LLMs generate structurally realistic social networks but overestimate political homophily
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can generate content that mimics real-world social networks
- However, these generated networks may overestimate political homophily (the tendency for people with similar political views to connect)
- This paper examines how well LLMs can capture the structural properties and political dynamics of social networks
Plain English Explanation
The researchers used LLMs to generate simulated social networks and then analyzed how well those networks matched the characteristics of real-world social networks. They found that the LLM-generated networks were able to capture many of the structural features, like the distribution of connections between people.
However, the LLM-generated networks tended to overestimate the degree to which people with similar political views were connected (political homophily). In reality, people's political beliefs don't completely determine who they are friends with, but the LLMs seemed to exaggerate this effect.
This suggests that while LLMs can produce networks that look realistic on the surface, they may not fully capture the nuances of how social connections form in the real world, especially when it comes to politically-charged topics. The researchers caution that relying too heavily on LLM-generated social networks could lead to misunderstandings about actual social dynamics.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used LLMs to generate synthetic social networks and then compared the properties of these networks to real-world social network data. They focused on two key aspects:
-
Structural realism: How well did the LLM-generated networks match the overall structural characteristics of real-world social networks, such as the distribution of connections between people?
-
Political homophily: To what extent did the LLM-generated networks accurately reflect the tendency for people with similar political views to be connected (political homophily)?
The results showed that the LLM-generated networks were able to capture many of the structural features of real-world social networks. However, the LLMs tended to overestimate the degree of political homophily, suggesting they may not fully capture the complex social dynamics that govern real-world friendships and connections.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations to their study. First, the real-world social network data they used was limited to a specific context (a university community), so the generalizability of the findings may be constrained. Additionally, the LLMs used in the study were trained on data that may not fully represent the diversity of political views and social connections found in the real world.
Despite these limitations, the study raises important questions about the ability of LLMs to accurately model complex social phenomena. While LLMs can generate content that appears realistic on the surface, this research suggests they may struggle to capture the nuanced factors that shape real-world social networks, especially when it comes to politically charged topics.
Further research is needed to better understand the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in this domain, as well as the potential implications for how these models are used to inform decision-making or make predictions about social behavior.
Conclusion
This study provides a valuable assessment of how well LLMs can capture the structural and political dynamics of social networks. While the LLM-generated networks exhibited many realistic features, the researchers found that the models tended to overestimate political homophily, suggesting they may not fully reflect the complexity of real-world social connections.
These findings highlight the importance of carefully evaluating the outputs of LLMs and not assuming they perfectly mirror reality, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like politics and social interactions. As the use of LLMs continues to expand, understanding their limitations and potential biases will be crucial for ensuring they are used responsibly and in a way that informs, rather than distorts, our understanding of the world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
LLMs generate structurally realistic social networks but overestimate political homophily
Serina Chang, Alicja Chaszczewicz, Emma Wang, Maya Josifovska, Emma Pierson, Jure Leskovec
Generating social networks is essential for many applications, such as epidemic modeling and social simulations. Prior approaches either involve deep learning models, which require many observed networks for training, or stylized models, which are limited in their realism and flexibility. In contrast, LLMs offer the potential for zero-shot and flexible network generation. However, two key questions are: (1) are LLM's generated networks realistic, and (2) what are risks of bias, given the importance of demographics in forming social ties? To answer these questions, we develop three prompting methods for network generation and compare the generated networks to real social networks. We find that more realistic networks are generated with local methods, where the LLM constructs relations for one persona at a time, compared to global methods that construct the entire network at once. We also find that the generated networks match real networks on many characteristics, including density, clustering, community structure, and degree. However, we find that LLMs emphasize political homophily over all other types of homophily and overestimate political homophily relative to real-world measures.
Read more8/30/2024
🌐
0
Network Formation and Dynamics Among Multi-LLMs
Marios Papachristou, Yuan Yuan
Social networks shape opinions, behaviors, and information dissemination in human societies. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly integrate into social and professional environments, understanding their behavior within the context of social interactions and networks becomes essential. Our study analyzes LLMs' network formation behavior to examine whether the dynamics of multiple LLMs are similar to or different from human social dynamics. We observe that LLMs exhibit key social network principles, including preferential attachment, triadic closure, homophily, community structure, and the small-world phenomenon, when asked about their preferences in network formation. We also investigate LLMs' decision-making based on real-world networks, revealing that triadic closure and homophily have a stronger influence than preferential attachment and that LLMs perform well in network formation predictions. Overall, our study opens up new possibilities for using LLMs in network science research and helps develop socially aware LLMs by shedding light on their social interaction behaviors and exploring their impacts on social dynamics.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMs
Xuhui Zhou, Zhe Su, Tiwalayo Eisape, Hyunwoo Kim, Maarten Sap
Recent advances in large language models (LLM) have enabled richer social simulations, allowing for the study of various social phenomena. However, most recent work has used a more omniscient perspective on these simulations (e.g., single LLM to generate all interlocutors), which is fundamentally at odds with the non-omniscient, information asymmetric interactions that involve humans and AI agents in the real world. To examine these differences, we develop an evaluation framework to simulate social interactions with LLMs in various settings (omniscient, non-omniscient). Our experiments show that LLMs perform better in unrealistic, omniscient simulation settings but struggle in ones that more accurately reflect real-world conditions with information asymmetry. Our findings indicate that addressing information asymmetry remains a fundamental challenge for LLM-based agents.
Read more4/22/2024
0
When LLM Meets Hypergraph: A Sociological Analysis on Personality via Online Social Networks
Zhiyao Shu, Xiangguo Sun, Hong Cheng
Individual personalities significantly influence our perceptions, decisions, and social interactions, which is particularly crucial for gaining insights into human behavior patterns in online social network analysis. Many psychological studies have observed that personalities are strongly reflected in their social behaviors and social environments. In light of these problems, this paper proposes a sociological analysis framework for one's personality in an environment-based view instead of individual-level data mining. Specifically, to comprehensively understand an individual's behavior from low-quality records, we leverage the powerful associative ability of LLMs by designing an effective prompt. In this way, LLMs can integrate various scattered information with their external knowledge to generate higher-quality profiles, which can significantly improve the personality analysis performance. To explore the interactive mechanism behind the users and their online environments, we design an effective hypergraph neural network where the hypergraph nodes are users and the hyperedges in the hypergraph are social environments. We offer a useful dataset with user profile data, personality traits, and several detected environments from the real-world social platform. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first network-based dataset containing both hypergraph structure and social information, which could push forward future research in this area further. By employing the framework on this dataset, we can effectively capture the nuances of individual personalities and their online behaviors, leading to a deeper understanding of human interactions in the digital world.
Read more7/8/2024