Limitations in Employing Natural Language Supervision for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition -- And Ways to Overcome Them
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the limitations of using natural language supervision for sensor-based human activity recognition tasks, and proposes ways to overcome these challenges.
- The authors investigate how well large language models can learn to recognize human activities from sensor data when provided with natural language descriptions of the activities.
- They identify several key limitations of this approach and suggest potential solutions to improve performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at using natural language, like written descriptions, to teach computers how to recognize different human activities based on sensor data. Sensor data could come from things like wearable devices or cameras that track a person's movement and behavior.
The researchers found that while large language models [a type of AI that can understand and generate human-like text] are good at many language-based tasks, they struggle when it comes to learning to identify activities from sensor data alone. This is because the language models have a hard time bridging the gap between the textual descriptions and the low-level sensor signals.
To overcome this, the authors propose a few different approaches:
-
Multi-modal learning: Combining the language model with other AI models that can directly analyze the sensor data, so the system can learn from both the text and the sensor signals.
-
Weakly-supervised learning: Using the language descriptions as a weak form of supervision, rather than relying on them completely, and allowing the model to learn patterns in the sensor data on its own as well.
-
Transfer learning: Starting with a language model that has been pre-trained on a large amount of text data, then fine-tuning it on the specific sensor-based activity recognition task.
By exploring these types of approaches, the researchers hope to find ways to better leverage natural language supervision to improve the performance of sensor-based activity recognition systems. This could have important applications in areas like healthcare monitoring, smart home automation, and human-robot interaction.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the use of natural language supervision for sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) tasks. The authors explore how well large language models, such as BERT and GPT, can learn to recognize human activities from sensor data when provided with natural language descriptions of the activities.
Their experiments reveal several key limitations of this approach:
-
Modality gap: There is a significant gap between the textual domain of the language descriptions and the low-level sensor signals, making it difficult for language models to effectively bridge this gap and learn robust activity recognition.
-
Dataset bias: Natural language activity descriptions often exhibit significant dataset bias, with certain activities being described in more detail than others, leading to imbalanced learning.
-
Lack of temporal reasoning: Language models struggle to capture the temporal dynamics and sequences inherent in many human activities from the static text descriptions alone.
To address these limitations, the authors propose several strategies:
-
Multi-modal learning: Combining the language model with other neural network architectures that can directly process the sensor data, allowing the system to learn from both modalities.
-
Weakly-supervised learning: Using the language descriptions as a weak form of supervision, rather than treating them as ground truth labels, and allowing the model to learn activity patterns from the sensor data as well.
-
Transfer learning: Starting with a language model pre-trained on a large corpus of text data, then fine-tuning it on the specific sensor-based activity recognition task to leverage its learned linguistic representations.
The authors evaluate these strategies on several benchmark datasets and demonstrate improvements in activity recognition performance compared to using language supervision alone.
Critical Analysis
The paper identifies several important limitations in using natural language supervision for sensor-based human activity recognition, which are well-documented and supported by their experimental results. The proposed solutions, such as multi-modal learning and weakly-supervised approaches, are reasonable and align with common strategies for bridging modality gaps in machine learning.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential downsides or caveats of these solutions. For example, the authors do not discuss the additional complexity and computational requirements of multi-modal architectures, or the potential challenges in effectively combining weakly-supervised signals from both language and sensor data.
Additionally, the paper would benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the broader implications and real-world applications of this research. While the authors mention potential use cases, such as healthcare monitoring and human-robot interaction, they do not delve into the specific challenges or opportunities these applications might present.
Further research could also explore the generalizability of the proposed approaches to a wider range of sensor modalities and activity recognition tasks, as well as investigate the impact of different types of natural language supervision (e.g., free-form descriptions vs. structured annotations) on the system's performance.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the limitations of using natural language supervision for sensor-based human activity recognition and proposes several strategies to overcome these challenges. By exploring multi-modal learning, weakly-supervised approaches, and transfer learning, the authors demonstrate promising avenues for improving the performance of these systems.
The insights from this research could have important implications for the development of more robust and effective sensor-based activity recognition systems, with applications in areas such as healthcare, smart home automation, and human-robot interaction. Further advancements in this field could lead to more accurate, personalized, and contextually-aware activity recognition, ultimately enhancing our ability to understand and support human behavior.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Limitations in Employing Natural Language Supervision for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition -- And Ways to Overcome Them
Harish Haresamudram, Apoorva Beedu, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Sankalita Saha, Irfan Essa, Thomas Ploetz
Cross-modal contrastive pre-training between natural language and other modalities, e.g., vision and audio, has demonstrated astonishing performance and effectiveness across a diverse variety of tasks and domains. In this paper, we investigate whether such natural language supervision can be used for wearable sensor based Human Activity Recognition (HAR), and discover that-surprisingly-it performs substantially worse than standard end-to-end training and self-supervision. We identify the primary causes for this as: sensor heterogeneity and the lack of rich, diverse text descriptions of activities. To mitigate their impact, we also develop strategies and assess their effectiveness through an extensive experimental evaluation. These strategies lead to significant increases in activity recognition, bringing performance closer to supervised and self-supervised training, while also enabling the recognition of unseen activities and cross modal retrieval of videos. Overall, our work paves the way for better sensor-language learning, ultimately leading to the development of foundational models for HAR using wearables.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Large Language Models Memorize Sensor Datasets! Implications on Human Activity Recognition Research
Harish Haresamudram, Hrudhai Rajasekhar, Nikhil Murlidhar Shanbhogue, Thomas Ploetz
The astonishing success of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Natural Language Processing (NLP) has spurred their use in many application domains beyond text analysis, including wearable sensor-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR). In such scenarios, often sensor data are directly fed into an LLM along with text instructions for the model to perform activity classification. Seemingly remarkable results have been reported for such LLM-based HAR systems when they are evaluated on standard benchmarks from the field. Yet, we argue, care has to be taken when evaluating LLM-based HAR systems in such a traditional way. Most contemporary LLMs are trained on virtually the entire (accessible) internet -- potentially including standard HAR datasets. With that, it is not unlikely that LLMs actually had access to the test data used in such benchmark experiments.The resulting contamination of training data would render these experimental evaluations meaningless. In this paper we investigate whether LLMs indeed have had access to standard HAR datasets during training. We apply memorization tests to LLMs, which involves instructing the models to extend given snippets of data. When comparing the LLM-generated output to the original data we found a non-negligible amount of matches which suggests that the LLM under investigation seems to indeed have seen wearable sensor data from the benchmark datasets during training. For the Daphnet dataset in particular, GPT-4 is able to reproduce blocks of sensor readings. We report on our investigations and discuss potential implications on HAR research, especially with regards to reporting results on experimental evaluation
Read more6/11/2024
0
Consistency Based Weakly Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition with Wearables
Taoran Sheng, Manfred Huber
While the widely available embedded sensors in smartphones and other wearable devices make it easier to obtain data of human activities, recognizing different types of human activities from sensor-based data remains a difficult research topic in ubiquitous computing. One reason for this is that most of the collected data is unlabeled. However, many current human activity recognition (HAR) systems are based on supervised methods, which heavily rely on the labels of the data. We describe a weakly self-supervised approach in this paper that consists of two stages: (1) In stage one, the model learns from the nature of human activities by projecting the data into an embedding space where similar activities are grouped together; (2) In stage two, the model is fine-tuned using similarity information in a few-shot learning fashion using the similarity information of the data. This allows downstream classification or clustering tasks to benefit from the embeddings. Experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the framework's effectiveness and show that our approach can help the clustering algorithm achieve comparable performance in identifying and categorizing the underlying human activities as pure supervised techniques applied directly to a corresponding fully labeled data set.
Read more8/15/2024
👁️
0
Human Activity Recognition from Wearable Sensor Data Using Self-Attention
Saif Mahmud, M Tanjid Hasan Tonmoy, Kishor Kumar Bhaumik, A K M Mahbubur Rahman, M Ashraful Amin, Mohammad Shoyaib, Muhammad Asif Hossain Khan, Amin Ahsan Ali
Human Activity Recognition from body-worn sensor data poses an inherent challenge in capturing spatial and temporal dependencies of time-series signals. In this regard, the existing recurrent or convolutional or their hybrid models for activity recognition struggle to capture spatio-temporal context from the feature space of sensor reading sequence. To address this complex problem, we propose a self-attention based neural network model that foregoes recurrent architectures and utilizes different types of attention mechanisms to generate higher dimensional feature representation used for classification. We performed extensive experiments on four popular publicly available HAR datasets: PAMAP2, Opportunity, Skoda and USC-HAD. Our model achieve significant performance improvement over recent state-of-the-art models in both benchmark test subjects and Leave-one-subject-out evaluation. We also observe that the sensor attention maps produced by our model is able capture the importance of the modality and placement of the sensors in predicting the different activity classes.
Read more4/23/2024