LLASP: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Answer Set Programming
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The provided document outlines the formatting instructions for submissions to the KR2024 conference.
- It covers the length of papers, the recommended word processing software, and other technical details.
Plain English Explanation
The KR2024 conference is an event focused on knowledge representation and reasoning. This document provides instructions on how to format papers that will be submitted to the conference.
The key points are:
- Length of Papers: Papers should be a maximum of 8 pages long, including references and appendices.
- Word Processing Software: Authors are encouraged to use LaTeX or a similar typesetting system to format their papers.
These guidelines help ensure a consistent look and feel for all the papers presented at the conference, making it easier for attendees to read and compare the research.
Technical Explanation
The length of papers is limited to 8 pages, including references and appendices. This ensures that authors focus on presenting their core ideas and findings concisely, rather than trying to fill up space.
The recommended word processing software is LaTeX or a similar typesetting system. This allows for precise control over the formatting and layout of the paper, ensuring a professional and consistent appearance across all submissions.
Critical Analysis
The formatting instructions seem reasonable and in line with typical conference paper guidelines. Limiting the length to 8 pages helps focus the content and encourages concise writing. The recommendation to use LaTeX is also sensible, as it is a widely-used and well-supported system for typesetting academic papers.
One potential area for improvement could be providing more guidance on specific formatting requirements, such as font sizes, margins, and citation styles. This level of detail could help authors better prepare their submissions and reduce the burden on the conference organizers.
Conclusion
The KR2024 formatting instructions lay out the key requirements for submitting papers to the conference. By standardizing the length and formatting, the organizers can ensure a consistent and professional presentation of the research. This, in turn, helps attendees better engage with the content and draw insights from the collective work being presented.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
LLASP: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Answer Set Programming
Erica Coppolillo, Francesco Calimeri, Giuseppe Manco, Simona Perri, Francesco Ricca
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their potential in various natural language processing tasks, including code generation. However, while significant progress has been made in adapting LLMs to generate code for several imperative programming languages and tasks, there remains a notable gap in their application to declarative formalisms, such as Answer Set Programming (ASP). In this paper, we move a step towards exploring the capabilities of LLMs for ASP code generation. First, we perform a systematic evaluation of several state-of-the-art LLMs. Despite their power in terms of number of parameters, training data and computational resources, empirical results demonstrate inadequate performances in generating correct ASP programs. Therefore, we propose LLASP, a fine-tuned lightweight model specifically trained to encode fundamental ASP program patterns. To this aim, we create an ad-hoc dataset covering a wide variety of fundamental problem specifications that can be encoded in ASP. Our experiments demonstrate that the quality of ASP programs generated by LLASP is remarkable. This holds true not only when compared to the non-fine-tuned counterpart but also when compared to the majority of eager LLM candidates, particularly from a semantic perspective. All the code and data used to perform the experiments are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LLASP-D86C/.
Read more7/29/2024
0
CLMASP: Coupling Large Language Models with Answer Set Programming for Robotic Task Planning
Xinrui Lin, Yangfan Wu, Huanyu Yang, Yu Zhang, Yanyong Zhang, Jianmin Ji
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive foundational knowledge and moderate reasoning abilities, making them suitable for general task planning in open-world scenarios. However, it is challenging to ground a LLM-generated plan to be executable for the specified robot with certain restrictions. This paper introduces CLMASP, an approach that couples LLMs with Answer Set Programming (ASP) to overcome the limitations, where ASP is a non-monotonic logic programming formalism renowned for its capacity to represent and reason about a robot's action knowledge. CLMASP initiates with a LLM generating a basic skeleton plan, which is subsequently tailored to the specific scenario using a vector database. This plan is then refined by an ASP program with a robot's action knowledge, which integrates implementation details into the skeleton, grounding the LLM's abstract outputs in practical robot contexts. Our experiments conducted on the VirtualHome platform demonstrate CLMASP's efficacy. Compared to the baseline executable rate of under 2% with LLM approaches, CLMASP significantly improves this to over 90%.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Guiding and Diversifying LLM-Based Story Generation via Answer Set Programming
Phoebe J. Wang, Max Kreminski
Instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) are capable of generating stories in response to open-ended user requests, but the resulting stories tend to be limited in their diversity. Older, symbolic approaches to story generation (such as planning) can generate substantially more diverse plot outlines, but are limited to producing stories that recombine a fixed set of hand-engineered character action templates. Can we combine the strengths of these approaches while mitigating their weaknesses? We propose to do so by using a higher-level and more abstract symbolic specification of high-level story structure -- implemented via answer set programming (ASP) -- to guide and diversify LLM-based story generation. Via semantic similarity analysis, we demonstrate that our approach produces more diverse stories than an unguided LLM, and via code excerpts, we demonstrate the improved compactness and flexibility of ASP-based outline generation over full-fledged narrative planning.
Read more7/23/2024
🛸
0
A Survey Study on the State of the Art of Programming Exercise Generation using Large Language Models
Eduard Frankford, Ingo Hohn, Clemens Sauerwein, Ruth Breu
This paper analyzes Large Language Models (LLMs) with regard to their programming exercise generation capabilities. Through a survey study, we defined the state of the art, extracted their strengths and weaknesses and finally proposed an evaluation matrix, helping researchers and educators to decide which LLM is the best fitting for the programming exercise generation use case. We also found that multiple LLMs are capable of producing useful programming exercises. Nevertheless, there exist challenges like the ease with which LLMs might solve exercises generated by LLMs. This paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on the integration of LLMs in education.
Read more5/31/2024