LGB: Language Model and Graph Neural Network-Driven Social Bot Detection
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper defines the key notation used in the research paper.
- It provides a table that lists and explains the major notations used throughout the paper.
- This appendix serves as a reference for readers to understand the terminology and symbols employed in the technical content.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have compiled a list of the main notations, symbols, and abbreviations used in their paper. This appendix acts as a glossary to help readers quickly look up and understand the meaning of the various terms and mathematical expressions encountered in the technical sections. By having a centralized reference for the notation definitions, the paper becomes more accessible and easier to follow, even for readers who may not be familiar with the specific jargon or conventions used in the field. The clear explanations allow the core ideas to be communicated more effectively.
Technical Explanation
The paper includes an Appendix A that defines the major notations used throughout the document. This appendix provides a table that lists each notation, symbol, or abbreviation along with a brief description of its meaning and how it is used in the context of the research. The table covers a range of mathematical and technical terms, from basic variables and operators to more domain-specific concepts. Having this centralized reference allows readers to quickly look up the meaning of any unfamiliar notations they encounter, facilitating a better understanding of the technical content.
Critical Analysis
The notation definitions provided in this appendix are comprehensive and well-organized, which is crucial for a technical paper of this nature. By clearly explaining the meaning and usage of each symbol or term, the researchers have made a concerted effort to enhance the accessibility and clarity of their work. This appendix acts as a valuable resource for readers, enabling them to engage with the technical details more effectively.
One potential area for improvement could be to consider including examples or visual illustrations alongside some of the more complex notations to further aid reader comprehension. Additionally, the researchers could explore ways to integrate the appendix more seamlessly into the main text, such as by providing inline links or references to the relevant notation definitions as they are introduced.
Conclusion
The Notation Definitions appendix in this paper serves an important function in supporting the overall clarity and accessibility of the technical content. By providing a centralized reference for the key symbols, variables, and terminology used throughout the research, the researchers have taken a thoughtful step to enhance the readability and understanding of their work. This appendix acts as a valuable resource for readers, enabling them to navigate the technical details more effectively and focus on the core ideas presented in the paper.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
LGB: Language Model and Graph Neural Network-Driven Social Bot Detection
Ming Zhou, Dan Zhang, Yuandong Wang, Yangli-ao Geng, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
Malicious social bots achieve their malicious purposes by spreading misinformation and inciting social public opinion, seriously endangering social security, making their detection a critical concern. Recently, graph-based bot detection methods have achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. However, our research finds many isolated and poorly linked nodes in social networks, as shown in Fig.1, which graph-based methods cannot effectively detect. To address this problem, our research focuses on effectively utilizing node semantics and network structure to jointly detect sparsely linked nodes. Given the excellent performance of language models (LMs) in natural language understanding (NLU), we propose a novel social bot detection framework LGB, which consists of two main components: language model (LM) and graph neural network (GNN). Specifically, the social account information is first extracted into unified user textual sequences, which is then used to perform supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of the language model to improve its ability to understand social account semantics. Next, the semantically enriched node representation is fed into the pre-trained GNN to further enhance the node representation by aggregating information from neighbors. Finally, LGB fuses the information from both modalities to improve the detection performance of sparsely linked nodes. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that LGB consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baseline models by up to 10.95%. LGB is already online: https://botdetection.aminer.cn/robotmain.
Read more6/17/2024
💬
0
What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot Detection
Shangbin Feng, Herun Wan, Ningnan Wang, Zhaoxuan Tan, Minnan Luo, Yulia Tsvetkov
Social media bot detection has always been an arms race between advancements in machine learning bot detectors and adversarial bot strategies to evade detection. In this work, we bring the arms race to the next level by investigating the opportunities and risks of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in social bot detection. To investigate the opportunities, we design novel LLM-based bot detectors by proposing a mixture-of-heterogeneous-experts framework to divide and conquer diverse user information modalities. To illuminate the risks, we explore the possibility of LLM-guided manipulation of user textual and structured information to evade detection. Extensive experiments with three LLMs on two datasets demonstrate that instruction tuning on merely 1,000 annotated examples produces specialized LLMs that outperform state-of-the-art baselines by up to 9.1% on both datasets, while LLM-guided manipulation strategies could significantly bring down the performance of existing bot detectors by up to 29.6% and harm the calibration and reliability of bot detection systems.
Read more7/8/2024
💬
0
LOGIN: A Large Language Model Consulted Graph Neural Network Training Framework
Yiran Qiao, Xiang Ao, Yang Liu, Jiarong Xu, Xiaoqian Sun, Qing He
Recent prevailing works on graph machine learning typically follow a similar methodology that involves designing advanced variants of graph neural networks (GNNs) to maintain the superior performance of GNNs on different graphs. In this paper, we aim to streamline the GNN design process and leverage the advantages of Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve the performance of GNNs on downstream tasks. We formulate a new paradigm, coined LLMs-as-Consultants, which integrates LLMs with GNNs in an interactive manner. A framework named LOGIN (LLM Consulted GNN training) is instantiated, empowering the interactive utilization of LLMs within the GNN training process. First, we attentively craft concise prompts for spotted nodes, carrying comprehensive semantic and topological information, and serving as input to LLMs. Second, we refine GNNs by devising a complementary coping mechanism that utilizes the responses from LLMs, depending on their correctness. We empirically evaluate the effectiveness of LOGIN on node classification tasks across both homophilic and heterophilic graphs. The results illustrate that even basic GNN architectures, when employed within the proposed LLMs-as-Consultants paradigm, can achieve comparable performance to advanced GNNs with intricate designs. Our codes are available at https://github.com/QiaoYRan/LOGIN.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Graph Language Models
Moritz Plenz, Anette Frank
While Language Models (LMs) are the workhorses of NLP, their interplay with structured knowledge graphs (KGs) is still actively researched. Current methods for encoding such graphs typically either (i) linearize them for embedding with LMs -- which underutilize structural information, or (ii) use Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to preserve the graph structure -- but GNNs cannot represent text features as well as pretrained LMs. In our work we introduce a novel LM type, the Graph Language Model (GLM), that integrates the strengths of both approaches and mitigates their weaknesses. The GLM parameters are initialized from a pretrained LM to enhance understanding of individual graph concepts and triplets. Simultaneously, we design the GLM's architecture to incorporate graph biases, thereby promoting effective knowledge distribution within the graph. This enables GLMs to process graphs, texts, and interleaved inputs of both. Empirical evaluations on relation classification tasks show that GLM embeddings surpass both LM- and GNN-based baselines in supervised and zero-shot setting, demonstrating their versatility.
Read more6/4/2024