Literature Review on Maneuver-Based Scenario Description for Automated Driving Simulations
2405.08626
0
0
Abstract
The increasing complexity of automated driving functions and their growing operational design domains imply more demanding requirements on their validation. Classical methods such as field tests or formal analyses are not sufficient anymore and need to be complemented by simulations. For simulations, the standard approach is scenario-based testing, as opposed to distance-based testing primarily performed in field tests. Currently, the time evolution of specific scenarios is mainly described using trajectories, which limit or at least hamper generalizations towards variations. As an alternative, maneuver-based approaches have been proposed. We shed light on the state of the art and available foundations for this new method through a literature review of early and recent works related to maneuver-based scenario description. It includes related modeling approaches originally developed for other applications. Current limitations and research gaps are identified.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a literature review on the use of maneuver-based scenario description for automated driving simulations.
- It examines various approaches to defining and representing traffic scenarios for testing and validating autonomous vehicle systems.
- The review covers topics such as scenario-based testing, tactical challenge scenarios, and data-driven scenario generation.
Plain English Explanation
When testing self-driving cars, it's important to create realistic driving scenarios to ensure the vehicles can handle a variety of situations safely. This paper looks at different ways researchers have described and represented these scenarios for simulation-based testing.
One approach is maneuver-based scenario description, which focuses on defining the specific actions or "maneuvers" that other vehicles and road users might take, rather than just describing the overall layout of the scene. This can help create more nuanced and challenging scenarios that better reflect the complexity of real-world driving.
The paper reviews various techniques for generating these maneuver-based scenarios, including using data from real-world driving to identify common traffic patterns and defining "tactical challenge scenarios" that specifically test the limits of an autonomous system's capabilities.
By understanding these different approaches, the authors aim to provide insights that can help improve the testing and validation of self-driving car technologies through more comprehensive and realistic simulation environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the importance of scenario-based testing for validating the performance of automated driving systems. It notes that traditional approaches focused on individual driving maneuvers or simple traffic scenes may not adequately capture the complexity of real-world driving.
To address this, the authors review literature on maneuver-based scenario description, which involves defining traffic scenarios in terms of the specific actions and interactions between vehicles, pedestrians, and other road users. This can include representing complex sequences of events, such as a vehicle changing lanes to avoid an obstacle or a pedestrian crossing the street unexpectedly.
The review covers several techniques for generating these maneuver-based scenarios, including data-driven methods that leverage real-world driving data and model-based approaches that define "tactical challenge scenarios" to specifically test the limits of an autonomous system's capabilities.
The paper also discusses the use of lightweight vehicle dynamics models to simulate vehicle behavior within these scenarios and the importance of comprehensive data acquisition for creating realistic and representative simulation environments.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough overview of the current state of research on maneuver-based scenario description for automated driving simulations. However, it does not delve deeply into the specific challenges and limitations of these approaches.
For example, the review could have discussed the difficulties in accurately capturing and representing human driver behavior, particularly in complex, dynamic traffic situations. Additionally, it could have examined the computational and data requirements for generating and simulating these maneuver-based scenarios at scale.
Furthermore, the paper does not critically assess the validity and reliability of the techniques discussed, nor does it consider the potential biases or blind spots that may arise from data-driven or model-based scenario generation methods. Exploring these issues in more depth could have strengthened the analysis and provided a more well-rounded perspective.
Conclusion
This literature review highlights the importance of moving beyond simplistic traffic scenarios and embracing more sophisticated, maneuver-based approaches for testing and validating autonomous driving systems. By understanding the various techniques for generating these complex, interactive scenarios, researchers and developers can create more realistic and comprehensive simulation environments to better assess the capabilities and limitations of self-driving car technologies.
As the field of autonomous driving continues to evolve, the insights and considerations presented in this paper can help guide future research and development efforts, ultimately contributing to the safe and reliable deployment of autonomous vehicles in the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Scene-Extrapolation: Generating Interactive Traffic Scenarios
Maximilian Zipfl, Barbara Schutt, J. Marius Zollner
0
0
Verifying highly automated driving functions can be challenging, requiring identifying relevant test scenarios. Scenario-based testing will likely play a significant role in verifying these systems, predominantly occurring within simulation. In our approach, we use traffic scenes as a starting point (seed-scene) to address the individuality of various highly automated driving functions and to avoid the problems associated with a predefined test traffic scenario. Different highly autonomous driving functions, or their distinct iterations, may display different behaviors under the same operating conditions. To make a generalizable statement about a seed-scene, we simulate possible outcomes based on various behavior profiles. We utilize our lightweight simulation environment and populate it with rule-based and machine learning behavior models for individual actors in the scenario. We analyze resulting scenarios using a variety of criticality metrics. The density distributions of the resulting criticality values enable us to make a profound statement about the significance of a particular scene, considering various eventualities.
4/29/2024
Towards a Completeness Argumentation for Scenario Concepts
Christoph Glasmacher, Hendrik Weber, Lutz Eckstein
0
0
Scenario-based testing has become a promising approach to overcome the complexity of real-world traffic for safety assurance of automated vehicles. Within scenario-based testing, a system under test is confronted with a set of predefined scenarios. This set shall ensure more efficient testing of an automated vehicle operating in an open context compared to real-world testing. However, the question arises if a scenario catalog can cover the open context sufficiently to allow an argumentation for sufficiently safe driving functions and how this can be proven. Within this paper, a methodology is proposed to argue a sufficient completeness of a scenario concept using a goal structured notation. Thereby, the distinction between completeness and coverage is discussed. For both, methods are proposed for a streamlined argumentation and regarding evidence. These methods are applied to a scenario concept and the inD dataset to prove the usability.
4/3/2024
🎯
Accuracy Evaluation of a Lightweight Analytic Vehicle Dynamics Model for Maneuver Planning
J. R. Ziehn, M. Ruf, M. Roschani, J. Beyerer
0
0
Models for vehicle dynamics play an important role in maneuver planning for automated driving. They are used to derive trajectories from given control inputs, or to evaluate a given trajectory in terms of constraint violation or optimality criteria such as safety, comfort or ecology. Depending on the computation process, models with different assumptions and levels of detail are used; since maneuver planning usually has strong requirements for computation speed at a potentially high number of trajectory evaluations per planning cycle, most of the applied models aim to reduce complexity by implicitly or explicitly introducing simplifying assumptions. While evaluations show that these assumptions may be sufficiently valid under typical conditions, their effect has yet to be studied conclusively. We propose a model for vehicle dynamics that is convenient for maneuver planning by supporting both an analytic approach of extracting parameters from a given trajectory, and a generative approach of establishing a trajectory from given control inputs. Both applications of the model are evaluated in real-world test drives under dynamic conditions, both on a closed-off test track and on public roads, and effects arising from the simplifying assumptions are analyzed.
5/15/2024
An Approach to Systematic Data Acquisition and Data-Driven Simulation for the Safety Testing of Automated Driving Functions
Leon Eisemann, Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek, Henrik Gommel, David Hermann, Marvin Klemp, Martin Lauer, Benjamin Lickert, Florian Luettner, Robin Moss, Nicole Neis, Maria Pohle, Simon Romanski, Daniel Stadler, Alexander Stolz, Jens Ziehn, Jingxing Zhou
0
0
With growing complexity and criticality of automated driving functions in road traffic and their operational design domains (ODD), there is increasing demand for covering significant proportions of development, validation, and verification in virtual environments and through simulation models. If, however, simulations are meant not only to augment real-world experiments, but to replace them, quantitative approaches are required that measure to what degree and under which preconditions simulation models adequately represent reality, and thus, using their results accordingly. Especially in R&D areas related to the safety impact of the open world, there is a significant shortage of real-world data to parameterize and/or validate simulations - especially with respect to the behavior of human traffic participants, whom automated driving functions will meet in mixed traffic. We present an approach to systematically acquire data in public traffic by heterogeneous means, transform it into a unified representation, and use it to automatically parameterize traffic behavior models for use in data-driven virtual validation of automated driving functions.
5/6/2024