Leveraging Variational Autoencoders for Parameterized MMSE Estimation

Read original: arXiv:2307.05352 - Published 8/23/2024 by Michael Baur, Benedikt Fesl, Wolfgang Utschick
Total Score

0

🤔

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The researchers propose using a variational autoencoder (VAE) framework to create a conditional linear minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator.
  • The VAE models the unknown data distribution as conditionally Gaussian, providing the conditional first and second moments needed for the MMSE estimator.
  • Three estimator variants are proposed, differing in their access to ground-truth data during training and estimation.
  • The analysis shows the proposed estimator involves a bias-variance tradeoff, a well-known phenomenon in estimation.
  • The researchers demonstrate the approach using channel estimation as an example application.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new way to estimate unknown values from noisy data. Their approach uses a variational autoencoder (VAE), a type of machine learning model, to learn the underlying distribution of the data.

The VAE allows the researchers to estimate the mean and variance of the unknown values, given the noisy observations. This is key, as these first and second moments are what's needed to construct the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator - the best possible estimator in terms of minimizing the average squared error.

The researchers propose three different versions of their estimator, each with varying requirements for access to the true, unobserved data during training and estimation. Notably, one version can work without ever seeing the true data, which is particularly useful in practical applications.

Through rigorous analysis, the researchers show that their proposed estimator involves a bias-variance tradeoff, a well-known concept in statistics and machine learning. This means there's a balance to be struck between the estimator being too simple (high bias) or too complex (high variance).

As an example, the researchers demonstrate how their VAE-based approach can be used for channel estimation in communications systems. However, the framework is general and could be applied to many other estimation problems as well.

Technical Explanation

The core of the researchers' approach is to use a variational autoencoder (VAE) to model the underlying unknown data distribution as conditionally Gaussian. This allows the VAE to provide the conditional first and second moments needed to construct a minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator.

The researchers propose three estimator variants that differ in their access to ground-truth data during training and estimation:

  1. Fully-supervised: Trained and evaluated with access to ground-truth data.
  2. Semi-supervised: Trained with ground-truth, evaluated without.
  3. Unsupervised: Trained and evaluated without ground-truth.

The analysis shows that the proposed estimator involves a bias-variance tradeoff, where increasing model complexity can reduce bias but increase variance, and vice versa. The researchers provide bounds on the difference between the proposed estimator and the true MMSE estimator, connecting the training objective to the estimation performance.

As an example application, the researchers demonstrate the approach on channel estimation in communications systems. This allows for a structured covariance matrix parameterization and low-complexity implementation. However, the framework is general and could be applied to other estimation problems as well.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a thorough theoretical analysis of their proposed VAE-based estimator, including bounds on the difference from the optimal MMSE estimator. This helps build confidence in the approach and provides insights into the bias-variance tradeoff inherent in the estimator.

That said, the analysis relies on assumptions about the data distribution being conditionally Gaussian, which may not always hold in practice. It would be interesting to see how the estimator performs when these assumptions are violated.

Additionally, while the channel estimation example is compelling, the researchers do not provide much discussion of the practical considerations and challenges of deploying such a system in a real-world communications setting. Further work exploring the feasibility and robustness of the approach in realistic scenarios would be valuable.

Overall, the proposed framework represents an interesting and principled approach to estimation problems, with the potential for broad applicability. The theoretical analysis and initial results are promising, but more work is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and practical implications of the technique.

Conclusion

The researchers have developed a novel variational autoencoder-based framework for constructing conditional linear minimum mean squared error estimators. By modeling the unknown data distribution as conditionally Gaussian, the approach can provide the necessary first and second moments to derive an MMSE estimator.

The analysis reveals that the proposed estimator involves a bias-variance tradeoff, a well-known concept in estimation theory. The researchers demonstrate the approach using channel estimation as an example, but note that the framework is general and could be applied to a wide range of estimation problems.

While the theoretical analysis is rigorous, and the initial results are promising, further work is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the technique. Nonetheless, this research represents an interesting and principled contribution to the field of statistical estimation.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Total Score

0

Leveraging Variational Autoencoders for Parameterized MMSE Estimation

Michael Baur, Benedikt Fesl, Wolfgang Utschick

In this manuscript, we propose to use a variational autoencoder-based framework for parameterizing a conditional linear minimum mean squared error estimator. The variational autoencoder models the underlying unknown data distribution as conditionally Gaussian, yielding the conditional first and second moments of the estimand, given a noisy observation. The derived estimator is shown to approximate the minimum mean squared error estimator by utilizing the variational autoencoder as a generative prior for the estimation problem. We propose three estimator variants that differ in their access to ground-truth data during the training and estimation phases. The proposed estimator variant trained solely on noisy observations is particularly noteworthy as it does not require access to ground-truth data during training or estimation. We conduct a rigorous analysis by bounding the difference between the proposed and the minimum mean squared error estimator, connecting the training objective and the resulting estimation performance. Furthermore, the resulting bound reveals that the proposed estimator entails a bias-variance tradeoff, which is well-known in the estimation literature. As an example application, we portray channel estimation, allowing for a structured covariance matrix parameterization and low-complexity implementation. Nevertheless, the proposed framework is not limited to channel estimation but can be applied to a broad class of estimation problems. Extensive numerical simulations first validate the theoretical analysis of the proposed variational autoencoder-based estimators and then demonstrate excellent estimation performance compared to related classical and machine learning-based state-of-the-art estimators.

Read more

8/23/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Bayesian Structural Model Updating with Multimodal Variational Autoencoder

Tatsuya Itoi, Kazuho Amishiki, Sangwon Lee, Taro Yaoyama

A novel framework for Bayesian structural model updating is presented in this study. The proposed method utilizes the surrogate unimodal encoders of a multimodal variational autoencoder (VAE). The method facilitates an approximation of the likelihood when dealing with a small number of observations. It is particularly suitable for high-dimensional correlated simultaneous observations applicable to various dynamic analysis models. The proposed approach was benchmarked using a numerical model of a single-story frame building with acceleration and dynamic strain measurements. Additionally, an example involving a Bayesian update of nonlinear model parameters for a three-degree-of-freedom lumped mass model demonstrates computational efficiency when compared to using the original VAE, while maintaining adequate accuracy for practical applications.

Read more

6/21/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

New!Variational Bayes image restoration with compressive autoencoders

Maud Biquard, Marie Chabert, Florence Genin, Christophe Latry, Thomas Oberlin

Regularization of inverse problems is of paramount importance in computational imaging. The ability of neural networks to learn efficient image representations has been recently exploited to design powerful data-driven regularizers. While state-of-the-art plug-and-play methods rely on an implicit regularization provided by neural denoisers, alternative Bayesian approaches consider Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation in the latent space of a generative model, thus with an explicit regularization. However, state-of-the-art deep generative models require a huge amount of training data compared to denoisers. Besides, their complexity hampers the optimization involved in latent MAP derivation. In this work, we first propose to use compressive autoencoders instead. These networks, which can be seen as variational autoencoders with a flexible latent prior, are smaller and easier to train than state-of-the-art generative models. As a second contribution, we introduce the Variational Bayes Latent Estimation (VBLE) algorithm, which performs latent estimation within the framework of variational inference. Thanks to a simple yet efficient parameterization of the variational posterior, VBLE allows for fast and easy (approximate) posterior sampling.Experimental results on image datasets BSD and FFHQ demonstrate that VBLE reaches similar performance than state-of-the-art plug-and-play methods, while being able to quantify uncertainties significantly faster than other existing posterior sampling techniques.

Read more

9/16/2024

Condition Monitoring with Incomplete Data: An Integrated Variational Autoencoder and Distance Metric Framework
Total Score

0

Condition Monitoring with Incomplete Data: An Integrated Variational Autoencoder and Distance Metric Framework

Maryam Ahang, Mostafa Abbasi, Todd Charter, Homayoun Najjaran

Condition monitoring of industrial systems is crucial for ensuring safety and maintenance planning, yet notable challenges arise in real-world settings due to the limited or non-existent availability of fault samples. This paper introduces an innovative solution to this problem by proposing a new method for fault detection and condition monitoring for unseen data. Adopting an approach inspired by zero-shot learning, our method can identify faults and assign a relative health index to various operational conditions. Typically, we have plenty of data on normal operations, some data on compromised conditions, and very few (if any) samples of severe faults. We use a variational autoencoder to capture the probabilistic distribution of previously seen and new unseen conditions. The health status is determined by comparing each sample's deviation from a normal operation reference distribution in the latent space. Faults are detected by establishing a threshold for the health indexes, allowing the model to identify severe, unseen faults with high accuracy, even amidst noise. We validate our approach using the run-to-failure IMS-bearing dataset and compare it with other methods. The health indexes generated by our model closely match the established descriptive model of bearing wear, attesting to the robustness and reliability of our method. These findings highlight the potential of our methodology in augmenting fault detection capabilities within industrial domains, thereby contributing to heightened safety protocols and optimized maintenance practices.

Read more

7/1/2024