M-QALM: A Benchmark to Assess Clinical Reading Comprehension and Knowledge Recall in Large Language Models via Question Answering
2406.03699
0
0
💬
Abstract
There is vivid research on adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform a variety of tasks in high-stakes domains such as healthcare. Despite their popularity, there is a lack of understanding of the extent and contributing factors that allow LLMs to recall relevant knowledge and combine it with presented information in the clinical and biomedical domain: a fundamental pre-requisite for success on down-stream tasks. Addressing this gap, we use Multiple Choice and Abstractive Question Answering to conduct a large-scale empirical study on 22 datasets in three generalist and three specialist biomedical sub-domains. Our multifaceted analysis of the performance of 15 LLMs, further broken down by sub-domain, source of knowledge and model architecture, uncovers success factors such as instruction tuning that lead to improved recall and comprehension. We further show that while recently proposed domain-adapted models may lack adequate knowledge, directly fine-tuning on our collected medical knowledge datasets shows encouraging results, even generalising to unseen specialist sub-domains. We complement the quantitative results with a skill-oriented manual error analysis, which reveals a significant gap between the models' capabilities to simply recall necessary knowledge and to integrate it with the presented context. To foster research and collaboration in this field we share M-QALM, our resources, standardised methodology, and evaluation results, with the research community to facilitate further advancements in clinical knowledge representation learning within language models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the ability of large language models (LLMs) to recall and integrate relevant knowledge for healthcare and biomedical tasks.
- The authors use multiple choice and abstractive question answering to study the performance of 15 LLMs across 22 datasets in three generalist and three specialist biomedical sub-domains.
- The findings uncover success factors like instruction tuning that improve recall and comprehension, and show that fine-tuning on medical datasets can help models generalize to unseen specialist sub-domains.
- The paper also includes a manual error analysis that reveals a gap between models' ability to recall knowledge and to integrate it with the given context.
- The authors share their resources, methodology, and evaluation results as M-QALM to facilitate further research in this area.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models have become very popular and are being used for a variety of tasks, including in high-stakes domains like healthcare.
However, there is a lack of understanding about how well these LLMs can recall and combine relevant medical and scientific knowledge to perform healthcare-related tasks. This is a crucial capability for these models to be successful in real-world healthcare applications.
The researchers in this study aimed to address this gap by conducting a large-scale evaluation of 15 different LLMs on a variety of healthcare and biomedical datasets. They used multiple choice questions and abstractive question answering tasks to test the models' ability to recall information and apply it to the given context.
The results showed that certain techniques, like "instruction tuning," can help improve the models' recall and understanding of the material. The researchers also found that directly fine-tuning the models on medical datasets can help them perform better on specialized healthcare tasks, even if they haven't seen that specific information before.
However, the study also revealed a significant gap between the models' ability to simply recall knowledge and their ability to truly integrate that knowledge with the presented information. The researchers complement their quantitative findings with a detailed manual analysis of the models' errors, which provides valuable insights into their limitations.
To support further research in this area, the authors have made their resources, methodology, and evaluation results publicly available as the M-QALM dataset. This should help other researchers build on this work and continue to advance the capabilities of LLMs in the healthcare domain.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this study conducted a large-scale empirical evaluation of 15 different large language models (LLMs) on 22 datasets covering three generalist and three specialist biomedical sub-domains. They used multiple choice and abstractive question answering tasks to assess the models' ability to recall relevant knowledge and combine it with the presented information.
The analysis examined the performance of the LLMs across different sub-domains, sources of knowledge, and model architectures. The results uncovered several success factors, such as instruction tuning, that led to improved recall and comprehension.
The study also found that while recently proposed domain-adapted models may lack adequate knowledge, directly fine-tuning the LLMs on the researchers' collected medical knowledge datasets showed encouraging results. These fine-tuned models were even able to generalize to unseen specialist sub-domains.
To complement the quantitative findings, the researchers performed a detailed manual error analysis, which revealed a significant gap between the models' capabilities to simply recall necessary knowledge and to integrate it with the presented context. This provides valuable insights into the limitations of current LLMs in the healthcare and biomedical domain.
To foster further research and collaboration in this field, the authors have shared their resources, standardized methodology, and evaluation results as the M-QALM dataset. This should help facilitate advancements in clinical knowledge representation learning within language models.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper provides a comprehensive and insightful evaluation of large language models' performance on healthcare and biomedical tasks. The authors' multifaceted analysis, including both quantitative and qualitative assessments, offers a nuanced understanding of the models' capabilities and limitations.
One of the key strengths of the study is the breadth of datasets and sub-domains it covers, which allows for a more robust and generalizable understanding of LLM performance in the healthcare and biomedical space. The authors' decision to include both generalist and specialist sub-domains is particularly valuable, as it highlights the models' ability to handle diverse and specialized knowledge.
However, the study also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that the recently proposed domain-adapted models may lack adequate knowledge, which could be addressed by more comprehensive fine-tuning strategies. Additionally, the significant gap between the models' ability to recall knowledge and to integrate it with the presented context suggests that more sophisticated reasoning and comprehension capabilities are still needed.
While the researchers provide a comprehensive set of resources and a standardized methodology, it would be valuable to see these tools and approaches applied and validated by independent research teams. This would help ensure the robustness and generalizability of the findings, as well as identify any potential biases or limitations in the experimental design.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of large language models in the healthcare and biomedical domain. The authors' commitment to transparency and collaboration, as evidenced by the M-QALM dataset, is commendable and should facilitate further advancements in this critical area of AI research.
Conclusion
This research paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of large language models' performance on healthcare and biomedical tasks, using multiple choice and abstractive question answering as the primary assessment methods. The authors' multifaceted analysis uncovers several success factors, such as instruction tuning, that can improve the models' recall and comprehension of relevant knowledge.
The study also reveals the limitations of current LLMs, highlighting a significant gap between their ability to recall necessary information and to truly integrate it with the presented context. These findings offer valuable insights for researchers and developers working to advance the capabilities of language models in high-stakes domains like healthcare.
By sharing their resources, methodology, and evaluation results as the M-QALM dataset, the authors have created a valuable resource to facilitate further research and collaboration in this area. As language models continue to be increasingly adopted in healthcare and biomedical applications, studies like this one will be crucial in understanding their strengths, weaknesses, and the steps needed to ensure their safe and effective deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MedREQAL: Examining Medical Knowledge Recall of Large Language Models via Question Answering
Juraj Vladika, Phillip Schneider, Florian Matthes
0
0
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated an impressive ability to encode knowledge during pre-training on large text corpora. They can leverage this knowledge for downstream tasks like question answering (QA), even in complex areas involving health topics. Considering their high potential for facilitating clinical work in the future, understanding the quality of encoded medical knowledge and its recall in LLMs is an important step forward. In this study, we examine the capability of LLMs to exhibit medical knowledge recall by constructing a novel dataset derived from systematic reviews -- studies synthesizing evidence-based answers for specific medical questions. Through experiments on the new MedREQAL dataset, comprising question-answer pairs extracted from rigorous systematic reviews, we assess six LLMs, such as GPT and Mixtral, analyzing their classification and generation performance. Our experimental insights into LLM performance on the novel biomedical QA dataset reveal the still challenging nature of this task.
6/11/2024
Large Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Benchmark
Andrew Liu, Hongjian Zhou, Yining Hua, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei Clifton, David A. Clifton
0
0
The adoption of large language models (LLMs) to assist clinicians has attracted remarkable attention. Existing works mainly adopt the close-ended question-answering (QA) task with answer options for evaluation. However, many clinical decisions involve answering open-ended questions without pre-set options. To better understand LLMs in the clinic, we construct a benchmark ClinicBench. We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks. Furthermore, we construct six novel datasets and complex clinical tasks that are close to real-world practice, i.e., referral QA, treatment recommendation, hospitalization (long document) summarization, patient education, pharmacology QA and drug interaction for emerging drugs. We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings. Finally, we invite medical experts to evaluate the clinical usefulness of LLMs.
6/27/2024
MedExpQA: Multilingual Benchmarking of Large Language Models for Medical Question Answering
I~nigo Alonso, Maite Oronoz, Rodrigo Agerri
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential of facilitating the development of Artificial Intelligence technology to assist medical experts for interactive decision support, which has been demonstrated by their competitive performances in Medical QA. However, while impressive, the required quality bar for medical applications remains far from being achieved. Currently, LLMs remain challenged by outdated knowledge and by their tendency to generate hallucinated content. Furthermore, most benchmarks to assess medical knowledge lack reference gold explanations which means that it is not possible to evaluate the reasoning of LLMs predictions. Finally, the situation is particularly grim if we consider benchmarking LLMs for languages other than English which remains, as far as we know, a totally neglected topic. In order to address these shortcomings, in this paper we present MedExpQA, the first multilingual benchmark based on medical exams to evaluate LLMs in Medical Question Answering. To the best of our knowledge, MedExpQA includes for the first time reference gold explanations written by medical doctors which can be leveraged to establish various gold-based upper-bounds for comparison with LLMs performance. Comprehensive multilingual experimentation using both the gold reference explanations and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches show that performance of LLMs still has large room for improvement, especially for languages other than English. Furthermore, and despite using state-of-the-art RAG methods, our results also demonstrate the difficulty of obtaining and integrating readily available medical knowledge that may positively impact results on downstream evaluations for Medical Question Answering. So far the benchmark is available in four languages, but we hope that this work may encourage further development to other languages.
4/9/2024
Multiple Choice Questions and Large Languages Models: A Case Study with Fictional Medical Data
Maxime Griot, Jean Vanderdonckt, Demet Yuksel, Coralie Hemptinne
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT demonstrate significant potential in the medical field, often evaluated using multiple-choice questions (MCQs) similar to those found on the USMLE. Despite their prevalence in medical education, MCQs have limitations that might be exacerbated when assessing LLMs. To evaluate the effectiveness of MCQs in assessing the performance of LLMs, we developed a fictional medical benchmark focused on a non-existent gland, the Glianorex. This approach allowed us to isolate the knowledge of the LLM from its test-taking abilities. We used GPT-4 to generate a comprehensive textbook on the Glianorex in both English and French and developed corresponding multiple-choice questions in both languages. We evaluated various open-source, proprietary, and domain-specific LLMs using these questions in a zero-shot setting. The models achieved average scores around 67%, with minor performance differences between larger and smaller models. Performance was slightly higher in English than in French. Fine-tuned medical models showed some improvement over their base versions in English but not in French. The uniformly high performance across models suggests that traditional MCQ-based benchmarks may not accurately measure LLMs' clinical knowledge and reasoning abilities, instead highlighting their pattern recognition skills. This study underscores the need for more robust evaluation methods to better assess the true capabilities of LLMs in medical contexts.
6/5/2024