Lost in Magnitudes: Exploring the Design Space for Visualizing Data with Large Value Ranges

Overview

• This paper explores the design space for static visualizations of datasets with quantitative attributes that vary across multiple orders of magnitude, referred to as Orders of Magnitude Values (OMVs).
• The authors provide design guidelines and recommendations for effective visual encodings of OMVs, as current visualization techniques like linear or logarithmic scales have limitations in performing simple tasks with OMVs.
• The paper's main contributions include: 1) presenting the design space of OMVs, 2) generating a large number of OMV visualizations, some of which are novel and effective, 3) defining a new scale called E+M for OMVs, and 4) providing guidelines and recommendations for designing effective OMV visualizations.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on datasets that contain values that can be very different in size, sometimes by a factor of a thousand or more. For example, the dataset might include both tiny values, like 0.001, and huge values, like 1,000,000. The authors call these "Orders of Magnitude Values" or OMVs.

Current visualization techniques, such as using linear or logarithmic scales, have trouble effectively displaying OMVs. Linear scales can't show the smaller values well, while logarithmic scales can be hard for the general public to understand.

The authors propose a new approach that separates the OMV into two parts: the "mantissa" (the main number) and the "exponent" (the power of 10). This allows them to visually encode both parts in a way that makes the data easier to understand and analyze.

The authors systematically generated a large number of possible visualizations for datasets with OMVs, using different types of visual elements and encodings. They then evaluated these visualizations and provide guidelines on the most effective ways to visualize OMVs.

The goal is to improve visualization tools and techniques to better support datasets with values that span multiple orders of magnitude, making it easier for people to understand and work with this type of data.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by describing the design space for visualizing datasets with OMVs. The authors use four datasets, each with two attributes: an OMV (divided into mantissa and exponent) and a second attribute that is nominal, ordinal, time-based, or quantitative.

The authors systematically generated all possible visualizations for these datasets, using different visual marks and visual channels. They then refined this design space by enforcing integrity constraints from visualization and graphical perception literature.

Through a qualitative assessment of the viable visualizations, the authors discuss the most effective encodings for OMVs, focusing on the effectiveness of different visual channels and the ability to perform various tasks. This led to the definition of a new scale called E+M, which separately encodes the exponent and mantissa of the OMV.

The paper's main contributions are:

1. The presentation of the design space of OMVs
2. The generation of a large number of OMV visualizations, some of which are novel and effective
3. The definition of the E+M scale for OMVs
4. Guidelines and recommendations for designing effective OMV visualizations

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the design space for visualizing OMVs and presents several novel and effective visualization techniques. The systematic approach of generating and evaluating a large number of possible visualizations is a strength of the research.

However, the paper does not provide any user studies or empirical evaluations of the proposed visualizations. While the authors discuss the effectiveness of different encodings based on visualization and perception principles, it would be valuable to see how these visualizations perform in practice with end-users.

Additionally, the paper focuses on static visualizations and does not consider the potential benefits of using interactive or animated techniques to better convey OMVs. Further research could explore how dynamic visualizations, such as those discussed in MDD-Glyphs: Immersive Insights through Multidimensional Distribution, might enhance the understanding of OMVs.

Another potential area for future work is to investigate how the proposed visualizations and guidelines could be integrated into existing data visualization tools and systems, as mentioned in What We Augment When We Augment Visualizations and Delve into Earth's Past: Visualization-Based Exhibit.

Conclusion

This paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of data visualization by exploring the design space for visualizing datasets with OMVs. The authors present a systematic approach to generating and evaluating a wide range of visualizations, leading to the definition of the E+M scale and a set of guidelines for effectively encoding OMVs.

The insights from this research can help improve the design of visualization tools and techniques, enabling better support for datasets with values that span multiple orders of magnitude. This, in turn, can enhance the ability of users to understand, analyze, and draw insights from these types of datasets, which are increasingly common in fields such as science, engineering, and finance.