LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for Detecting Tricky Bugs

Read original: arXiv:2404.10304 - Published 4/17/2024 by Kaibo Liu, Yiyang Liu, Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Yudong Han, Yun Ma, Ge Li, Gang Huang
Total Score

0

LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for Detecting Tricky Bugs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for automated test case generation to detect complex, "tricky" bugs in software systems.
  • The researchers present a novel technique that leverages the natural language understanding and generation capabilities of LLMs to create effective test cases that can uncover hard-to-find bugs.
  • The proposed approach aims to outperform traditional test case generation methods, which can struggle with producing inputs that trigger edge cases or unexpected program behaviors.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to automatically create test cases for software programs using large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. The goal is to find "tricky" bugs, which are hard-to-detect issues in software that only happen in certain, unusual situations.

Traditional methods for generating test cases often struggle to come up with inputs that trigger these tricky bugs. But the researchers think LLMs can do a better job. By training the LLMs on descriptions of desired program behaviors, they can generate test cases that are more likely to uncover complex bugs that other methods miss.

The key idea is to leverage the natural language understanding and generation capabilities of LLMs. These models can take high-level descriptions of how a program should work and then automatically create test cases that exercise the program in diverse ways, including edge cases and unexpected scenarios. This could help developers find bugs that would be very difficult to catch through manual testing or simpler automated approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel technique for automated test case generation using large language models (LLMs). The researchers formulate the problem as a text-to-code generation task, where the LLM takes as input a natural language description of desired program behavior and outputs a corresponding test case.

To train the LLM, the authors collect a dataset of program specifications and their associated test cases. They then fine-tune a pre-trained LLM on this data, enabling the model to learn the mapping between natural language descriptions and executable test cases.

During inference, the LLM generates test cases given natural language prompts describing target program functionality. The authors propose several techniques to improve the quality and diversity of the generated test cases, including using prompting strategies and incorporating program analysis information.

The paper evaluates the proposed LLM-powered test case generation approach on several real-world software projects. The results demonstrate that the generated test cases are effective at uncovering complex, "tricky" bugs that are difficult to detect using traditional test case generation methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for leveraging the power of large language models to automate the generation of effective test cases for software systems. By tapping into the natural language understanding and generation capabilities of LLMs, the technique can create diverse test cases that are more likely to uncover hard-to-find bugs.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that the performance of the LLM-based approach is still dependent on the quality and coverage of the training dataset. Extending the technique to handle more complex program specifications or a wider range of programming languages could also be valuable future directions.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach on several case studies, more thorough evaluation on a broader set of software projects would help strengthen the conclusions. Assessing the scalability and computational efficiency of the technique compared to other test case generation methods would also be an important area to explore.

Overall, the paper presents a compelling application of large language models to the problem of automated test case generation. The proposed approach shows promise for helping developers identify tricky bugs more effectively, though further research and refinement will be needed to realize the full potential of this technique.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automatically generate test cases that can uncover complex, "tricky" bugs in software systems. By training the LLMs on natural language descriptions of desired program behaviors, the technique can create diverse test cases that are more likely to trigger edge cases and unexpected program behaviors compared to traditional test case generation methods.

The key innovation of this work is the idea of framing test case generation as a text-to-code translation task, allowing the powerful natural language understanding and generation capabilities of LLMs to be applied to this problem. The promising results demonstrated on real-world software projects suggest that this LLM-powered approach could be a valuable tool for improving software quality and reliability.

While the paper highlights several limitations and areas for future research, the overall concept represents an exciting application of large language models to the important challenge of automated software testing. As LLMs continue to advance, techniques like the one proposed in this work may become increasingly important for helping developers efficiently identify and fix complex bugs in their software systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for Detecting Tricky Bugs
Total Score

0

LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for Detecting Tricky Bugs

Kaibo Liu, Yiyang Liu, Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Yudong Han, Yun Ma, Ge Li, Gang Huang

Conventional automated test generation tools struggle to generate test oracles and tricky bug-revealing test inputs. Large Language Models (LLMs) can be prompted to produce test inputs and oracles for a program directly, but the precision of the tests can be very low for complex scenarios (only 6.3% based on our experiments). To fill this gap, this paper proposes AID, which combines LLMs with differential testing to generate fault-revealing test inputs and oracles targeting plausibly correct programs (i.e., programs that have passed all the existing tests). In particular, AID selects test inputs that yield diverse outputs on a set of program variants generated by LLMs, then constructs the test oracle based on the outputs. We evaluate AID on two large-scale datasets with tricky bugs: TrickyBugs and EvalPlus, and compare it with three state-of-the-art baselines. The evaluation results show that the recall, precision, and F1 score of AID outperform the state-of-the-art by up to 1.80x, 2.65x, and 1.66x, respectively.

Read more

4/17/2024

Test-Driven Development for Code Generation
Total Score

0

Test-Driven Development for Code Generation

Noble Saji Mathews, Meiyappan Nagappan

Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in generating code snippets directly from problem statements. This increasingly automated process mirrors traditional human-led software development, where code is often written in response to a requirement. Historically, Test-Driven Development (TDD) has proven its merit, requiring developers to write tests before the functional code, ensuring alignment with the initial problem statements. Applying TDD principles to LLM-based code generation offers one distinct benefit: it enables developers to verify the correctness of generated code against predefined tests. This paper investigates if and how TDD can be incorporated into AI-assisted code-generation processes. We experimentally evaluate our hypothesis that providing LLMs like GPT-4 and Llama 3 with tests in addition to the problem statements enhances code generation outcomes. We experimented with established function-level code generation benchmarks such as MBPP and HumanEval. Our results consistently demonstrate that including test cases leads to higher success in solving programming challenges. We assert that TDD is a promising paradigm for helping ensure that the code generated by LLMs effectively captures the requirements.

Read more

6/12/2024

Automatic Bug Detection in LLM-Powered Text-Based Games Using LLMs
Total Score

0

Automatic Bug Detection in LLM-Powered Text-Based Games Using LLMs

Claire Jin, Sudha Rao, Xiangyu Peng, Portia Botchway, Jessica Quaye, Chris Brockett, Bill Dolan

Advancements in large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing interactive game design, enabling dynamic plotlines and interactions between players and non-player characters (NPCs). However, LLMs may exhibit flaws such as hallucinations, forgetfulness, or misinterpretations of prompts, causing logical inconsistencies and unexpected deviations from intended designs. Automated techniques for detecting such game bugs are still lacking. To address this, we propose a systematic LLM-based method for automatically identifying such bugs from player game logs, eliminating the need for collecting additional data such as post-play surveys. Applied to a text-based game DejaBoom!, our approach effectively identifies bugs inherent in LLM-powered interactive games, surpassing unstructured LLM-powered bug-catching methods and filling the gap in automated detection of logical and design flaws.

Read more

6/10/2024

A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites
Total Score

0

A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites

Andrea Lops, Fedelucio Narducci, Azzurra Ragone, Michelantonio Trizio, Claudio Bartolini

Unit tests represent the most basic level of testing within the software testing lifecycle and are crucial to ensuring software correctness. Designing and creating unit tests is a costly and labor-intensive process that is ripe for automation. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development, including unit test generation. Although several empirical studies evaluating LLMs' capabilities in test code generation exist, they primarily focus on simple scenarios, such as the straightforward generation of unit tests for individual methods. These evaluations often involve independent and small-scale test units, providing a limited view of LLMs' performance in real-world software development scenarios. Moreover, previous studies do not approach the problem at a suitable scale for real-life applications. Generated unit tests are often evaluated via manual integration into the original projects, a process that limits the number of tests executed and reduces overall efficiency. To address these gaps, we have developed an approach for generating and evaluating more real-life complexity test suites. Our approach focuses on class-level test code generation and automates the entire process from test generation to test assessment. In this work, we present AgoneTest: an automated system for generating test suites for Java projects and a comprehensive and principled methodology for evaluating the generated test suites. Starting from a state-of-the-art dataset (i.e., Methods2Test), we built a new dataset for comparing human-written tests with those generated by LLMs. Our key contributions include a scalable automated software system, a new dataset, and a detailed methodology for evaluating test quality.

Read more

8/19/2024