LLM-Based Open-Domain Integrated Task and Knowledge Assistants with Programmable Policies
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
This paper presents a novel approach to developing open-domain integrated task and knowledge assistants powered by large language models (LLMs). The key innovation is the introduction of programmable policies that allow the assistant to dynamically adjust its behavior and capabilities based on the user's needs and preferences. This enables a more flexible and adaptive interaction compared to traditional virtual assistants.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have created a new type of virtual assistant that can help with a wide range of tasks, from answering questions to completing various activities. What makes this assistant unique is its ability to change its behavior and capabilities based on what the user wants.
Normally, virtual assistants have a fixed set of features and abilities. But this new assistant can adapt and customize itself to better suit the user's needs. For example, if the user wants the assistant to be more formal and provide detailed information, it can adjust accordingly. Or if the user prefers a more casual and friendly interaction, the assistant can adapt to that as well.
This adaptability is achieved through "programmable policies" - sets of rules and guidelines that govern how the assistant behaves. These policies can be tailored to the individual user, allowing the assistant to become a truly personalized and responsive tool.
The researchers believe this approach can lead to more natural and effective interactions between humans and AI assistants, as the assistant can dynamically adjust its personality and capabilities to what works best for each user.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel architecture for open-domain integrated task and knowledge assistants powered by large language models (LLMs). The key innovation is the use of programmable policies that allow the assistant to dynamically adjust its behavior and capabilities based on the user's needs and preferences.
Traditionally, virtual assistants have had a fixed set of features and abilities. In contrast, the proposed system uses a modular design with separate components for task completion, knowledge retrieval, and policy management. The policy management component contains a set of programmable rules that govern the assistant's actions, enabling it to adapt its personality, language style, and level of task support to the user's preferences.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a series of experiments, showing that the programmable policies allow the assistant to outperform a standard LLM-based assistant on a variety of open-ended tasks. Additionally, user studies indicate that the adaptive assistant is perceived as more helpful, engaging, and aligned with the user's needs compared to a non-adaptive baseline.
The paper's key technical contributions include:
- A modular architecture for open-domain task and knowledge assistants with separate components for task completion, knowledge retrieval, and policy management.
- The introduction of programmable policies that allow the assistant to dynamically adjust its behavior and capabilities.
- Experiments demonstrating the performance and user-perceived benefits of the adaptive assistant approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to developing more flexible and personalized virtual assistants. The use of programmable policies is an elegant solution to the challenge of creating AI agents that can adapt to individual user preferences and needs.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential challenges and limitations of this approach. For example, it is unclear how the policy management component is trained and how the various policies are selected and combined for a given user. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential issues around privacy, transparency, and user control over the assistant's behavior.
Further research is also needed to understand the long-term implications of having AI assistants that can dynamically adjust their personality and capabilities. While this adaptability can lead to more natural and effective interactions, it also raises questions about the boundaries of the user-assistant relationship and the potential for manipulation or over-dependence.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of AI-based virtual assistants, but additional work is needed to fully explore the practical and ethical considerations of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to developing open-domain integrated task and knowledge assistants powered by large language models. The key innovation is the introduction of programmable policies that enable the assistant to dynamically adjust its behavior and capabilities based on the user's needs and preferences.
The proposed architecture and experimental results suggest that this adaptive assistant approach can lead to more natural, engaging, and effective interactions compared to traditional virtual assistants. By tailoring its personality, language style, and level of task support to the individual user, the assistant can become a truly personalized and responsive tool.
While the paper raises some interesting questions and areas for further research, it represents an important step forward in the development of more flexible and user-centric AI-based virtual assistants. As the field of conversational AI continues to evolve, approaches like the one presented in this paper will be crucial for creating AI systems that can truly understand and meet the diverse needs of human users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLM-Based Open-Domain Integrated Task and Knowledge Assistants with Programmable Policies
Harshit Joshi, Shicheng Liu, James Chen, Robert Weigle, Monica S. Lam
Programming LLM-based knowledge and task assistants that faithfully conform to developer-provided policies is challenging. These agents must retrieve and provide consistent, accurate, and relevant information to address user's queries and needs. Yet such agents generate unfounded responses (hallucinate). Traditional dialogue trees can only handle a limited number of conversation flows, making them inherently brittle. To this end, we present KITA - a programmable framework for creating task-oriented conversational agents that are designed to handle complex user interactions. Unlike LLMs, KITA provides reliable grounded responses, with controllable agent policies through its expressive specification, KITA Worksheet. In contrast to dialog trees, it is resilient to diverse user queries, helpful with knowledge sources, and offers ease of programming policies through its declarative paradigm. Through a real-user study involving 62 participants, we show that KITA beats the GPT-4 with function calling baseline by 26.1, 22.5, and 52.4 points on execution accuracy, dialogue act accuracy, and goal completion rate, respectively. We also release 22 real-user conversations with KITA manually corrected to ensure accuracy.
Read more7/9/2024
🔎
0
Conversational Assistants in Knowledge-Intensive Contexts: An Evaluation of LLM- versus Intent-based Systems
Samuel Kernan Freire, Chaofan Wang, Evangelos Niforatos
Conversational Assistants (CA) are increasingly supporting human workers in knowledge management. Traditionally, CAs respond in specific ways to predefined user intents and conversation patterns. However, this rigidness does not handle the diversity of natural language well. Recent advances in natural language processing, namely Large Language Models (LLMs), enable CAs to converse in a more flexible, human-like manner, extracting relevant information from texts and capturing information from expert humans but introducing new challenges such as ``hallucinations''. To assess the potential of using LLMs for knowledge management tasks, we conducted a user study comparing an LLM-based CA to an intent-based system regarding interaction efficiency, user experience, workload, and usability. This revealed that LLM-based CAs exhibited better user experience, task completion rate, usability, and perceived performance than intent-based systems, suggesting that switching NLP techniques can be beneficial in the context of knowledge management.
Read more7/15/2024
0
AgentKit: Structured LLM Reasoning with Dynamic Graphs
Yue Wu, Yewen Fan, So Yeon Min, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Stephen McAleer, Yonatan Bisk, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Yuanzhi Li, Tom Mitchell
We propose an intuitive LLM prompting framework (AgentKit) for multifunctional agents. AgentKit offers a unified framework for explicitly constructing a complex thought process from simple natural language prompts. The basic building block in AgentKit is a node, containing a natural language prompt for a specific subtask. The user then puts together chains of nodes, like stacking LEGO pieces. The chains of nodes can be designed to explicitly enforce a naturally structured thought process. For example, for the task of writing a paper, one may start with the thought process of 1) identify a core message, 2) identify prior research gaps, etc. The nodes in AgentKit can be designed and combined in different ways to implement multiple advanced capabilities including on-the-fly hierarchical planning, reflection, and learning from interactions. In addition, due to the modular nature and the intuitive design to simulate explicit human thought process, a basic agent could be implemented as simple as a list of prompts for the subtasks and therefore could be designed and tuned by someone without any programming experience. Quantitatively, we show that agents designed through AgentKit achieve SOTA performance on WebShop and Crafter. These advances underscore AgentKit's potential in making LLM agents effective and accessible for a wider range of applications. https://github.com/holmeswww/AgentKit
Read more7/26/2024
🤿
0
Human-Centered LLM-Agent User Interface: A Position Paper
Daniel Chin, Yuxuan Wang, Gus Xia
Large Language Model (LLM) -in-the-loop applications have been shown to effectively interpret the human user's commands, make plans, and operate external tools/systems accordingly. Still, the operation scope of the LLM agent is limited to passively following the user, requiring the user to frame his/her needs with regard to the underlying tools/systems. We note that the potential of an LLM-Agent User Interface (LAUI) is much greater. A user mostly ignorant to the underlying tools/systems should be able to work with a LAUI to discover an emergent workflow. Contrary to the conventional way of designing an explorable GUI to teach the user a predefined set of ways to use the system, in the ideal LAUI, the LLM agent is initialized to be proficient with the system, proactively studies the user and his/her needs, and proposes new interaction schemes to the user. To illustrate LAUI, we present Flute X GPT, a concrete example using an LLM agent, a prompt manager, and a flute-tutoring multi-modal software-hardware system to facilitate the complex, real-time user experience of learning to play the flute.
Read more5/24/2024