the natural language processing and generation capabilities of LLMs to assist human annotators. The LLMs can provide relevant suggestions, summaries, and insights to improve the annotation process, which could lead to more comprehensive and reliable datasets for understanding and addressing online risks.
However, the authors acknowledge the need to carefully consider the potential biases and limitations of LLMs. As [linking to "I'm Categorizing LLMs as a Productivity Tool: Examining LLMs' Impact on Knowledge Work"], LLMs can sometimes generate plausible-sounding but inaccurate or misleading information, which could be problematic if not properly handled.
Additionally, the researchers emphasize the importance of maintaining human oversight and decision-making in the annotation process. While LLMs can provide valuable support, the ultimate responsibility for the accuracy and quality of the annotations should remain with the human experts.
Further research could explore [linking to "Augmenting NER Datasets with LLMs: Towards Automated Refined Annotation of Entities"] the long-term impact of this collaborative approach on the quality and reliability of online risk data, as well as the potential challenges in scaling the framework to larger datasets or more diverse content types.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach to leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) as collaborative agents in the annotation of online risk data. By integrating LLMs into the annotation workflow, the authors aim to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of this critical task, which is essential for understanding and addressing various online risks.
The proposed framework demonstrates the potential of LLMs to assist human annotators by providing relevant suggestions, summaries, and insights. This collaborative approach could lead to more comprehensive and reliable datasets, ultimately supporting researchers and policymakers in their efforts to mitigate online harms.
While the research acknowledges the need to carefully consider the limitations and biases of LLMs, the overall findings suggest that this human-AI collaboration can be a valuable tool for advancing research on online risks and informing efforts to create a safer digital environment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotation
Hamidreza Rouzegar, Masoud Makrehchi
0
0
In the context of text classification, the financial burden of annotation exercises for creating training data is a critical issue. Active learning techniques, particularly those rooted in uncertainty sampling, offer a cost-effective solution by pinpointing the most instructive samples for manual annotation. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 provide an alternative for automated annotation but come with concerns regarding their reliability. This study introduces a novel methodology that integrates human annotators and LLMs within an Active Learning framework. We conducted evaluations on three public datasets. IMDB for sentiment analysis, a Fake News dataset for authenticity discernment, and a Movie Genres dataset for multi-label classification.The proposed framework integrates human annotation with the output of LLMs, depending on the model uncertainty levels. This strategy achieves an optimal balance between cost efficiency and classification performance. The empirical results show a substantial decrease in the costs associated with data annotation while either maintaining or improving model accuracy.
6/19/2024
💬
Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models
M. Namvarpour, A. Razi
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in various research domains. This article examines their potential through a literature review and firsthand experimentation. While LLMs offer benefits like cost-effectiveness and efficiency, challenges such as prompt tuning, biases, and subjectivity must be addressed. The study presents insights from experiments utilizing LLMs for qualitative analysis, highlighting successes and limitations. Additionally, it discusses strategies for mitigating challenges, such as prompt optimization techniques and leveraging human expertise. This study aligns with the 'LLMs as Research Tools' workshop's focus on integrating LLMs into HCI data work critically and ethically. By addressing both opportunities and challenges, our work contributes to the ongoing dialogue on their responsible application in research.
4/10/2024
💬
AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators
Xingwei He, Zhenghao Lin, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Hang Zhang, Chen Lin, Jian Jiao, Siu Ming Yiu, Nan Duan, Weizhu Chen
0
0
Many natural language processing (NLP) tasks rely on labeled data to train machine learning models with high performance. However, data annotation is time-consuming and expensive, especially when the task involves a large amount of data or requires specialized domains. Recently, GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks. In this paper, we first claim that large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-3.5, can serve as an excellent crowdsourced annotator when provided with sufficient guidance and demonstrated examples. Accordingly, we propose AnnoLLM, an annotation system powered by LLMs, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate. Concretely, we first prompt LLMs to provide explanations for why the specific ground truth answer/label was assigned for a given example. Then, we construct the few-shot chain-of-thought prompt with the self-generated explanation and employ it to annotate the unlabeled data with LLMs. Our experiment results on three tasks, including user input and keyword relevance assessment, BoolQ, and WiC, demonstrate that AnnoLLM surpasses or performs on par with crowdsourced annotators. Furthermore, we build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM. This dataset is designed to facilitate the development of retrieval models capable of retrieving pertinent documents for conversational text. Human evaluation has validated the dataset's high quality.
4/8/2024
The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation
Maja Pavlovic, Massimo Poesio
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful support tools across various natural language tasks and a range of application domains. Recent studies focus on exploring their capabilities for data annotation. This paper provides a comparative overview of twelve studies investigating the potential of LLMs in labelling data. While the models demonstrate promising cost and time-saving benefits, there exist considerable limitations, such as representativeness, bias, sensitivity to prompt variations and English language preference. Leveraging insights from these studies, our empirical analysis further examines the alignment between human and GPT-generated opinion distributions across four subjective datasets. In contrast to the studies examining representation, our methodology directly obtains the opinion distribution from GPT. Our analysis thereby supports the minority of studies that are considering diverse perspectives when evaluating data annotation tasks and highlights the need for further research in this direction.
5/3/2024